Environmental Impact Assessment: An Analysis of the Canadian Experience

International Studies

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 1993, Pages 299-318

  Prasad, Kamta ^a  

^a Indian Institute of Public Administration New Delhi   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84977215560     PISSN: 00208817     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0020881793030003003     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Canadian Environmental Assessment Research Council, Philosophy and Themes of Research (Hull, Que., 1986), p.1.
2. Canadian Environmental Assessment Research Council, Evaluating Environment Impact Assessment: An Action Prospectus (Hull, Que., 1988), p. 1.
3. H. Thiessen, “Environmental Impact Assessment Methodologies in Canada”, in Environmental Impact Assessment (New York: Pergamon Press, for the United Nations, 1981), p. 32.
4. Thomas Meredith, “Environmental Impact Assessment and Monitoring”, in Bruce Mitchell, ed. Resources Management and Development (Toronto, Ont.: Oxford University Press, 1991).
5. Report of the Study Group on Environmental Assessment Hearing Procedures, n. 6, p. 6.
6. J.B.R. Whitney and V.W. Maclaren, “A Framework for the Assessment of EIA Methodologies”, in J.B.R. Whitney and V.W. Maclaren, eds., Environmental Impact Assessment: The Canadian Experience (Toronto, Ont.: University of Toronto, Institute for Environmental Studies, 1985), p. 1.
7. Gordon E. Beansland and Peter N. Duinker, An Ecological Framework for Environmental Impact Assessment in Canada (Halifax, Nova Scotia: Institute for Resource and Development Studies, Dalhousie University, Canada, 1983), p. 1.
8. Government of Canada, Federal Environmental Assessment Review Office, The National Consultation Workshop on Federal Environmental Assessment Reform: Report of Proceedings (Ottawa, Ont., 1988), p. 18.
9. Report of the Study Group on Environmental Assessment Hearing Procedures, n. 6. p. 35.
10. A.P. Grima, “Participatory Rites: Integrating Public Involvement in Environmental Impact Assessment”, in Whitney and Maclaren, n. 9, p. 33.
11. Report of the Study Group on Environmental Assessment Hearing Procedures, n. 6, p. 1.
12. F.C. Hurtubise and R.G. Connelly, “Public Participation in Canadian Environmental Assessment and Review Process”, in Environmental Impact Assessment, n. 3, p. 279.
13. Government of Canada, Ministry of Supply and Services, Reforming Federal Environmental Assessment: A Discussion Paper (Ottawa, Ont., 1987), p. 13.
14. Report of the Study Group on Environmental Assessment Hearing Procedures, n. 6, p. 1.
15. Reforming Federal Environmental Assessment: A Discussion Paper, n. 17, pp. 17–21.
16. Evaluating Environmental Impact Assessment: An Action Prospectus, n. 2, p. 4.
17. David W.I. Marshall, William A. Rose, and Barry Sadler. “On Scoping in EARP” (Vancouver. B.C. FEARO Draft Report. 1986).
18. Evaluating Environmental Impact Assessment: An Action Prospectus, n. 2, p. 3.
19. C.S. Holling, ed. Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management: A New Approach Environmental Impact Assessment (Toronto, Ont.: Wiley, 1978).
20. R.J. Malvern, W.M. Paterson, and L.F. Cattrysse, Ontario Hydro's Experience with Environmental Approvals (Toronto, Ont.: Ontario Hydro, for the Canadian Electrical Association, 1990).
21. Francois Bregha, Jamie Benidickson, Don Gamble, Tom Shillington, and Ed Weick, The Integration of Environmental Considerations into Government Policy (Hull, Que.: Canadian Environmental Assessment Research Council, 1990), p. 2.
22. National Consultation Workshop on Federal Environmental Assessment Reform: Report of Proceedings, n. 11, p. 8.
23. Report of the Study Group on Environmental Assessment Hearing Procedures, n. 6, p. 38.