Clarifying the project complexity construct: Past, present and future

International Journal of Project Management

Volumn 34, Issue 7, 2016, Pages 1199-1213

  Bakhshi, Javad ^a   Ireland, Vernon ^a   Gorod, Alex ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Complex projects; Complexity theories; Histogram analysis; Project complexity; System of systems; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

PROJECT MANAGEMENT; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

COMPLEX PROJECTS; COMPLEXITY THEORY; HISTOGRAM ANALYSIS; PROJECT COMPLEXITY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

SYSTEM OF SYSTEMS;

COMPLEXITY; HISTOGRAM; LITERATURE REVIEW; PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84976632091     PISSN: 02637863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.06.002     Document Type: Article

References (129)

1. Ahern, T., Leavy, B., Byrne, P.J., Complex project management as complex problem solving: a distributed knowledge management perspective. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 32:8 (2014), 1371–1381.
2. Akintoye, A., Analysis of factors influencing project cost estimating practice. Constr. Manag. Econ. 18:1 (2000), 77–89.
3. Alderman, N., Ivory, C., Partnering in major contracts: paradox and metaphor. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 25:4 (2007), 386–393.
4. Anderson, P., Perspective: complexity theory and organization science. Organ. Sci. 10:3 (1999), 216–232.
5. Antoniadis, D.N., Edum-Fotwe, F.T., Thorpe, A., Socio-organo complexity and project performance. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 29:7 (2011), 808–816.
6. Aritua, B., Smith, N.J., Bower, D., Construction client multi-projects — a complex adaptive systems perspective. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 27:1 (2009), 72–79.
7. Ashby, W.R., Requisite variety and its implications for the control of complex systems. Cybernetica 1 (1958), 83–99.
8. Ashby, W.R., Goldstein, J., Variety, constraint, and the law of requisite variety. Emergence Complex. Organ., 13(1/2), 2011, 190.
9. Austin, S., Newton, A., Steele, J., Waskett, P., Modelling and managing project complexity. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 20:3 (2002), 191–198.
10. Azim, S.W., Understanding and Managing Project Complexity. 2010, The University of Manchester.
11. Baccarini, D., The concept of project complexity—a review. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 14:4 (1996), 201–204.
12. Bakhshi, J., Exploring project complexities and their problems: a critical review of the literature. (Master of Philosophy thesis), 2016, The University of Adelaide, Australia.
13. Bakhshi, J., Ireland, V., Corral De Zubielqui, G., Exploring project complexities: a critical review of the literature. AIPM National Conference. Hobart, Australia, 2015.
14. Benbya, H., McKelvey, B., Using coevolutionary and complexity theories to improve IS alignment: a multi-level approach. J. Inf. Technol. 21:4 (2006), 284–298.
15. Boardman, J., Sauser, B., System of Systems — the meaning of of. 2006 IEEE/SMC International Conference on System of Systems Engineering, 2006, 118–123 (April).
16. Bosch-Rekveldt, M., Jongkind, Y., Mooi, H., Bakker, H., Verbraeck, A., Grasping project complexity in large engineering projects: the TOE (technical, organizational and environmental) framework. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 29:6 (2011), 728–739.
17. Brady, T., Davies, A., Managing structural and dynamic complexity: a tale of two projects. Proj. Manag. J. 45:4 (2014), 21–38.
18. Brady, T., Davies, A., Nightingale, P., Dealing with uncertainty in complex projects: revisiting Klein and Meckling. Int. J. Manag. Proj. Bus. 5:4 (2012), 718–736.
19. Braha, D., Minai, A.A., Bar-yam, Y., Complex Engineered Systems. 2006, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
20. Browning, T.R., Managing complex project process models with a process architecture framework. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 32:2 (2014), 229–241.
21. Burnes, B., Kurt Lewin and complexity theories: back to the future?. J. Chang. Manag. 4:4 (2004), 309–325.
