Flow measurement around rigid parachute-like bodies in supersonic free stream

14th Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference

Volumn , Issue , 1997, Pages 429-438

  Hiraki, Koju ^a   Hinada, Motoki ^a   Higuchi, Hiroshi ^b  

^a JAPAN AEROSPACE EXPLORATION AGENCY   (Japan)

^b SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AERODYNAMICS; PARACHUTES; PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS; UNSTEADY FLOW; WAVE PROPAGATION; WIND TUNNELS;

OPTICAL OBSERVATIONS; PRESSURE FLUCTUATION; SHOCK OSCILLATIONS; SUPERSONIC PARACHUTE; SUPERSONIC WIND TUNNEL; TWO-POINT CORRELATION; UNSTEADY PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION; UNSTEADY PRESSURES;

FLOW MEASUREMENT;

EID: 84976520028     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.2514/6.1997-1529     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Marko, W.J. “Dynamic Stability of High-Drag Planetary Entry Vehicles at Transonic Speeds,” Journal of Spacecraft, Vol.6, No.12, December 1969, pp.1390-1396.
2. Sammonds, R.I. “Dynamics of High-Drag Probe Shapes at Transonic Speeds,” TN D-6489, 1971, NASA.
3. T. W. Knacke, etc., “Recovery Systems Design Guide,” AFFDL-TR-78-151, Dec. 1978.
4. Nolle, L. J., and Sommer, S.C., “Probing a Planetary Atomosphere: Pioneer Venus Spacecraft Description,” AIAA-Paper75-1160, 1975.
5. Rodier, R.W., Thuss, R.C., and Terhune, I.E. “Parachute Design for the Galileo Jupitor Entry Probe,” AIAA-Paper 81-1951.
6. Corridan, R.E., Givens, J.G. and Kepley, B.M. “Transonic Wind-Tunnel Investigation of the Galileo Probe Parachute Configuration,” AIAA-paper 84- 0823, 1984.
7. Achtermann, E., Kapp, R. and Lehra, H. “Parachute Characteristics of Titan Descent Modules, “ESTEC CONTACT NO. 6364185, Feb. 1986.
8. Lingard, J.S., Barnard, S., and Kearney, P., “Comparative Study of the Performance of Parachutes at Mach 0.5 to Mach 4.35 with Reference to Suitability for Use with the Hermes Crew Escape Capsule,” AIAA-89-0889, Apr. 1989.
9. T. W. Knacke, “Parachute Recovery Systems Design Manual Chapter 5,”, AD-A 183 191, June 1987.
10. “Performance of and Design Criteria for Deployable Aerodynamic Decelerators Chapter 4, “U.S. Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Technical Report No. ASD-TR-61-579, Dec. 1963.
11. Lingrad, J.S. “Supersonic Parachutes,” Short Course on Parachute System Technology, June 1990.
12. Peterson, C.W., “The Aerodynamics of Supersonic Parachute,” Short Course on Parachtue System Technology, June 1987.
13. Foughner, J.T. Jr. and Alexzander, W.C., “Wind-Tunnel Tests of Modefied Cross, Hemisflo and Disk-Gap-Band Parachutes with Emphasiss in the Transonic Range,” NASA TN D-7759, November 1974.
14. Couch, L.W., “Drag and Stability Characterrstics of a Variety of Reefed and Unreefed Parachute Configurations at Mach 1.80 with an Empirical Correction for Supersonic Mach Numbers,” NASA TND-429, Feb. 1975.
15. Whitlock, C.H. and Bendura, R.J. “Inflation and Performance of Three Parachute Configurations from Supersonic Flight Tests in a Low-Density Environment,” NASA TN D-5296, July 1969.
16. Maybue, R.J. and Bobbitt, P.J. “Drag Characteristics of a Disk-Gap-Band Parachute with a Nominal Diameter of 1.65 Meters at Mach Numbers from 2.0 to 3.0,” NASA TND-6894, October 1972.
17. Heinrich, H.G., Et. Al, “Pressure Distribution in Transonic Flow of Ribbon and Guide Surface Parachute Models,” WADC 59-32, Feb. 1959.
18. Hinada, M., Hiraki, K., Inatani, Y., Nakajima, T, Honda, M. and Yamashita, N. “Parachute Deployment Experiment in Transonic and Supersonic Wind Tunnels,” AIAA Paper 91-0859, Apr. 1991.
19. Meyer, R.A. “Wind Tunnel Investigation of Conventional Types of Parachute Canopies in Supersonic Flow,” TR 58-532, Wright Air Development Center, December 1958.
20. Maynard, J.D. “Aerodynamic Characteristics of Parachute at Mach Numbers from 1.6 to 3,” NASA TND-752, 1961.
21. H. G. Heinrich, “Aerodynamics of the Supersonic Guide Surface Parachute,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol.3, No.2, March-April, 1965.
22. Markley, J.T. “Heat Transfer and Pressure Measurement on a 5-inch Hemispherical Concave Nose at a Mach Number of 2.0,” NACA RM L58C14a, July 1958.
23. Stallings, R.L.Jr., and Burbank, P.B. “Heat- Transfer and Pressure Measurements on a Concave- Nose Cylinder for a Mach Number Range of 2.49 to 4.44,” NASA TM X-221, Oct. 1959.
24. Arai, N., Katayama, H and Hiraki, K. ‘TMavier- Stokes Simulation of the Flow around a Cup-Like Body in Supersonic Flow,” Computational Fluid Dyn. ‘96, Vol.1, pp.27-31, 1996.
25. Bastianon, R. “Steady and Unsteady Solution of the Flow Field over Concave Bodies in a Supersonic Free Stream,” AIAA 68-42036, 1968.
26. Bastianon, R.A. “Unsteady Solution of the Flowfield over Concave Bodies,” AIAA Journal Vol.7, No.3, March 1969, pp.531-533.