Exploring performance of the integrated project delivery process on complex building projects

International Journal of Project Management

Volumn 34, Issue 7, 2016, Pages 1089-1101

  Mesa, Harrison A ^a,b   Molenaar, Keith R ^a,c   Alarcón, Luis F ^b,c  

^a University of Colorado at Boulder   (United States)

^b PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE   (Chile)

^c NONE   (Chile)

Author keywords

Integrated project delivery; Project delivery; Supply chain relationships

Indexed keywords

CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY; PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

IMPACT ASSESSMENTS; INTEGRATED PROJECT DELIVERIES; PERFORMANCE EXPECTATIONS; PROJECT DELIVERY; PROJECT DELIVERY SYSTEMS; PROJECT PERFORMANCE; SUPPLY CHAIN RELATIONSHIPS; SUPPLY-CHAIN INTEGRATION;

SUPPLY CHAINS;

BUILDING; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84976869568     PISSN: 02637863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.05.007     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. AIA National, and AIA California C., Integrated Project Delivery: A Guide, The American Institute of Architects. http://www.ipd-ca.net/images/IPDeliveryGuide_final_revised.pdf, 2007 (01/25, 2011).
2. AIA National, and AIA California C., Integrated Project Delivery: case studies. http://www.klingstubbins.com/ks_testsite/about/pdfs_articles/Jan_01_10_AIA_IPD%20CaseStudies_Autodesk.pdf, 2010 (4/20, 2012).
3. Alarcón, L.F., Ashley, D.B., Project performance modeling: a methodology for evaluating project execution strategies. Source Document 80, 1992, Construction Industry Institute, The University of Texas at Austin (210 pp.).
4. Alarcón, L., Ashley, D., Modeling project performance for decision making. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 122:3 (1996), 265–273.
5. Alarcón, L.F., Ashley, D.B., Project management decision making using cross-impact analysis. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 16:3 (1998), 145–152 (1998).
6. Alarcón, L.F., Bastías, A., A Computer Environment to Support the Strategic Decision-Making Process in Construction Firms. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 7(1), 2000, Blackwell-Science, 63–75.
7. Alarcón, L., Mourgues, C., Performance modeling for contractor selection. J. Manag. Eng. 18:2 (2002), 52–60.
8. Alarcón, I., Chritian, D., Tommelein, I., Collaborating with a permitting agency to deliver a healthcare project: case study of the Sutter Medical Center Castro Valley (SMCCV). Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction IGLC 19, Lima, Peru, July 13–15, 2011.
9. ASCE, Quality in the Constructed Project: A Guide for Owners, Designers and Constructors. second ed, 2000, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia.
10. Bayliss, R., Cheung, S., Suen, H.C.H., Wong, S., Effective partnering tools in construction: a case study on MTRC TKE contract 604 in Hong Kong. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 22:3 (2004), 253–263.
11. Bennett, J., Jayes, S., Trusting the Team: The Best Practice Guide to Partnering in Construction. 1995, Reading Construction Forum, Reading.
12. Bennett, J., Jayes, S., The Seven Pillars of Partnering: A Guide to Second Generation Partnering. 1998, Thomas Telford Publishers, London.
13. Black, C., Akintoye, A., Fitzgerald, E., An analysis of success factors and benefits of partnering in construction. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 18:6 (2000), 423–434.
14. Brown, J., Partnering to save troubled projects. J. Manag. Eng. 10:3 (1994), 22–25.
15. Calhoun, M., Hallowell, M., Interrelationships among construction injury prevention strategies: a cross-impact analysis. Construction Research Congress 2010, 2010, 1264–1273.
16. Chan, A.P.C., Chan, D.W.M., Ho, K.S.K., An empirical study of the benefits of construction partnering in Hong Kong. Constr. Manag. Econ. 21:5 (2003), 523–533.
17. Chan, A.P.C., Chan, D.W.M., Chiang, Y.H., Tang, B.S., Chan, E.H.W., Ho, K.S.K., Exploring critical success factors for partnering in construction projects. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 130:2 (2004), 188–198.