22. Calinescu, A., Efstathiou, J., Schirn, J., Bermejo, J., Applying and assessing two methods for measuring complexity in manufacturing. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 49:7 (1998), 723–733.
23. Camci, A., Kotnour, T., Technology Complexity in Projects: Does Classical Project Management Work?. 2006 Technology Management for the Global Future — PICMET 2006 Conference, 2006, 2181–2186 (c).
24. Castejón-Limas, M., Ordieres-Meré, J., González-Marcos, A., González-Castro, V., Effort estimates through project complexity. Ann. Oper. Res. 186:1 (2010), 395–406.
25. Checkland, P., Systems thinking. Rethinking management information systems, 1999, 45–56.
26. Cicmil, S.J.K., Critical factors of effective project management. TQM Mag. 9:6 (1997), 390–396.
27. Cicmil, S., Marshall, D., Insights into collaboration at the project level: complexity, social interaction and procurement mechanisms. Build. Res. Inf., 33(6), 2005.
28. Cicmil, S., Williams, T., Thomas, J., Hodgson, D., Rethinking project management: researching the actuality of projects. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 24:8 (2006), 675–686.
29. Cilliers, P., What can we learn from a theory of complexity?. Emergence 2:1 (2000), 23–33.
30. Clift, T.B., Vandenbosch, M.B., Project complexity and efforts to reduce product development cycle time. J. Bus. Res. 45:2 (1999), 187–198.
31. Cooke-Davies, T., Cicmil, S., Crawford, L., Richardson, K., Mapping the strange landscape of complexity theory, and its relationship to project management. Proj. Manag. J. 38 (2007), 50–61.
32. Crawford, L., Senior management perceptions of project management competence. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 23:1 (2005), 7–16.
33. De Reyck, B., Herroelen, W., On the use of the complexity index as a measure of complexity in activity networks. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 91:2 (1996), 347–366.
34. DeRosa, J.K., Grisogono, A.M., Ryan, A.J., Norman, D., A Research Agenda for the Engineering of Complex Systems. 2008 2nd Annual IEEE Systems Conference, 2008, 1–8.
35. Doyle, A., Hughes, W., The influence of project complexity on estimating accuracy. 16th Annual ARCOM Conference, 2000, 6–8.
36. Fang, C., Marle, F., Dealing with project complexity by matrix-based propagation modelling for project risk analysis. J. Eng. Des. 24:4 (2013), 239–256.
37. Favari, E., Reducing complexity in urban infrastructure projects. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 53 (2012), 9–15.
38. Frame, J.D., The New Project Management. second ed, 2002, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
39. Geraldi, J.G., The balance between order and chaos in multi-project firms: a conceptual model. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 26:4 (2008), 348–356.
40. Geraldi, J.G., Adlbrecht, G., On faith, fact and interaction in projects. Proj. Manag. J. 38:1 (2007), 32–43.
41. Geraldi, J., Maylor, H., Williams, T., Now, let's make it really complex (complicated): a systematic review of the complexities of projects. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 31:9 (2011), 966–990.
42. Ghapanchi, A.H., Aurum, A., Antecedents to IT personnel's intentions to leave: a systematic literature review. J. Syst. Softw. 84:2 (2011), 238–249.
43. Gidado, K., Project complexity: the focal point of construction production planning. Constr. Manag. Econ. 14:3 (1996), 213–225.
44. Giezen, M., Keeping it simple? A case study into the advantages and disadvantages of reducing complexity in mega project planning. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 30:7 (2012), 781–790.
45. Glouberman, S., Zimmerman, B., Complicated and complex systems: what would successful reform of Medicare look like?. Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada Toronto, 2002.
46. Gorod, A., Gandhi, S.J., Sauser, B., Boardman, J., Flexibility of system of systems. Glob. J. Flex. Syst. Manag. 9:4 (2008), 21–31.
47. Green, G.C., The impact of cognitive complexity on project leadership performance. Inf. Softw. Technol. 46:3 (2004), 165–172.
48. Grisogono, A., The implications of complex adaptive systems theory for C2. DTIC Document, 2006.
