A survey of Triple Graph Grammar tools

Electronic Communications of the EASST

Volumn 57, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Hildebrandt, Stephan ^a   Lambers, Leen ^a   Giese, Holger ^a   Rieke, Jan ^b   Greenyer, Joel ^c   Schäfer, Wilhelm ^b   Lauder, Marius ^d   Anjorin, Anthony ^d   Schürr, Andy ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PADERBORN   (Germany)

^c POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

^d DARMSTADT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bidirectionality; eMoflon; MoTE; TGG Interpreter; Triple graph grammars

Indexed keywords

EID: 84977499324     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18632122     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14279/tuj.eceasst.57.865.858     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. A. Anjorin, M. Lauder, S. Patzina, A. Schürr. eMoflon: Leveraging EMF and Professional CASE Tools. In MEMWe '11. LNI 192, p. 281. GI, 2011
2. A. Anjorin, K. Saller, S. Rose, A. Schürr. A Framework for Bidirectional Model-to-Platform Transformations. In Proc. of SLE 2012. LNCS. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, 2012
3. A. Anjorin, A. Schürr, G. Taentzer. Construction of Integrity Preserving Triple Graph Grammars. In Ehrig et al. (eds.), Proc. of ICGT '12. LNCS 7562, pp. 356-370. Springer, 2012
4. A. Anjorin, G. Varró, A. Schürr. Complex Attribute Manipulation in TGGs With Constraint-Based Programming Techniques. In Hermann and Voigtländer (eds.), Proc. of bx '12. EC-EASST 49, pp. 1-16. EASST, 2012
5. J. Bézivin, B. Rumpe, A. Schürr, L. Tratt. Model Transformation in Practice. In Bruel (ed.), MoDELS 2005 Workshops. LNCS 3844, pp. 120-127. Springer, 2006
6. K. Czarnecki, S. Helsen. Feature-Based Survey of Model Transformation Approaches. IBM Systems Journal 45(3):621-645, 2006
7. H. Ehrig, K. Ehrig, C. Ermel, F. Hermann, G. Taentzer. Information Preserving Bidirectional Model Transformations. In Dwyer and Lopes (eds.), Proc. of FASE '07. LNCS 4422, pp. 72-86. Springer, 2007
8. H. Giese, S. Hildebrandt. Efficient Model Synchronization of Large-Scale Models. Technical report 28, Universitätsverlag Potsdam, 2009
9. H. Giese, S. Hildebrandt, L. Lambers. Toward Bridging the Gap Between Formal Semantics and Implementation of Triple Graph Grammars. In Proc. of MoDeVVa '10. Pp. 19-24. IEEE, 2010
10. H. Giese, S. Hildebrandt, A. Seibel. Improved Flexibility and Scalability by Interpreting Story Diagrams. In Margaria et al. (eds.), Proc. of GT-VMT '09. ECEASST 18. EASST, 2009
11. J. Greenyer, E. Kindler. Reconciling TGGs with QVT. In Engels et al. (eds.), Proc. of MoDELS '07. LNCS 4735, pp. 16-30. Springer, 2007
12. J. Greenyer, E. Kindler. Comparing Relational Model Transformation Technologies: Implementing Query/View/Transformation with Triple Graph Grammars. SoSyM 9(1):21-46, 2010
13. H. Giese, S. Neumann, S. Hildebrandt. Model Synchronization at Work: Keeping SysML and AUTOSAR Models Consistent. In Engels et al. (eds.), Festschrift Nagl. LNCS 5765, pp. 555-579. Springer, 2010
14. J. Greenyer, S. Pook, J. Rieke. Preventing Information Loss in Incremental Model Synchronization by Reusing Elements. In France et al. (eds.), Proc. of ECMFA '11. LNCS 6698, pp. 144-159. Springer, 2011
15. J. Greenyer, J. Rieke. Applying Advanced TGG Concepts for a Complex Transformation of Sequence Diagram Specifications to Timed Game Automata. In Schürr et al. (eds.), Proc. of AGTIVE 2011. LNCS 7233, pp. 222-237. Springer, 2012
16. F. Hermann, H. Ehrig, U. Golas, F. Orejas. Efficient Analysis and Execution of Correct and Complete Model Transformations Based on Triple Graph Grammars. In Bézivin et al. (eds.), Proc. of MDI '10. Pp. 22-31. ACM, 2010
17. S. Hildebrandt, L. Lambers, H. Giese, D. Petrick, I. Richter. Automatic Conformance Testing of Optimized Triple Graph Grammar Implementations. In Schürr et al. (eds.), Proc. of AGTIVE '11. Volume 7233, pp. 238-253. Springer, 2012
18. F. Klar, M. Lauder, A. Königs, A. Schürr. Extended Triple Graph Grammars With Efficient and Compatible Graph Translators. In Engels et al. (eds.), Festschrift Nagl. LNCS 5765, pp. 141-174. Springer, 2010
19. E. Kindler, R.Wagner. Triple Graph Grammars: Concepts, Extensions, Implementations, and Application Scenarios. Technical report tr-ri-07-284, Department of Computer Science, University of Paderborn, 2007
20. M. Lauder, A. Anjorin, G. Varró, A. Schürr. Efficient Model Synchronization With Precedence Triple Graph Grammars. In Ehrig et al. (eds.), Proc. of ICGT '12. LNCS 7562, pp. 401-415. Springer, 2012
21. M. Lauder, M. Schlereth, S. Rose, A. Schürr. Model-Driven Systems Engineering: State-of-the-Art and Research Challenges. Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Technical Sciences 58(3):409-422, 2010
22. T. Mens, P. Van Gorp. A Taxonomy of Model Transformation. ENTCS 152:125-142, 2006
23. Online demos for all tools as SHARE images. http://www.moflon.org/emoflon/ a-survey-of-tgg-tools/. 2012
24. J. Rieke, O. Sudmann. Specifying Refinement Relations in Vertical Model Transformations. In Proc. of ECMFA 2012. Pp. 210-225. Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, 2012
25. P. Stevens. A Landscape of Bidirectional Model Transformations. In Lämmel et al. (eds.), Proc. of GTTSE '07. LNCS 5235, pp. 408-424. Springer, 2008
26. P. Van Gorp, S. Mazanek. SHARE: A Web Portal for Creating and Sharing Executable Research Papers. Proc. of ICCS '11 4:589-597, 2011
27. G. Varró, A. Schürr, D. Varró. Benchmarking for Graph Transformation. In Proc. of VLHCC '05. Pp. 79-88. IEEE, 2005