18. Chan, A., Chan, D., Yeung, J., Relational Contracting for Construction Excellence. 2010, Spon Press, London.
19. Cheng, E., Li, H., Love, P., Establishment of critical success factors for construction partnering. J. Manag. Eng. 16:2 (2000), 84–92.
20. Christopher, M., Logistics and Supply Chain Management: Strategies for Reducing Costs and Improving Service. 1992, Pitman Publishing, London.
21. Cole, R.J., Building environmental assessment methods: assessing construction practices. Constr. Manag. Econ. 18:8 (2000), 949–957.
22. Construction Industry Institute (Australia) (CII), Partnering: Models for Success. 1996, Partnering Task Force, Construction Industry Institute, Australia.
23. Construction Industry Institute (CII), In search of partnering excellence. Publication No. 17–1, Report CII, Austin, TX, 1991.
24. Darrington, J., Lichtig, W.A., Rethinking the “G” in GMP: why estimated maximum price contracts make sense on collaborative projects. Constr. Lawyer 30:2 (2010), 1–12.
25. Das, T.K., Teng, B., Between trust and control: developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23:3 (1998), 491–512.
26. Dorsey, R.W., Project Delivery Systems for Building Construction. 1997, Associated Genereal Contractors of America.
27. Egan, J., Rethinking Construction. 1998, Construction Task force, London, UK (Retreived May 8, 2013: http://www.architecture.com/Files/RIBAHoldings/PolicyAndInternationalRelations/Policy/PublicAffairs/RethinkingConstruction.pdf).
28. El Asmar, M., Hanna, A., Loh, W., Quantifying performance for the integrated project delivery system as compared to established delivery systems. J. Constr. Eng. Manag., 139(11), 2013, 04013012.
29. Eriksson, P.E., Westerberg, M., Effects of cooperative procurement procedures on construction project performance: a conceptual framework. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 29:2 (2011), 197–208.
30. Gilbreath, R.D., Managing Construction Contracts: Operational Control for Commercial Risks. second ed, 1992, John. Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y.
31. Hale, D.R., Shrestha, P.P., Gibson, J., Edward, G., Migliaccio, G.C., Empirical comparison of design/build and design/bid/build project delivery methods. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 135:7 (2009), 579–587.
32. Hallowell, M., Gambatese, J., Qualitative research: application of the Delphi method to CEM research. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 136:1 (2010), 99–107.
33. Hellard, R.B., The partnering philosophy – a procurement strategy for satisfaction through a team work solution to project quality. J. Constr. Procure. 2:1 (1996), 41–55.
34. Ibbs, C., Kwak, Y., Ng, T., Odabasi, A., Project delivery systems and project change: quantitative analysis. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 129:4 (2003), 382–386.
35. Ireland, V., Virtually meaningless distinctions between nominally different procurement methods. CIB W65 Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Organization and Management of Construction, 1984.
36. Iyer, K.C., Jha, K.N., Factors affecting cost performance: evidence from Indian construction projects. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 23:4 (2005), 283–295.
37. Jackson, B.J., Design–Build Essentials, Delmar, Cengage Learning, New York, USA. 2011.
38. Kenig, M.E., Project Delivery Systems for Construction. 2011, The Associated General Contractors of America, Arlington.
39. Kim, Y., Dossick, C.S., What makes the delivery of a project integrated? a case study of Children's Hospital, Bellevue, WA. Lean Constr. J., 2011, 53–66.
40. Konchar, M., Sanvido, V., Comparison of US project delivery systems. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. ASCE 124:6 (1998), 435–444.
41. Larson, E., Partnering on construction projects: a study of the relationship between partnering activities and project success. Eng. Manag. IEEE Trans. 44:2 (1997), 188–195.
42. Latham, M., Constructing the Team, Final Report of the Joint Review of Procurement and Contractual Arrangements in the United Kingdom Construction Industry. 1994, HMSO, London.