49. Hatch, M.J., Cunliffe, A.L., Organization theory: modern, symbolic and postmodern perspectives. 2012, Oxford University Press.
50. Helbing, D., Globally networked risks and how to respond. Nature 497:7447 (2013), 51–59.
51. Higgins, J.P.T., Green, S., Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. 2008, Wiley Online Library.
52. Hobday, M., Product complexity, innovation and industrial organisation. Res. Policy 26:6 (1998), 689–710.
53. Hornby, A.S., Wehmeier, S., Oxford advanced Learner's dictionary. 1995, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
54. Hussein, B.A., An empirical investigation of project complexity from the perspective of a project practitioner. Proceedings of IWAMA, 2012, 335–342.
55. Hussein, B.A., Silva, P.P., Pigagaite, G., Perception of Complexties in Development Projects. Intelligent Data Acquisition and Advanced Computing Systems (IDAACS), 2013 IEEE 7th International Conference on, 2013, IEEE, 537–542.
56. Ireland, V., The role of managerial actions in the cost, time and quality performance of high-rise commercial building projects. Constr. Manag. Econ. 3:1 (1985), 59–87.
57. Ireland, V., Exploration of complex system types. Procedia comput. sc. 20 (2013), 248–255.
58. Ireland, V., Research directions in SoSE. 10th System of Systems Engineering Conference, 2015, San Antonio, TX, USA.
59. Ireland, V., Rapaport, B., Omarova, A., Addressing wicked problems in a range of project types. Procedia Comput. Sci. 12 (2012), 49–55.
60. Ireland, V., Gorod, A., White, B.E., Gandhi, S.J., Sauser, B., A contribution to developing a complex project management BOK. IPMA Proj. Perspect. 35 (2013), 16–25.
61. Ireland, V., White, B.E., Gandhi, S.J., Sauser, B., Gorod, A., Relevant aspects of complex systems from complexity theory. Case Studies in System of Systems, Enterprise Systems, and Complex Systems, 2015, Taylor & Francis Group.
62. Jaafari, A., Management of risks, uncertainties and opportunities on projects: time for a fundamental shift. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 19:2 (2001), 89–101.
63. Jaafari, A., Project management in the age of complexity and change. Proj. Manag. J. 34:4 (2003), 47–58.
64. Jamshidi, M., System of Systems Engineering. Innovations for the 21st Century, 2008, John Wiley & Sons.
65. Keller, R.T., Technology-information processing fit and the performance of R & D project groups: a test of contingency theory. Acad. Manag. J. 37:1 (1994), 167–179.
66. Kennedy, D.M., McComb, S.A., Vozdolska, R.R., An investigation of project complexity's influence on team communication using Monte Carlo simulation. J. Eng. Technol. Manag. 28:3 (2011), 109–127.
67. Kitchenham, B., Pretorius, R., Budgen, D., Brereton, O.P., Turner, M., Systematic literature reviews in software engineering—a tertiary study. Inf. Softw. Technol. 52:8 (2010), 792–805.
68. Koivu, T., Tainio, R., Atkin, B., Ainamo, A., Tukiainen, S., Nummelin, J., Institutional complexity affecting the outcomes of global projects. 2004, JULKAISIJA–UTGIVARE, Finland.
69. Kousha, K., Thelwall, M., Sources of Google scholar citations outside the science citation index: a comparison between four science disciplines. Scientometrics 74:2 (2008), 273–294.
70. Kurtz, C.F., Snowden, D.J., The new dynamics of strategy: sense-making in a complex and complicated world. IBM Syst. J. 42:3 (2003), 462–483.
71. Lessard, D., Sakhrani, V., Miller, R., House of project complexity—understanding complexity in large infrastructure projects. Eng. Proj. Organ. J., 2014, 1–23 (June).
72. Leung Wing Tak, A., Classification of building project complexity and evaluation of supervisory staffing patterns using cluster and factor analysis techniques. 2007, City University of Hong Kong.
73. Levitt, R.E., Thomsen, J., Christiansen, T.R., Kunz, J.C., Jin, Y., Nass, C., Simulating project work processes and organizations: toward a micro-contingency theory of organizational design. Manag. Sci. 45:11 (1999), 1479–1495.
74. Levy, D.L., Application and limitations of complexity theory in organization theory and strategy. Public Adm. Public Policy 79 (2000), 67–88.
75. Little, T., Graphics, L., Context-adaptive agility: managing complexity and uncertainty. IEEE Softw. 22:3 (2005), 28–35.
