E-government's hidden inequality: Why spending on online services can be regressive and how to avoid it

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn 01-03-March-2016, Issue , 2016, Pages 68-74

  Dodel, Matias ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DEL URUGUAY   (Uruguay)

Author keywords

Digital divide; E government; Inequality; Uruguay

Indexed keywords

ECONOMICS; INTERNET; WORLD WIDE WEB;

DIGITAL DIVIDE; DIGITAL STRATIFICATION; E-GOVERNMENTS; GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES; INEQUALITY; REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE; SOCIO-ECONOMIC STATUS; URUGUAY;

GOVERNMENT DATA PROCESSING;

EID: 84976361883     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2910019.2910052     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Castells M. (2005). La Era de la Información. Economía, Sociedad y Cultura: Vol. 1 La Sociedad en Red. Mexico DF: Siglo XXI.
2. de Haan, J. (2010). Late on the curve: Causes and consequences of differences in digital skills. Handbook of Research on Overcoming Digital Divides: Constructing an Equitable and Competitive Information Society, 1, 292-308.
3. Dieguez, M.; Dodel, M. & Texeira, N. (2014) Principales resultados EUTIC 2013. AGESIC:INE.
4. Di Matteo, C. & Dodel, M. (2011) Principales resultados EUTIC 2010. AGESIC:INE.
5. Dodel, M. (2015). An analytical framework to incorporate ICT as an independent variable. In Impact of Information Society Research in the Global South (pp. 125-144). Springer Singapore.
6. Dodel, M. (2015b) URUGUAY, SOCIEDAD E INTERNET: Principales Resultados de la Encuesta WIP+UY 2013. Universidad Católica del Uruguay.
7. Gujarati, D.N. (2004) Basic Econometrics, Fourth Edition. McGraw-Hill New York.
8. Hargittai, E. (2008). The digital reproduction on inequality. In Grusky, D. (ed.), Social Stratification: Class, Race, and Gender in Sociological Perspective (936-944). Boulder: Westview Press.
9. Helsper, E.J., van Deursen, A.J.A.M. & Eynon, R. (2015). Tangible Outcomes of Internet Use. From Digital Skills to Tangible Outcomes project report.
10. Hernandez, D., & Rossel, C. (2015). Inequality and access to social services in Latin America: space-time constraints of child health checkups and prenatal care in Montevideo. Journal of Transport Geography, 44, 24-32.
11. Merton, R. K. (1988). The Matthew effect in science, II: Cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property. Isis, 606-623.
12. Robinson, L., Cotten, S. R., Ono, H., Quan-Haase, A., Mesch, G., Chen, W, Schultz, J., Hale, T.M. & Stern, M. J. (2015). Digital inequalities and why they matter. Information, Communication & Society, 18(5), 569-582.
13. Selwyn N. (2004). Reconsidering political and popular understandings of the digital divide. New Media & Society, 6(3), 341-362.
14. Spicer, J. (2004). Making sense of multivariate data analysis: An intuitive approach. Sage Publications, Incorporated.
15. van Dijk, J. A. (2005). The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society. Sage.
16. Witte, J. C., & Mannon, S. E. (2010). The internet and social inequalities. New York: Routledge