Increasing Inferential Leverage in the Comparative Method: Placebo Tests in Small-n Research

Sociological Methods and Research

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 598-629

  Glynn, Adam N ^a   Ichino, Nahomi ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

case selection; causal inference; comparative method; placebo test; small n

Indexed keywords

EID: 84977477386     PISSN: 00491241     EISSN: 15528294     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0049124114528879     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. A.AbadieAlbertoA.DiamondAlexisJ.HainmuellerJens. 2010. “Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of California’s Tobacco Control Program.” Journal of the American Statistical Association105:493–505.
2. A.AbadieAlbertoA.DiamondAlexisJ.HainmuellerJens. 2011. “Comparative Politics and the Synthetic Control Method.” MIT Political Science Department Research Paper No. 2011-25, Cambridge, MA.
3. R.K.AdcockRobert K.2008. “The Curious Career of ‘the Comparative Method’: The Case of Mill’s Methods.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA.
4. G.A.AlmondGabriel A.S.VerbaSidney. 1963. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5. H.E.BradyHenry E.2004. “Doing Good and Doing Better: How Far Does the Quantitative Template Get Us.” Pp. 53–68 in Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, edited by. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
6. H.E.BradyHenry E.D.CollierDavid, eds. 2004. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
7. D.CollierDavid. 1993. “The Comparative Method.” Pp. 105–19 in Political Science: The State of the Discipline II, edited by. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
8. D.EikemeierDieter. 1976. “Villages and Quarters as Instruments of Local Control in Yi Dynasty Korea.” T’oung Pao, Second Series62:71–110.
9. L.D.EpsteinLeon D.1964. “A Comparative Study of Canadian Parties.” American Political Science Review58:46–59.
10. B.GeddesBarbara. 1990. “How the Cases You Choose Affect the Answers You Get: Selection Bias in Comparative Politics.” Political Analysis2:131–52.
11. J.GerringJohn. 2007. Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. New York: Cambridge University Press.
12. P.W.HollandPaul W.1986. “Statistics and Causal Inference.” Journal of the American Statistical Association81:945–60.
13. S.M.IacusStefano M.G.KingGaryG.PorroGiuseppe. 2012. “Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching.” Political Analysis20:1–24.
14. G.W.ImbensGuido W.2004. “Nonparametric Estimation of Average Treatment Effects under Exogeneity: A Review.” Review of Economics and Statistics86:4–29.
15. S.J.KimSun Joo. 2007. “Taxes, the Local Elite, and the Rural Populace in the Chinju Uprising of 1862.” Journal of Asian Studies66:993–1027.
16. G.KingGaryR.O.KeohaneRobert O.S.VerbaSidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17. S.LiebersonStanley. 1991. “Small N’s and Big Conclusions: An Examination of the Reasoning in Comparative Studies Based on a Small Number of Cases.” Social Forces70:307–20.
18. S.LiebersonStanley. 1994. “More on the Uneasy Case for Using Mill-type Methods in Small-N Comparative Studies.” Social Forces72:1225–37.
19. A.E.LijphartArend E.1971. “Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method.” American Political Science Review65:682–93.
20. A.E.LijphartArend E.1975. “II. The Comparable-cases Strategy in Comparative Research.” Comparative Political Studies8:158–77.
21. J.S.MillJohn Stuart. 1872. A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive: Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence and the Methods of Scientific Investigation. 8th ed. London, England: Longmans, Green, Reader and Dyer.
22. B.MooreBarringtonJr. 1966. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World. Boston, MA: Beacon.
23. G.MunckGerardo. 2004. “Tools for Qualitative Research.” Pp. 105–22 in Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, edited by. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
24. R.A.NielsenRichard A.2011. “Case Selection via Matching.” Working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
25. J.B.PalaisJames B.1975. Politics and Policy in Traditional Korea. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26. A.PrzeworskiAdamH.TeuneHenry. 1970. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
27. C.C.RaginCharles C.1987. The Comparative Method: Moving beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
28. P.R.RosenbaumPaul R.2001. “Stability in the Absence of Treatment.” Journal of the American Statistical Association96:210–19.
29. P.R.RosenbaumPaul R.2002. Observational Studies. 2nd ed. New York: Springer.
30. J.S.SekhonJasjeet S.2004. “Quality Meets Quantity: Case Studies, Conditional Probability, and Counterfactuals.” Perspectives on Politics2:281–93.
31. G.-W.ShinGi-Wook. 1998. “Agrarian Conflict and the Origins of Korean Capitalism.” American Journal of Sociology103:1309–51.
32. T.SkocpolTheda. 1973. “A Critical Review of Barrington Moore’s Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy.” Politics & Society4:1–34.
33. T.SkocpolTheda. 1979. States & Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, & China. New York: Cambridge University Press.
34. T.SkocpolThedaM.SomersMargaret. 1980. “The Uses of Comparative History in Macrosocial Inquiry.” Comparative Studies in Society and History22:174–97.
35. C.SorensenClark. 1984. “Farm Labor and Family Cycle in Traditional Korea and Japan.” Journal of Anthropological Research40:306–23.