Ensuring Research Integrity: An Editor’s Perspective

Journal of Management

Volumn 42, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 1037-1043

  Wright, Patrick M ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

data fraud; ethics; peer review; publishing; publishing ethics; questionable research practices; research ethics; retractions; tenure

Indexed keywords

EID: 84977138773     PISSN: 01492063     EISSN: 15571211     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0149206316643931     Document Type: Editorial

References (7)

1. A.Bandura2012. On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited. Journal of Management, 38: 9-44.
2. R.F.BaumeisterC.N.DeWallN.L.CiaroccoJ.M.Twenge2006. Social exclusion impairs self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88: 589-604.
3. M.De RondA.N.Miller2005. Publish or perish: Bane or boon of academic life?Journal of Management Inquiry, 14: 321-329.
4. T.A.KrepsB.Monin2011. “Doing well by doing good?” Ambivalent moral framing in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 31: 99-123.
5. B.C.MartinsonM.S.AndersonR.de Vries2005. Scientists behaving badly. Nature, 435: 737-738.
6. T.MayerN.Steneck (Eds.). 2012. Promoting research integrity in a global environment. Singapore: World Scientific.
7. J.P.SimmonsL.D.NelsonU.Simonsohn2011. False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22: 1359-1366.