Erratum: "Characterizing adults receiving primary medical care in new york city: Implications for using electronic health records for chronic disease surveillance" [Prev Chronic Dis, (2017), 14, (150500e)] DOI: 10.5888/pcd13.150500;Characterizing adults receiving primary medical care in New York city: Implications for using electronic health records for chronic disease surveillance

Preventing Chronic Disease

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2016, Pages

  Romo, Matthew L ^a,b   Chan, Pui Ying ^a   Lurie Moroni, Elizabeth ^a   Perlman, Sharon E ^a   Newton Dame, Remle ^a   Thorpe, Lorna E ^b   McVeigh, Katharine H ^a  

^a NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE   (United States)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; CHRONIC DISEASE; DIABETES MELLITUS; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA; HYPERTENSION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEW YORK; NUTRITION; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROCEDURES; UTILIZATION; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHRONIC DISEASE; DIABETES MELLITUS; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA; HYPERTENSION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEW YORK CITY; NUTRITION SURVEYS; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84977501457     PISSN: 15451151     EISSN: 21665435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5888/pcd14.150500e     Document Type: Erratum

References (25)

1. Paul MM, Greene CM, Newton-Dame R, Thorpe LE, Perlman SE, McVeigh KH, et al. The state of population health surveillance using electronic health records: a narrative review. Popul Health Manag 2015;18(3):209-16.
2. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Medicare and Medicaid programs; electronic health record incentive program. Final rule. Fed Regist 2010;75(144):44313-588.
3. Heisey-Grove D, Wall HK, Helwig A, Wright JS;Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Using electronic clinical quality measure reporting for public health surveillance. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2015; 64(16):439-42.
4. Heisey-Grove D, Patel V. Any, certified, and basic: quantifying physician EHR adoption through 2014. ONC data brief no. 28: The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology; 2015. https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/briefs/oncdatabrief28_certified_vs_basic.pdf. Accessed December 10, 2015.
5. Briscoe ME. Why do people go to the doctor? Sex differences in the correlates of GP consultation. Soc Sci Med 1987; 25(5):507-13.
6. Habicht J, Kunst AE. Social inequalities in health care services utilisation after eight years of health care reforms: a crosssectional study of Estonia, 1999. Soc Sci Med 2005; 60(4):777-87.
7. Glazier RH, Agha MM, Moineddin R, Sibley LM. Universal health insurance and equity in primary care and specialist office visits: a population-based study. Ann Fam Med 2009; 7(5):396-405.
8. Dunlop S, Coyte PC, McIsaac W. Socio-economic status and the utilisation of physicians' services: results from the Canadian National Population Health Survey. Soc Sci Med 2000;51(1):123-33.
9. Diaz E, Kumar BN. Differential utilization of primary health care services among older immigrants and Norwegians: a register-based comparative study in Norway. BMC Health Serv Res 2014;14(1):623.
10. Rusanov A, Weiskopf NG, Wang S, Weng C. Hidden in plain sight: bias towards sick patients when sampling patients with sufficient electronic health record data for research. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2014;14(1):51.
11. Chiolero A, Santschi V, Paccaud F. Public health surveillance with electronic medical records: at risk of surveillance bias and overdiagnosis. Eur J Public Health 2013;23(3):350-1.
12. Aguilar-Palacio I, Carrera-Lasfuentes P, Poblador-Plou B, Prados-Torres A, Rabanaque-Hernández MJ;por el Grupo de Investigación en Servicios Sanitarios de Aragón (GRISSA). [Morbidity and drug consumption. Comparison of results between the National Health Survey and electronic medical records]. Gac Sanit 2014;28(1):41-7.
13. Crawford AG, Cote C, Couto J, Daskiran M, Gunnarsson C, Haas K, et al. Comparison of GE Centricity electronic medical record database and National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey findings on the prevalence of major conditions in the United States. Popul Health Manag 2010;13(3):139-50.
14. Violán C, Foguet-Boreu Q, Hermosilla-Pérez E, Valderas JM, Bolíbar B, Fàbregas-Escurriola M, et al. Comparison of the information provided by electronic health records data and a population health survey to estimate prevalence of selected health conditions and multimorbidity. BMC Public Health 2013;13(1):251.
15. Bailey LC, Milov DE, Kelleher K, Kahn MG, Del Beccaro M, Yu F, et al. Multi-institutional sharing of electronic health record data to assess childhood obesity. PLoS One 2013; 8(6):e66192.
16. Booth HP, Prevost AT, Gulliford MC. Validity of smoking prevalence estimates from primary care electronic health records compared with national population survey data for England, 2007 to 2011. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2013; 22(12):1357-61.
17. Jones PH, Nair R, Thakker KM. Prevalence of dyslipidemia and lipid goal attainment in statin-treated subjects from 3 data sources: a retrospective analysis. J Am Heart Assoc 2012; 1(6):e001800.
18. Zellweger U, Bopp M, Holzer BM, Djalali S, Kaplan V. Prevalence of chronic medical conditions in Switzerland: exploring estimates validity by comparing complementary data sources. BMC Public Health 2014;14(1):1157.
19. Tomasallo CD, Hanrahan LP, Tandias A, Chang TS, Cowan KJ, Guilbert TW. Estimating Wisconsin asthma prevalence using clinical electronic health records and public health data. Am J Public Health 2014;104(1):e65-73.
20. Survey data on the health of New Yorkers. New York City Community Health Survey (CHS): New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. http://www1.nyc.gov/site/doh/data/data-sets/community-health-survey.page. Accessed December 10, 2015.
21. Thorpe LE, Greene C, Freeman A, Snell E, Rodriguez-Lopez JS, Frankel M, et al. Rationale, design and respondent characteristics of the 2013-2014 New York City Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NYC HANES 2013-2014). Prev Med Rep 2015;2:580-5.
22. Kessler RC, Andrews G, Colpe LJ, Hiripi E, Mroczek DK, Normand SL, et al. Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychol Med 2002;32(6):959-76. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=17375867&dopt=Abstract
23. Sommers BD, Gunja MZ, Finegold K, Musco T. Changes in self-reported insurance coverage, access to care, and health under the Affordable Care Act. JAMA 2015;314(4):366-74
24. Jatrana S, Crampton P. Affiliation with a primary care provider in New Zealand: who is, who isn't. Health Policy 2009; 91(3):286-96.
25. McVeigh KH, Newton-Dame R, Perlman S, Chernov C, Thorpe L, Singer J, Greene C. Developing an electronic health record-based population health surveillance system. New York (NY): New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene; 2013. http://www.nyc.gov/html/doh/downloads/pdf/data/nyc-macro-report.pdf. Accessed December 10, 2015.