Complying with the National Institutes of Health Guidelines and Principles for Rigor and Reproducibility: Refutations

Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology

Volumn 36, Issue 7, 2016, Pages 1303-1304

  Daugherty, Alan ^a   Hegele, Robert A ^b   Mackman, Nigel ^c   Rader, Daniel J ^d   Schmidt, Ann Marie ^e,f   Weber, Christian ^g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^b ROBARTS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^e NEW YORK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^f Institute for Cardiovascular Prevention   (United States)

^g DZHK GERMAN CENTRE FOR CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH   (Germany)

Author keywords

National Institutes of Health; Refutations; Reproducibility; Rigor

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL RESEARCH; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL LITERATURE; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; NONHUMAN; PEER REVIEW; POLICY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SHORT SURVEY; ANIMAL; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PROTOCOL COMPLIANCE; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; STANDARDS; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALS; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; EDITORIAL POLICIES; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (U.S.); PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84976546421     PISSN: 10795642     EISSN: 15244636     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.116.307906     Document Type: Short Survey

References (5)

1. Landis SC, Amara SG, Asadullah K, A call for transparent reporting to optimize the predictive value of preclinical research. Nature 2012 490 187 191. doi: 10.1038/nature11556.
2. Begley CG, Ellis LM, Drug development: raise standards for preclinical cancer research. Nature 2012 483 531 533. doi: 10.1038/483531a.
3. Prinz F, Schlange T, Asadullah K, Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? Nat Rev Drug Discov 2011 10 712. doi: 10.1038/nrd3439-c1.
4. Collins FS, Tabak LA, Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility. Nature 2014 505 612 613
5. Trouble at the lab. Economist 2013 26 30. http://www.economist.com/news/briefing/21588057-scientists-Think-science-self-correcting-Alarming-degree-it-not-Trouble.