Email communication at the medical primary-secondary care interface: A qualitative exploration

British Journal of General Practice

Volumn 66, Issue 648, 2016, Pages e467-e473

  Sampson, Rod ^a   Barbour, Rosaline ^b   Wilson, Philip ^c  

^a Cairn Medical Practice Ardlarich   (United Kingdom)

^b OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Email; Interface; Patient care; Primary health care; Relationship; Secondary care.

Indexed keywords

CASE REPORT; CONSULTATION; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; E-MAIL; HUMAN; PATIENT CARE; PERCEPTION; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SCOTLAND; SECONDARY HEALTH CARE; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; SKILL; THEMATIC ANALYSIS; WORKLOAD; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT REFERRAL; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PILOT STUDY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; ELECTRONIC MAIL; HUMANS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PILOT PROJECTS; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION; SCOTLAND; SECONDARY CARE;

EID: 84976873343     PISSN: 09601643     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16X685273     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Car J, Sheikh A. Email consultations in health care: 1 - scope and effectiveness. BMJ 2004; 329(7463): 435-438.
2. Davis K, McEvoy Doty MM, Shea K, Stremikis K. Health information technology and physician perceptions of quality of care and satisfaction. Health Policy 2009; 90(2-3): 239-246.
3. Hanna L, May C, Fairhurst K. The place of information and communication technology-mediated consultations in primary care: GPs' perspectives. Fam Pract 2012; 29(3): 361-366.
4. Stutchfield BM, Jagilly R, Tulloh BR. Second opinions in remote surgical practice using email and digital photography. ANZ J Surg 2007; 77(11): 1009-1012.
5. Hughes JA, Pakieser RA. Factors that impact nurses' use of electronic mail (e-mail). Comput Nurs 1999; 17(6): 251-258.
6. Goodyear-Smith F, Wearn A, Everts H, et al. Pandora's electronic box: GPs reflect upon email communication with their patients. Inform Prim Care 2005; 13(3): 195-202.
7. Walter G, Cleary M, Rey JM. Patterns of use, attitudes and expectations of mental health staff regarding computers. J Qual Clin Pract 2000; 20(1): 20-23.
8. Parekh SG, Nazarian DG, Lim CK. Adoption of information technology by resident physicians. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; 421: 107-111.
9. Cooke M, Williams SJ, Esain A. Lean email: Applying 5S to emails. BMJ Careers 2010. http://careers.bmj.com/careers/advice/Lean-email%3A-applying-5S-to-emails (accessed 29 Apr 2016).
10. Sittig DF. Results of a content analysis of electronic messages (email) sent between patients and their physicians. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2003; 3: 11.
11. Katz SJ, Moyer CA, Cox DT, Stern DT. Effect of a triage-based e-mail system on clinic resource use and patient and physician satisfaction in primary care. A randomized controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med 2003; 18(9): 736-744.
12. Beebe TJ, Locke GR 3rd, Barnes SA, et al. Mixing web and mail methods in a survey of physicians. Health Serv Res 2007; 42(3 Pt 1): 1219-1234.
13. Russell J, Greenhalgh T, Boynton P, Rigby M. Information in practice. Soft networks for bridging the gap between research and practice: Illuminative evaluation of CHAIN. BMJ 2004; 328(7449): 1174.
14. Karhula T, Kauppila T, Elonheimo O, et al. Use of email in communication between the Finnish primary healthcare system and general practitioners. Inform Prim Care 2011; 19(1): 25-32.
15. NHS Highland. About NHS Highland. www.nhshighland.scot.nhs.uk/AboutUs/ Pages/AboutUs.aspx (accessed 29 Apr 2016).
16. Barbour R. Introducing qualitative research: A student's guide. 2nd edn. London: Sage, 2014.
17. Scottish Government. Scottish government urban rural classification 2013-2014. http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2014/11/2763 (accessed 29 Apr 2016).
18. Barbour R. Introducing qualitative research: A student guide to the craft of doing qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 2008.
19. ISD Scotland. GP workforce & practice populations. http://www.isdscotland.org/Health-Topics/General-Practice/Workforce-and-Practice-Populations/ (accessed 29 Apr 2016).
20. Ritchie J, Lewis J, Elam G. Designing and selecting samples. In: Ritchie J, Lewis J, eds. Qualitative research practice. A guide for social science students and researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2003: 77-108.
21. Strauss AL, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1990.
22. Richards H, Emslie C. The 'doctor' or the 'girl from the university'? Considering the influence of professional roles on qualitative interviewing. Fam Pract 2000; 17(1): 71-75.
23. Hussey S, Hoddinott P, Wilson P, et al. Sickness certification system in the United Kingdom: Qualitative study of views of general practitioners in Scotland. BMJ 2004; 328(7431): 88-92.
24. Waldren SE, Kibbe DC. Email in clinical care. BMJ 2004; 329(7471): E325-E326; discussion E327.
25. Worth ER, Patrick TB. Do electronic mail discussion lists act as virtual colleagues? AMIA 1997; 8280(97): 325-329.
26. Torrance RJ, Lasome CE, Agazio JB. Ethics and computer-mediated communication: Implications for practice and policy. J Nurs Admin 2002; 32(6): 346-353.
27. Hill DS, Cowling L, Jackson F, et al. ED, email, emess! Emerg Med J 2013; 30(1): 68-69.
28. Prior L. 'Repositioning documents in social research'. Sociology 2008; 42(5): 821-826.
29. Deodhar J. Telemedicine by email - experience in neonatal care at a primary care facility in rural India. J Telemed Telecare 2002; 8(Suppl 2): 20-21.
30. Vassallo DJ, Hoque F, Roberts MF, et al. An evaluation of the first year's experience with a low-cost telemedicine link in Bangladesh. J Telemed Telecare 2001; 7(3): 125-138.
31. Lee S, Broderick TJ, Haynes J, et al. The role of low-bandwidth telemedicine in surgical prescreening. J Pediatric Surg 2003; 38(9): 1281-1283.
32. Jones SM, Milroy C, Pickford MA. Telemedicine in acute plastic surgical trauma and burns. Ann R Coll Surg Eng 2004; 86(4): 239-242.
33. Dill SW, Digiovanna JJ. Changing paradigms in dermatology: Information technology. Clin Derm 2003; 21(5): 375-382.
34. Brauchli K, Jagilly R, Oberli H, et al. Telepathology on the Solomon Islands - two years' experience with a hybrid web- and email-based telepathology system. J Telemed Telecare 2004; 10(Suppl 1): 14-17.
35. Car J, Sheikh A. Email consultations in health care: 2 - acceptability and safe application. BMJ 2004; 329(7463): 439-442.
36. University College London Hospitals NHS. New, secure nhs.net email addresses for UCLH. http://www.uclh.nhs.uk/HP/GPNEWS/Pages/NewsecurenhsnetemailaddressesforUCLH.aspx (accessed 29 Apr 2016).
37. GOV.UK. The Data Protection Act. https://www.gov.uk/data-protection/the-dataprotection-act (accessed 29 Apr 2016).
38. Department of Health. Report on the review of patient-identifiable information - Caldicott Report. 1997. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130107105354/http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH-4068403 (accessed 29 Apr 2016).
39. Department of Health. Confidentiality. NHS code of practice. 2003. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment-data/file/200146/Confidentiality-NHS-Code-of-Practice.pdf (accessed 29 Apr 2016).
40. General Medical Council. Confidentiality guidance: Protecting information. http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/ethical-guidance/confidentiality-12-16-protecting-information.asp (accessed 29 Apr 2016).