Climate for culture: Assessing the impact of climate change on the future indoor climate in historic buildings using simulations

Heritage Science

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Leissner, Johanna ^a   Kilian, Ralf ^a   Kotova, Lola ^b   Jacob, Daniela ^b   Mikolajewicz, Uwe ^c   Broström, Tor ^d   Ashley Smith, Jonathan ^e   Schellen, Henk L ^f   Martens, Marco ^f   Van Schijndel, Jos ^f   Antretter, Florian ^a   Winkler, Matthias ^a   Bertolin, Chiara ^g   Camuffo, Dario ^g   Simeunovic, Goran ^h   Vyhlídal, Tomáš ^h  

^a FRAUNHOFER GESELLSCHAFT   (Germany)

^b INSTITUTE OF MATERIALS RESEARCH   (Germany)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR METEOROLOGY   (Germany)

^d UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^e Technical University Eindhoven ^*  (United Kingdom)

^f EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^g CNR   (Italy)

^h CZECH TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY IN PRAGUE   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Climate change; Damage and risk assessment; High resolution climate modelling; Indoor climates; Whole building simulation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84977090597     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20507445     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s40494-015-0067-9     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Climate for Culture: http://www.climateforculture.eu. Accessed 21 Oct 2015.
2. Kilian R, Leissner J, Antretter F, Holl K, Holm A. Modelling climate change impact on cultural heritage-The European project Climate for Culture. In: Bunnik T et al, editors Effect of climate change on built heritage. Pfaffenhofen: WTA Publications, Vol., 34, 2010. p. 131-143.
3. Climate for Culture: Public Deliverables for WP1, WP3, WP4, WP5, WP7. http://www.climateforculture.eu/index.php?inhalt=furtherresources. projectresults. Accessed 19 Oct 2015.
4. Jacob D, Elizalde A, Haensler A, Hagemann S, Kumar P, Podzun R, Rechid D, Remedio AR, Saeed F, Sieck K, Teichmann C, Wilhelm C. Assessing the transferability of the regional climate model REMO to different coordinated regional climate downscaling experiment (CORDEX) regions. Atmosphere. 2012;3:181-99.
5. IPCC SRES. In: Nakicenovic N, Swart R, editors. Special Report on Emissions Scenarios: a special report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. UK: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
6. Towards new scenarios for analysis of emissions, climate change, impacts and response strategies. Technical summary, IPCC expert meeting report 2007; https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/supporting-material/expert-meeting-tsscenarios.pdf. Accessed 2 Apr 2015.
7. Bichlmair S, Kilian R, Krus M: Concept of a new airing strategy and simulation of the expected indoor climate in Linderhof Palace. In: CLIMA 2013: 11th REHVA World Congress 0& 8th International Conference on IAQVEC; Energy Efficient, Smart and Healthy Buildings; 2013, Prague: Czech Republic.
8. Antretter F, Kilian R. WUFI® PLUS: Werkzeuge zur Vorhersage des hygrothermischen Raumklimas in historischen Gebäuden. Restauro. 2014;120:42-3.
9. de Wit M. Hambase, Heat, air and moisture model for buildings and systems evaluation. Eindhoven University Press 2006. 2008; ISBN 90-6814-601-7 http://sts.bwk.tue.nl/hamlab/readers/bouwsteen100.pdf. Accessed 13 Apr 2015.
10. van Schijndel AWM. A review of the application of SimuLink S-functions to multi domain modeling and building simulation. J Building Perform Simul. 2014;7(3):165-78.
11. Lengsfeld K, Holm A. Entwicklung und Validierung einer hygrothermischen Raumklima-Simulationssoftware WUFI® Plus. Bauphysik. 2007;29:178-86.
12. Kilian R: Klimastabilität historischer Gebäude. Bewertung hygrothermischer Simulationen im Kontext der Präventiven Konservierung. Dissertation, Universität Stuttgart, 2013.
13. Kramer RP, van Schijndel AWM, Schellen HL. Inverse modeling of simplified hygrothermal building models to predict and characterize indoor climates. Build Environ. 2013;68:87-99.
14. Lankester P, Brimblecombe P. Future thermohygrometric climate within historic houses. J Cult Herit. 2012;12:1-6.
