Spatial variability of sugarcane row gaps: Measurement and mapping;Variabilidade espacial de falhas em cana-de-açúcar: Mensuração e mapeamento

Ciencia e Agrotecnologia

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 347-355

  Molin, José Paulo ^a   Veiga, João Paulo Soto ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Biofuel; Close range remote sensing; Field quality; Interpolation; Photoelectric sensor

Indexed keywords

EID: 84976312652     PISSN: 14137054     EISSN: 19811829     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/1413-70542016403046915     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. EMPRESA DE PESQUISA ENERGÉTICA-EPE. National energy balance 2015: Year base 2014. Rio de Janeiro: EPE. 2015. Available in: . Access in: August, 12, 2015.
2. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION-FAO. Faostat, 2013. Available in: . Access in: March 4, 2014.
3. FRASSON, F. R. et al. Use of active optical sensor to detect gaps on sugarcane planting. STAB, 26: 34-37, 2007.
4. JOHANSEN, K., et al. Mapping whitegrub damage in sugarcane from high spatial resolution satellite imagery. South-Eastern European Journal of Earth Observation and Geomatics, 3 (2): 549-553, 2014.
5. KEERTHIPALA, A. P.; DHARMAWARDENE, N. Determination of optimal replanting cycles for sugarcane production in Sri Lanka. Sugar Cane Tech, 2 (3): 9-19, 2000.
6. MA, S. et al. Sugarcane harvester technology: a critical overview. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 30 (5): 727-739, 2014.
7. MANHÃES, C. M. C. et al. Quantitative damages to ratoon in the sugarcane harvest in North Fluminense. Vértices, 15 (3): 61-71, 2013.
8. NAKARMI, A. D.; TANG, L. Automatic inter-plant spacing sensing at early growth stages using a 3D vision sensor. Computers and electronics in agriculture, 82: 23-31, 2012.
9. NORONHA, R. H. F, et al. Statistical control applied to the diurnal and nocturnal mechanized harvesting process in sugarcane. Bragantia, 70 (4): 931-938, 2011.
10. OTTO, R. et al. High soil penetration resistance reduces sugarcane root system development. Soil and Tillage Research, 117: 201-210, 2011.
11. PACCA, S.; MOREIRA, J. R. Historical carbon budget of the Brazilian ethanol program. Energy Policy, 37 (11), p. 4863-4873, 2009.
12. PAULA, V. R.; MOLIN, J. P. Assessing damage caused by accidental vehicle traffic on sugarcane ratoon. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 29 (2): 161-169, 2013.
13. QGIS Development Team. QGIS Geographic Information System. 2015, Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project. Available in: . Access in: 2015.
14. RUDORFF, B. F. T. et al. Studies on the rapid expansion of sugarcane for ethanol production in São Paulo State (Brazil) using Landsat data. Remote sensing, 2 (4): 1057-1076, 2010.
15. SANTOS, M. A. et al. Rating failures the sprouting of sugarcane as a function of water availability. Agropecuária Científica no Semiárido, 9 (4): 30-35. 2013
16. SERAFIM, L. G. F. et al. Influence of mechanical planting in the budding index of sugarcane. STAB, 31 (1): 22-25, 2013.
17. SHI, Y. et al. Improvement of a ground-LiDAR-based corn plant population and spacing measurement system. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 112: 92-101, 2015.
18. SOUZA, G. D. et al. Soil compressibility and root system of sugarcane with and without controlled-traffic farming. Pesquisa agropecuária brasileira, 47 (4): 603-612, 2012.
19. STOLF, R. Methodology for gap evaluation on sugarcane lines. STAB, 4 (6): 12-20, 1986.
20. TOLON-BECERRA, A. et al. Effects of different tillage regimes on soil compaction, maize (Zea mays L.) seedling emergence and yields in the eastern Argentinean Pampas region. Soil and Tillage Research. 117: 184-190, 2011.
21. WANG, L., et al. Economic and GHG emissions analyses for sugarcane ethanol in Brazil: Looking forward. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 40: 571-582, 2014.