The world hip trauma evaluation study 3. Hemiarthroplasty evaluation by multicentre investigation - WHiTE 3: HEMI - An abridged protocol

Bone and Joint Research

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 18-25

  Sims, A L ^b   Parsons, N ^a,c   Achten, J ^a,d   Griffin, X L ^a,e,f   Costa, M L ^a,d   Reed, M R ^a,b,g  

^a Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust   (United Kingdom)

^b NORTHUMBRIA HEALTHCARE NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^d JOHN RADCLIFFE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^e OXFORD UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^g NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Exeter; Fracture; Hemiarthroplasty; Hip; Neck of femur; Polished stem; Randomised; Thompsons; Trial

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HEMIARTHROPLASTY; HIP FRACTURE; HUMAN; LEG LENGTH INEQUALITY; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTICENTER STUDY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; QUALITY CONTROL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REOPERATION; SURGICAL MORTALITY; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84976496221     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20463758     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.51.2000473     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Johnell O, Kanis JA. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence, mortality and disability associated with hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 2004;15:897-902.
2. Müller ME, Koch P, Nazarian S, Schatzker J. The Comprehensive Classification of Fractures of Long Bones. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1990.
3. No authors listed. The National Hip Fracture Database National Report 2010 - Extended version http://www.nhfd.co.uk/20/hipfractureR.nsf/0/5223179d21c352d0802577d20041c953/$FILE/NHFD%20National%20Report%20Extended%20e-version.pdf (date last accessed 19 January 2016).
4. Khan RJ, MacDowell A, Crossman P, Keene GS. Cemented or uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular fractures of the hip - a systematic review. Injury 2002;33:13-17.
5. No authors listed. The management of hip fracture in adults. http://www.nice.org.uk (date last accessed 22 December 2015).
6. Kassam AA, Griffiths S, Higgins G. Historical implant or current best standard? Minimum five year follow-up outcomes of cemented Thompson hemiarthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 2014;29:1745-1748.
7. Khan SK, Jameson SS, Sims A, et al. Cemented Thompson's hemiarthroplasty in patients with intracapsular neck of femur fractures: survival analysis of 1,670 procedures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2015;25:655-660
8. Parker MJ. Cemented Thompson hemiarthroplasty versus cemented Exeter Trauma Stem (ETS) hemiarthroplasty for intracapsular hip fractures: a randomised trial of 200 patients. Injury 2012;43:807-810.
9. Leonardsson O, Garellick G, Kärrholm J, Åkesson K, Rogmark C. Changes in implant choice and surgical technique for hemiarthroplasty. 21,346 procedures from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register 2005-2009. Acta Orthop 2012;83:7-13.
10. No authors listed. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Annual Report. https://aoanjrr.dmac.adelaide.edu.au (date last accessed 22 December 2015).
11. Bidwai A, Willett KM. Comparison of the Exeter Trauma Stem and the Thompson hemiarthroplasty for intracapsular hip fractures. Hip Int 2012;22:655-660.
12. Keršič M, Dolinar D, Antolič V, Mavčič B. The impact of leg length discrepancy on clinical outcome of total hip arthroplasty: comparison of four measurement methods. J Arthroplasty 2014;29:137-141.
13. Pakpianpairoj C. Perception of leg length discrepancy after total hip replacement and its impact on quality of life. Journal Med Assoc of Thai 2012;95:S105-108.
14. Boutron I, Moher D, Altman DG, et al. Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 2008;148:295-309.
15. No authors listed. EQ-5D. http://www.euroqol.org (date last accessed 22 December 2015).
16. Griffin XL, Achten J, Parsons N, et al. The Warwick Hip Trauma Evaluation - an abridged protocol for the WHiTE Study: A multiple embedded randomised controlled trial cohort study. Bone Joint Res 2012;1:310-314.
17. Parsons N, Griffin XL, Achten J, Costa ML. Outcome assessment after hip fracture: is EQ-5D the answer? Bone Joint Res 2014;3:69-75.
18. No authors listed. The Mental Capacity Act 2005 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2005/9/contents (date last accessed 19 January 2016).
19. Walters SJ, Brazier JE. Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D. Qual Life Res 2005;14:1523-1532.
20. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Second Edition. Hillsdale: NJ United States: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc, 1988.
21. No authors listed. PS: Power and Sample Size Calculation software. http://biostat.mc.vanderbilt.edu/wiki/Main/PowerSampleSize (date last accessed 19 January 2016).
22. Katz JN, Losina E, Barrett J, et al. Association between hospital and surgeon procedure volume and outcomes of total hip replacement in the United States medicare population. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2001;83-A:1622-1629.
23. No authors listed. NICE Alendronate, etidronate, risedronate, raloxifene, strontium ranelate and teriparatide for the secondary prevention of osteoporotic fragility fractures in post-menopausal women. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ta161 (date last accessed 22 December 20150.
24. No authors listed. The care of patients with fragility fractures"("Blue Book"). http://www.bgs.org.uk/pdf-cms/pubs/Blue%20Book%20on%20fragility%20fracture%20care.pdf (date last accessed 22 December 2015).