Multivariate full Bayesian hot spot identification and ranking new technique

Transportation Research Record

Volumn 2515, Issue , 2015, Pages 1-9

  Sacchi, Emanuele ^a   Sayed, Tarek ^a   El Basyouny, Karim ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MOTOR TRANSPORTATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

BAYESIAN; BAYESIAN METHODS; HOT SPOT IDENTIFICATION; HOTSPOTS; MAHALANOBIS DISTANCES; MULTIPLE RESPONSE; POISSON LOGNORMAL REGRESSIONS; RANKING TECHNIQUE; SAFETY IMPROVEMENT; UNIVARIATE;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS;

EID: 84976312654     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: 21694052     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2515-01     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Higle, J. L., and M. B. Hecht. A Comparison of Techniques for the Identification of Hazardous Locations. In Transportation Research Record 1238, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1989, pp. 10-19.
2. Sayed, T., and F. Rodriguez. Accident Prediction Models for Urban Unsignalized Intersections in British Columbia. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1665, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 93-99.
3. Persaud, B., C. Lyon, and T. Nguyen. Empirical Bayes Procedure for Ranking Sites for Safety Investigation by Potential for Safety Improvement. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1665, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 7-12.
4. Cheng, W., and S. P. Washington. Experimental Evaluation of Hotspot Identification Methods. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 37, 2005, pp. 870-881.
5. Cheng, W., and S. P. Washington. New Criteria for Evaluating Methods of Identifying Hot Spots. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2083, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 76-85.
6. Huang, H., H. C. Chin, and M. M. Haque. Empirical Evaluation of Alternative Approaches in Identifying Crash Hot Spots: Naive Ranking, Empirical Bayes, and Full Bayes Methods. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2103, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 32-41.
7. Elvik, R. Comparative Analysis of Techniques for Identifying Locations of Hazardous Roads. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2083, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 72-75.
8. National Research Council (U.S.), TRB, Task Force on Development of the Highway Safety Manual, and Transportation Officials. Joint Task Force on the Highway Safety Manual. Highway Safety Manual, Vol. 2, AASHTO, 2010.
9. Lan, B., and B. Persaud. Fully Bayesian Approach to Investigate and Evaluate Ranking Criteria for Black Spot Identification. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2237, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011, pp. 117-125.
10. Hauer, E. Observational Before-After Studies in Road Safety. Pergamon Press, Elsevier Science Ltd., Oxford, United Kingdom, 1997.
11. Lan, B., B. Persaud, C. Lyon, and R. Bhim. Validation of a Full Bayes Methodology for Observational Before-After Road Safety Studies and Application to Evaluation of Rural Signal Conversions. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 41, No. 3, 2009, pp. 574-580.
12. Li, Wen, A. Carriquiry, M. Pawlovich, and T. Welch. The Choice of Statistical Models in Road Safety Countermeasure Effectiveness Studies in Iowa. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 40, No. 4, 2008, pp. 1531-1542.
13. El-Basyouny, K., and T. Sayed. Full Bayes Approach to Beforeand-After Safety Evaluation with Matched Comparisons: Case Study of Stop-Sign In-Fill Program. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2148, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 1-8.
14. El-Basyouny, K., and T. Sayed. A Full Bayes Multivariate Intervention Model with Random Parameters Among Matched Pairs for Before-After Safety Evaluation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 43, 2011, pp. 87-94.
15. Tunaru, R. Hierarchical Bayesian Models for Multiple Count Data. Austrian Journal of Statistics, Vol. 31, No. 3, 2002, pp. 221-229.
16. Ma, J., and K. M. Kockelman. Bayesian Multivariate Poisson Regression for Models of Injury Count, by Severity. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1950, Trans portation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 24-34.
17. Brijs, T., D. Karlis, F. Van den Bossche, and G. Wets. A Bayesian Model for Ranking Hazardous Road Sites. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), Vol. 170, No. 4, 2007, pp. 1001-1017.
18. Park, E. S., and D. Lord. Multivariate Poisson-Lognormal Models for Jointly Modeling Crash Frequency by Severity. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2019, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 1-6.
19. Aguero-Valverde, J., and P. P. Jovanis. Bayesian Multivariate Poisson Lognormal Models for Crash Severity Modeling and Site Ranking. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2136, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 82-91.
20. El-Basyouny, K. and T. Sayed. Collision Prediction Models Using Multivariate Poisson-Lognormal Regression. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 41, No. 4, 2009, pp. 820-828.
21. El-Basyouny, K., and T. Sayed. Depth-Based Hotspot Identification and Multivariate Ranking Using the Full Bayes Approach. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 50, 2013, pp. 1082-1089.
22. Spiegelhalter, D., A. Thomas, N. Best, and D. Lunn. WinBUGS User Manual. MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge, United Kingdom. 2005. http://www.mrc-cam.ac.uk/bugs.
23. Lange, K. L., R. J. A. Little, and J. M. G. Taylor. Robust Statistical Modeling Using the T Distribution. Journal of the American Statistical Society, Vol. 84, 1989, pp. 881-896.
24. De Maesschalck, R., D. Jouan-Rimbaud, and D. L. Massart. The Mahalanobis Distance. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, Vol. 50, No. 1, 2000, pp. 1-18.
25. El-Basyouny, K., and T. Sayed. A Method to Account for Outliers in the Development of Safety Performance Functions. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 42, No. 4, 2010, pp. 1266-1272.
26. Bedrick, E. J., R. Christensen, and W. Johnson. A New Perspective on Priors for Generalized Linear Models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 91, 1996, pp. 1450-1460.
27. Schluter, P. J., J. J. Deely, and A. J. Nicholson. Ranking and Selecting Motor Vehicle Accident Sites by Using a Hierarchical Bayesian Model. The Statistician, Vol. 46, No. 3, 1997, pp. 293-316.
28. Spiegelhalter, D. J., A. Thomas, and N. G. Best. Computation on Bayesian Graphical Models. In Bayesian Statistics, Vol. 5 (J. M. Bernardo, J. O. Berger, A. P. Dawid, and A. F. M. Smith, eds.), Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom, 1996, pp. 407-425.
29. Chib, S., and R. Winkelmann. Markov Chain Monte Carlo Analysis of Correlated Count Data. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, Vol. 19, 2001, pp. 428-435.
30. Congdon, P. Bayesian Statistical Modeling, 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 2006.