|
Volumn 105, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 1449-1451
|
Social and ethical implications of fertility preservation
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
CANCER CELL;
CANCER PATIENT;
CANCER SURVIVOR;
CLINICAL PRACTICE;
CRYOPRESERVATION;
EDITORIAL;
FERTILITY PRESERVATION;
GAMETE;
HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL;
HUMAN;
LONG TERM CARE;
MEDICAL ETHICS;
OOCYTE;
OVARIAN TISSUE;
PREGNANCY;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
RISK FACTOR;
SOCIAL ASPECT;
SPERM DONOR;
DIRECT-TO-CONSUMER ADVERTIZING;
ETHICS;
FEMALE;
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT;
HEALTH CARE DELIVERY;
HEALTH CARE QUALITY;
IN VITRO FERTILIZATION;
MALE;
SPERMATOZOON;
CRYOPRESERVATION;
DIRECT-TO-CONSUMER ADVERTISING;
FEMALE;
FERTILITY PRESERVATION;
FERTILIZATION IN VITRO;
HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY;
HUMANS;
MALE;
MARKETING OF HEALTH SERVICES;
OOCYTES;
QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE;
SPERMATOZOA;
|
EID: 84977085412
PISSN: 00150282
EISSN: 15565653
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.002 Document Type: Editorial |
Times cited : (12)
|
References (5)
|