Determining the best appropriate level of endometrial thickness in the outcome of intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection

Journal of Babol University of Medical Sciences

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 15-21

  Basirat, Z ^a   Esmailzadeh, S ^a   Jorsaraei, S G A ^a   Firoozpour, M ^a   Abdolhashempour, S ^a  

^a BABOL UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

Endometrial pattern; Endometrial thickness; Infertility; Intra cytoplasmic sperm injection

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; ENDOMETRIAL THICKNESS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFERTILITY; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL AGE; PREGNANCY RATE; TRANSVAGINAL ECHOGRAPHY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84977080621     PISSN: 15614107     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Yaman C, Ebner T, Sommergruber M, Polz W, Tews G. Role of three dimensional ultrasonographic measurement of endometrium volume as a predictor of pregnancy outcome in an IVF-ET program: a preliminary study. Fertil Steril 2000;74(4):797-801.
2. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States and Canada: 1994 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry. Fertil Steril 1996;66(5):697-705.
3. Kovacs P, Matyas S, Boda K, Kaali SG. The effect of endometrial thickness on IVF/ICSI outcome. Hum Reprod 2003;18(11):2337-41.
4. Check JH, Nowroozi K, Choe J, Lurie D, Dietterich C. The effect of endometrial thickness and echo pattern on in vitro fertilization outcome in donor oocyte-embryo transfer cycle. Fertil Steril 1993;59(1):72-5.
5. Remohi J, Ardiles G, Garcia-Velasco JA, Gaitan P, Simon C, Pellicer A. Endometrial thickness and serum oestradiol concentrations as predictors of outcome in oocyte donation. Hum Reprod 1997;12(10):2271-6.
6. Weissman A, Gotlieb L, Casper RF. The detrimental effect of increased endometrial thickness on implantation and pregnancy rates and outcome in an in vitro fertilization program. Fertil Steril 1999;71(1):147-9.
7. Schild RL, Indefrei D, Eschweiler S, Van der Ven H, Fimmers R, Hansmann M. Three-dimensional endometrial volume calculation and pregnancy rate in an in vitro fertilization programme. Hum Reprod 1999;14(5):1255-8.
8. De Geyter C, Schmitter M, De Geyter M, Nieschlag E, Holzgreve W, Schneider HP. Prospective evaluation of the ultrasound appearance of the endometrium in a cohort of 1,186 infertile women. Fertil Steril 2000;73(1):106-13.
9. Puerto B, Creus M, Carmona F, Civico S, Vanrell JA, Balasch J. Ultrasonography as a predictor of embryo implantation after in vitro fertilization: a controlled study. Fertil Steril 2003;79(4):1015-22.
10. Fanchin R, Righini C, Ayoubi JM, Olivennes F, de Ziegler D, Frydman R. New look at endometrial echogenicity: objective computer-assisted measurements predict endometrial receptivity in in vitro fertilizationembryo transfer. Fertil Steril 2000;74(2):274-81.
11. Hock DL, Bohrer MK, Ananth CV, Kemmann E. Sonographic assessment of endometrial pattern and thickness in patients treated with clomiphene citrate, human menopausal gonadotropins, and intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 1997;68(2):242-5.
12. Basir GS, O WS, So WW, Ng EH, Ho PC. Evaluation of cycle-to-cycle variation of endometrial responsiveness using transvaginal sonography in women undergoing assisted reproduction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002;19:484-9.
13. Detti L, Yelian FD, Kruger ML, Diamond MP, Puscheck EE. Endometrial thickness dynamics and morphologic characteristics during pituitary downregulation with antagonists in assisted reproductive technology cycles. J Ultrasound Med 2008;27(11):1591-6.
14. Vera JA, Arguello B, Crisosto CA. Predictive value of endometrial pattern and thickness in the result of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol 1995;60(3):195-8.
15. Yaman C, Ebner T, Jesacher K, Sommergruber M, Radner G, Tews G. Sonographic measurement of endometrium thickness as a predictive value for pregnancy through IVF. Ultraschall Med 2002;23(4):256-9.
16. Singh N, Bahadur A, Mittal S, Malhotra N, Bhatt A. Predictive value of endometrial thickness, pattern and subendometrial blood flows on the day of hCG by 2D doppler in in-vitro fertilization cycles: A prospective clinical study from a tertiary care unit. J Hum Reprod Sci 2011;4(1):29-33.
17. Traub ML, Van Arsdale A, Pal L, Jindal S, Santoro N. Endometrial thickness, Caucasian ethnicity, and age predict clinical pregnancy following fresh blastocyst embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort. Reprod Biol Endocrin 2009;7:33.
18. Mehrafza M, Asgharnia M, Heidarzadeh A, Oudi M, Rezasefat A, Hosseini A. The role of endometrial thickness on interacytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes. J Reprod Infertility 2006;7(27):117-24.
19. Rashidi BH, Sadeghi M, Jafarabadi M, Nejad ES. Relationships between pregnancy rates following in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection and endometrial thickness and pattern. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2004;120(2):179-84.
20. Kinay T, Tasci Y, Dilbaz S, Cinar O, Demir B, Haberal A. The relationship between endometrial thickness and pregnancy rates in GNRH antagonist down-regulated ICSI cycles. Gynecol Endocrinol 2010;26(11):833-7.
21. Chen SL, Wu FR, Luo C, et al. Combined analysis of endometrial thickness and pattern in predicting outcome of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study. Reprod Biol Endocrin 2010;8:30.
22. Dietterich C, Check JH, Choe JK, Nazeri A, Lurie D. Increased endometrial thickness on the day of human chronic gonadotropin injection does not adversely affect pregnancy or implantation rates following in vitro fertilization- embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 2002;77(4):781-6.
23. Al-Ghamdi A, Coskun S, Al-Hassan S, AL-Rejjal R, Awartani K. The correlation between endometrial thickness and outcome of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) outcome. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2008;6(4):37.