43. Li, H., Cheng, E.W.L., Love, P.E.D., Irani, Z., Co-operative benchmarking: a tool for partnering excellence in construction. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 19:3 (2001), 171–179.
44. Lichtig, W.A., The integrated agreement for lean project delivery. Constr. Lawyer 26:3 (2006), 1–8.
45. Love, P., Davis, P., Chevis, R., Edwards, D., Risk/reward compensation model for civil engineering infrastructure alliance projects. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 137:2 (2011), 127–136.
46. Meng, X., The effect of relationship management on project performance in construction. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 30:2 (2012), 188–198.
47. Meng, X., Sun, M., Jones, M., Maturity model for supply chain relationships in construction. J. Manag. Eng. 27:2 (2011), 97–105.
48. Mitropoulos, P., Tatum, C., Management-driven integration. J. Manag. Eng. 16:1 (2000), 48–58.
49. Moore, D.R., Dainty, A.R.J., Work-group communication patterns in design and build project teams: an investigative framework. J. Constr. Procure. 6:1 (2000), 44–55.
50. Phua, F.T.T., Rowlinson, S., How important is cooperation to construction project success? A grounded empirical quantification. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 11:1 (2004), 45–54.
51. Rahman, M.M., Kumaraswamy, M.M., Relational contracting and teambuilding: assessing potential contractual and noncontractual incentives. J. Manag. Eng. 24:1 (2008), 48–63.
52. Rahman, M.M., Kumaraswamy, M.M., Yng Ling, F.Y., Building a relational contracting culture and integrated teams. Can. J. Civ. Eng. 34:1 (2007), 75–88.
53. Rowlinson, S., Cheung, Y.K.F., Success factors in an alliance contract: a case study in Australia. International Conference of AUBEA/COBRA/CIB Student Chapter, 2005.
54. Sanders, S.R., Moore, M.M., Perceptions on partnering in the public sector. Proj. Manag. J. 22:4 (1992), 13–19.
55. Shen, L.Y., Tam, V.W.Y., Implementation of environmental management in the Hong Kong construction industry. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 20:7 (2002), 535–543.
56. Tang, W., Duffield, C.F., Young, D.M., Partnering mechanism in construction: an empirical study on the Chinese construction industry. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 132:3 (2006), 217–229.
57. The Construction Users Round Table (CURT), Collaboration, integrated information and the project jifecycle in building design, construction and operation., 2004 Retreived May 8, 2013: http://codebim.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/CurtCollaboration.pdf.
58. Thomas, S.R., Macken, C.L., Chung, T.H., Kim, I., Measuring the impacts of the delivery system on project performance – design–build and design–bid–build. http://fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build02/PDF/b02150.pdf, 2002 (09/27, 2011).
59. Thomsen, D.,.J., Dunne, D., Lichtig, W.A., Managing integrated project delivery. http://cmaanet.org/files/shared/ng_Integrated_Project_Delivery__11–19-09__2_.pdf, 2009 (2010).
60. Tran, D., Molenaar, K., Alarcón, L., A hybrid cross-impact approach to predicting cost variance of project delivery decisions for highways. J. Infrastruct. Syst., 04015017, 2015.
61. Venegas, P., Alarcón, L.F., Selecting long-term strategies for construction firms. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 123:4 (1997), 388–398.
62. Walker, D., Hampson, K., Procurement Strategies: A Relationship-Based Approach. 2003, Blackwell, Oxford.
63. Wong, W.K., Cheung, S.O., Yiu, T.W., Pang, H.Y., A framework for trust in construction contracting. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 26:8 (2008), 821–829.
64. Xue, X., Li, X., Shen, Q., Wang, Y., An agent-based framework for supply chain coordination in construction. Autom. Constr. 14:3 (2005), 413–430.
65. Xue, X., Shen, Q., Ren, Z., Critical review of collaborative working in construction projects: business environment and human behaviors. J. Manag. Eng. 26:4 (2010), 196–208.
66. Zimina, D., Ballard, G., Pasquire, C., Target value design: using collaboration and a lean approach to reduce construction cost. Constr. Manag. Econ. 30:5 (2012), 383–398.