76. Lu, Y., Luo, L., Wang, H., Le, Y., Shi, Q., Measurement model of project complexity for large-scale projects from task and organization perspective. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 33:3 (2015), 610–622.
77. Maier, M.W., Architecting principles for systems-of-systems. INCOSE International Symposium, 1996, Wiley Online Library, 565–573.
78. Maier, M.W., Architecting principles for system-of-systems. Systems Engineering 1:4 (1998), 267–284.
79. Manson, S.M., Simplifying complexity: a review of complexity theory. Geoforum 32:3 (2001), 405–414.
80. Maylor, H., Vidgen, R., Carver, A., Managerial complexity in project- based operations: a grounded model and its implications for practice. Proj. Manag. J. 39 (2008), 15–26.
81. McDaniel, R.R., Driebe, D.J., Complexity science and health care management. Adv. Health Care Manag. 2 (2001), 11–36.
82. Müller, R., Turner, J.R., Matching the project manager's leadership style to project type. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 25:1 (2007), 21–32.
83. Müller, R., Geraldi, J.G., Turner, J.R., Linking complexity and leadership competences of project managers. Proceedings of IRNOP VIII (International Research Network for Organizing by Projects) Conference, 2007, Universal Publishers, Brighton, UK.
84. Nassar, K.M., Hegab, M.Y., Developing a complexity measure for project schedules. J. Constr. Eng. Manag., 2006, 554–561 (June).
85. Norman, D.O., Kuras, M.L., Engineering complex systems. Complex Engineered Systems, 2006, Springer, 206–245.
86. Parris, D.L., Peachey, J.W., A systematic literature review of servant leadership theory in organizational contexts. J. Bus. Ethics 113:3 (2013), 377–393.
87. Pich, M.T., Loch, C.H., Meyer, A.D., On uncertainty, ambiguity, and complexity in project management. Manag. Sci. 48 (2002), 1008–1023.
88. Pollack, J., The changing paradigms of project management. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 25:3 (2007), 266–274.
89. Project Management Institute (PMI), PMI's Pulse of the Profession In-Depth Report: Navigating Complexity. 2013 (USA).
90. Pryke, S., Towards a social network theory of project governance. 2005 (July 2015).
91. Qing-hua, H., Lan, L., Jian, W., Yong-kui, L., Lei, Z., Using Analytic Network Process to analyze influencing factors of project complexity. International Conference on Management Science & Engineering 19th Annual Conference Proceedings, 2012, IEEE, 1781–1786.
92. Qureshi, S.M., Kang, C., Analysing the organizational factors of project complexity using structural equation modelling. Int. J. Proj. Manag., 2014.
93. Ramasesh, R.V., Browning, T.R., A conceptual framework for tackling knowable unknown unknowns in project management. J. Oper. Manag. 32:4 (2014), 190–204.
94. Rand, G.K., Critical chain: the theory of constraints applied to project management. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 18:3 (2000), 173–177.
95. Remington, K., Pollack, J., Tools for complex projects. 2007, Gower Publishing, Ltd.
96. Remington, K., Zolin, R., Turner, R., A Model of Project Complexity: Distinguishing dimensions of complexity from severity. The 9th International Research Network of Project Management, 2009, QUT, Berlin, 11–13.
97. Ribbers, P.M.A., Schoo, K.C., Program management and complexity of ERP implementations. Eng. Manag. J. 14:2 (2002), 45–52.
98. Rowley, T.J., Moving beyond dyadic ties: a network theory of stakeholder influences. Acad. Manag. Rev. 22:4 (1997), 887–910.
99. Santana, G., Classification of construction projects by scales of complexity. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 8:2 (1990), 102–104.
100. Sauser, B., Boardman, J., Gorod, A., 8System of Systems Management. System of Systems – Innovations for the 21st Century, 2009, 1–24.
101. Saynisch, M., Beyond frontiers of traditional project management: an approach to evolutionary, self-organizational principles and the complexity theory—results of the research program. Proj. Manag. J. 41:2 (2010), 21–37.
102. Saynisch, M., Mastering complexity and changes in projects, economy, and society via project management second order (PM-2). Proj. Manag. J. 41:5 (2010), 4–20.
