Predicting Recidivism: An Evaluation of the Wisconsin Juvenile Probation and Aftercare Risk Instrument

Criminal Justice and Behavior

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 1988, Pages 141-151

  Ashford, José B ^a   Lecroy, Craig Winston ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84976980787     PISSN: 00938548     EISSN: 15523594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0093854888015002002     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Baird, S. C. (1981). Probation and parole classification: The Wisconsin model. Corrections Today, 43, 36-41.
2. Baird, S. C. (1975). Classification of juveniles in corrections: A model systems approach. Madison, WI: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
3. Baird, S. C. (1985). Classifying juveniles: Making the most out of an important management tool. Corrections Today, 47, 32-38.
4. Bonham, Jr., Janedsela, G., Bardo, J., & Iacovetta, R. (1984). Predicting parole outcome via discriminant analysis. Justice Quarterly, 1, 329-342.
5. Clear, T., & Gallagher, K. W. (1983). Management problems in risk screening devices in probation and parole. Evaluation Review.
6. Gottfredson, D. (1977). Assessment methods. In S. L. Radzinowicz & M. E. Wolfgang (Eds.), In crime and justice: The criminal under restraint (Vol. 1, pp. 79-111). New York: Basic Books.
7. Huberty, C. J. (1984). Issues in the use and interpretation of discriminant analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 156-171.
8. Klecka, W. R. (1980). Discriminant analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
9. Klein, S. P., & Caggiano, M. N. (1986). The prevalence, predictability, and policy implications of recidivism. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
10. Petersilia, J., Turner, S., & Peterson, J. (1986). Unpublished RAND research in process.