15. Earth's CO2 Home Page. http://co2now.org/current-co2/co2-now/earthshome-page-for-atmospheric-co2.html. Accessed 2 Apr 2015.
16. IPCC: Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Geneva, Switzerland. http://ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/. Accessed 2 Apr 2015.
17. Bertolin C, Camuffo D. Deliverable 5.2 Climate change impact on movable and immovable cultural heritage throughout Europe; 2014:15-18. http://www.climateforculture.eu/index.php?inhalt=furtherresources.projectresults. Accessed 21 Oct 2015.
18. Winkler M. Development of an automated damage risk assessment method for the evaluation of the climate change impact on historic buildings and their interiors in Europe. Master's Thesis. University of Applied Sciences Munich; 2013.
19. Huijbregts Z, Kramer RP, Martens MHJ, van Schijndel AWM, Schellen HL. A proposed method to assess the damage risk of future climate change to museum objects in historic buildings. Build Environ. 2012;55:43-56.
20. Livingston, RA: Development of Air pollution damage functions. In: Baer NS, Snethlage R, editors. Saving our architectural heritage: The conservation of historic stone sculptures. New York: John Wiley 1996. p. 37-62.
21. Brimblecombe P, Grossi CM. Millennium-long damage to building materials in London. Sci Total Environ. 2009;407:1354-61.
22. Sabbioni C, Brimblecombe P, Cassar M. The atlas of climate change impact on European cultural heritage: scientific analysis and management strategies. Anthem Press; 2012.
23. Vereecken E, Roels S. Review of mould prediction models and their influence on mould risk evaluation. Build Environ. 2012;51:296-310.
24. Bratasz L: Acceptable and non-acceptable microclimate variability: the case of wood. In: Camuffo D, Fassina V and Havermans, editors. Basic environmental mechanisms affecting cultural heritage. Understanding deterioration mechanisms for conservation process, COST Action D 42. Chemical interactions between cultural artefacts and indoor environment. 2010. p. 49-58.
25. Luxford N, Strlic M, Thickett D. Safe display parameters for veneer and marquetry objects: a review of the available information for wooden collections. Stud Conserv. 2013;58(No1):1-12.
26. Bratasz L. Allowable microclimatic variations for painted wood. Stud Conserv. 2013;58(2):65-79.
27. Brimblecombe P, Grossi CM. Potential damage to modern building materials from 21st century air pollution. Scient World J. 2010;10:116-25.
28. Bonazza A, Messina P, Sabbioni C, Grossi CM, Brimblecombe P. Mapping the impact of climate change on surface recession of carbonate buildings in Europe. Sci Total Environ. 2009;407:2039-50.
29. Menart E, De Bruin G, Strlic M. Dose-response functions for historic paper. Polym Degrad Stab. 2011;96:2029-39.
30. Ashley-Smith J: Deliverable 4.2 Report on damage functions in relation to climate change; 2013;21-38 http://www.climateforculture.eu/index.php?inhalt=furtherresources.projectresults. Accessed 21 Oct 2015.
31. Martens MHJ. Climate risk assessment in museums: degradation risks determined from temperature and relative humidity data. Dissertation. Eindhoven University of Technology; 2012.
32. Sedlbauer K. Prediction of mould fungus formation on the surface of and inside building components. Fraunhofer Institute for Building Physics, Holzkirchen, Germany; 2001. http://www.ibp.fraunhofer.de/content/dam/ibp/en/documents/ks_dissertation_etcm1021-30729.pdf; Accessed 2 Apr 2015.
33. Viitanen H, Ojanen, T: Improved Model to Predict Mold Growth in Building Materials. ASHRAE, 2007.
34. Ojanen T et al: Mold growth modeling of building structures using sensitivity classes of materials. ASHRAE, 2010.
35. Krus M, Seidler CM, Sedlbauer K: Comparative evaluation of the predictions of two established mold growth models. ASHRAE Buildings XI Conference, 2010.
36. Krus M, Seidler CM, Sedlbauer K: Übertragung des Mould-Indexes auf das Biohygrothermische Modell zur Schimmelpilzvorhersage. Gesundheitsingenieur 2011, 132(Heft 1): 32-36.
37. Climate for Culture decision support system ExDSS. http://cfc.exdss.org/dss/riskcon. Accessed 15 Apr 2015.