103. Senescu, R.R., Aranda-mena, G., Haymaker, J.R., Relationships between project complexity and communication. J. Manag. Eng. 29:2 (2013), 183–197.
104. Sheard, S.A., Adviser-Mostashari, A., Assessing the impact of complexity attributes on system development project outcomes. 2012, Stevens Institute of Technology.
105. Shenhar, A.J., One size does not fit all projects: exploring classical contingency domains. Manag. Sci. 47:3 (2001), 394–414.
106. Shenhar, A.J., Contingent management in temporary, dynamic organizations: The comparative analysis of projects. The Journal of High Technology Management Research 12:2 (2001), 239–271.
107. Shenhar, A.J., Dvir, D., Toward a typological theory of project management. Res. Policy 25:4 (1996), 607–632.
108. Shenhar, A.J., Shulman, Y., Dvir, D., A two-dimensional taxonomy of products and innovations. J. Eng. Technol. Manag. 12:3 (1995), 175–200.
109. Shenhar, A.J., Dvir, D., Morris, P.W.G., Pinto, J.K., How projects differ and what to do about it. The Wiley guide to project, program and portfolio management, 2004, 1265–1286.
110. Singh, H., Singh, A., Principles of complexity and chaos theory in project execution: a new approach to management. Cost Eng. 44:12 (2002), 23–33.
111. Sinha, S., Kumar, B., Thomson, A., Measuring project complexity: a project manager's tool. Archit. Eng. Des. Manag. 2 (2006), 187–202.
112. Snowden, D., Complex acts of knowing: paradox and descriptive self-awareness. J. Knowl. Manag. 6:2 (2002), 100–111.
113. Snowden, D.J., Boone, M.E., A leader's framework for decision making. Harv. Bus. Rev., 85(11), 2007, 68.
114. Spink, A., Jansen, B.J., Blakely, C., Koshman, S., A study of results overlap and uniqueness among major web search engines. Inf. Process. Manag. 42:5 (2006), 1379–1391.
115. Tatikonda, M.V., An empirical study of platform and derivative product development projects. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 16:1 (1999), 3–26.
116. Tatikonda, M.V., Rosenthal, S.R., Technology novelty, project complexity, and product development project execution success: a deeper look at task uncertainty in product innovation. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 47:1 (2000), 74–87.
117. Thomas, J., Mengel, T., Preparing project managers to deal with complexity — advanced project management education. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 26:3 (2008), 304–315.
118. Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., Smart, P., Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. Br. J. Manag. 14 (2003), 207–222.
119. Turner, J.R., Cochrane, R.A., Goals-and-methods matrix: coping with projects with ill defined goals and/or methods of achieving them. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 11:2 (1993), 93–102.
120. Vidal, L.A., Marle, F., Understanding project complexity: implications on project management. Kybernetes 37:8 (2008), 1094–1110.
121. Vidal, L.A., Marle, F., Bocquet, J.C., Modelling project complexity. International conference on engineering design, 2007, 1–10.
122. Vidal, L.A., Marle, F., Bocquet, J.C., Measuring project complexity using the analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 29:6 (2011), 718–727.
123. Vidal, L.A., Marle, F., Bocquet, J.C., Using a Delphi process and the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to evaluate the complexity of projects. Expert Syst. Appl. 38:5 (2011), 5388–5405.
124. Whitty, S.J., Maylor, H., And then came complex Project Management (revised). Int. J. Proj. Manag. 27:3 (2009), 304–310.
125. Williams, T., The need for new paradigms for complex projects. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 17:5 (1999), 269–273.
126. Wood, H., Gidado, K., Project complexity in construction. COBRA 2008 (2008), 1–13.
127. Xia, B., Chan, A.P.C., Measuring complexity for building projects: a Delphi study. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 19:1 (2012), 7–24.
128. Xia, W., Lee, G., Grasping the complexity of IS development projects. Commun. ACM 47:5 (2004), 68–74.
129. Yugue, R.T., Maximiano, A.C.A., Contribution to the research of project complexity and management processes. IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation & Technology (ICMIT), 2012, IEEE, 668–673.