Integrality and Separability of Input Devices

ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI)

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 1994, Pages 3-26

  Jacob, Robert J K ^a   Sibert, Linda E ^a   McFarlane, Daniel C ^a   Mullen, M Preston ^a  

^a NAVAL RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

gesture input; input devices; integrality; interaction techniques; perceptual space; Polhemus tracker; separability

Indexed keywords

EID: 84976672490     PISSN: 10730516     EISSN: 15577325     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/174630.174631     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. ACHILLE, L. B. 1990. Considerations in the design and development of a human computer interaction laboratory. NRL Rep. 9279, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C.
2. ATTNEAVE, F. 1950. Dimensions of similarity. Am. J. Psychol. 63, 516-556.
3. BLESER, T. W. 1991. An input device model of interactive systems design. Doctoral Dissertation, The George Washington Univ., Washington, D.C.
4. BLESER, T. W. AND SIBERT, J. L. 1990. Toto: A tool for selecting interaction techniques. In Proceedings of the ACM UIST ′90 Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM Press, New York, 135-142.
5. BUXTON, W. 1986. There's more to interaction than meets the eye: Some issues in manual input. In User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., 319-337.
6. CARD, S. K., MACKINLAY, J. D., AND ROBERTSON, G. G. 1991. A morphological analysis of the design space of input devices. ACM Trans. Inf. Sys. 9, 2, 99-122.
7. CARD, S. K., MORAN, T. P., AND NEWELL, A. 1983. The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J.
8. FOLEY, J. D., WALLACE, V. L. AND CHAN, P. 1984. The human factors of computer graphics interaction techniques. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 4, 11, 13-48.
9. GARNER, W. R. 1974. The Processing of Information and Structure. Lawrence Erlbaum, Potomac, Md.
10. GARNER, W. R. AND FELFOLDY, G. L. 1970. Integrality of stimulus dimensions in various types of information processing. Cog. Psychol. 1, 225-241.
11. GSPC. 1977. Status report of the Graphics Standards Planning Committee. Comput. Graph. 11.
12. HANDEL, S. AND IMAI, S. 1972. The free classification of analyzable and unanalyzable stimuli. Percep. Psychophy. 12, 108-116.
13. IMAI, S. AND GARNER, W. R. 1968. Structure in perceptual classification. Psychonom. Monograph Suppl. 2, 9, Whole No. 25.
14. JACOB, R. J. K. AND SIBERT, L. E. 1992. The perceptual structure of multidimensional input device selection. In Proceedings of the ACM CHI ′92 Human Factors in Computing Systems Conference. ACM Press, New York, 211-218.
15. MACKINLAY, J. D., CARD, S. K., AND ROBERTSON, G. G. 1990. A semantic analysis of the design space of input devices. Hum. Comput. Interact. 5, 145-190.
16. SHEPARD, R. N. 1964. Attention and the metric structure of the stimulus space. J. Math. Psychol. 1, 54-87.