No difference in long-term development of rotator cuff rupture and muscle volumes in impingement patients with or without decompression: A randomized MRI study of 140 patients

Acta Orthopaedica

Volumn 87, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 351-355

  Ketola, Saara ^a   Lehtinen, Janne ^b   Elo, Petra ^a   Kortelainen, Seppo ^c   Huhtala, Heini ^d   Arnala, Ilkka ^c  

^a Coxa Hospital for Joint Replacement ^*  (Finland)

^b Hatanpaa Hospital   (Finland)

^c KANTA HÄME CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^d TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACROMION; ADULT; ARTHROSCOPIC ACROMIOPLASTY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECOMPRESSION; DEGENERATION; EXERCISE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GENERAL CONDITION DETERIORATION; HUMAN; LONG TERM SURVIVAL; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MUSCLE MASS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; PAIN ASSESSMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; ROTATOR CUFF RUPTURE; SHOULDER IMPINGEMENT SYNDROME; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; ARTHROSCOPY; COMPLICATION; DECOMPRESSION SURGERY; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROTATOR CUFF INJURIES; RUPTURE; TIME FACTOR; YOUNG ADULT;

ACROMION; ADULT; ARTHROSCOPY; DECOMPRESSION, SURGICAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROTATOR CUFF INJURIES; RUPTURE; SHOULDER IMPINGEMENT SYNDROME; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84976299345     PISSN: 17453674     EISSN: 17453682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17453674.2016.1177780     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. L.U.Bigliani, W.N.Levine Subacromial impingement syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997; 79(12): 1854–68.
2. H.Bjornsson, R.Norlin, A.Knutsson, L.Adolfsson Fewer rotator cuff tears fifteen years after arthroscopic subacromial decompression. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2010; 19(1): 111–5.
3. A.S.Bright, B.Torpey, D.Magid, T.Codd, E.G.McFarland Reliability of radiographic evaluation for acromial morphology. Skeletal Radiol 1997; 26(12): 718–21.
4. J.I.Brox, E.Gjengedal, G.Uppheim, A.S.Bohmer, J.I.Brevik, A.E.Ljunggren,. Arthroscopic surgery versus supervised exercises in patients with rotator cuff disease (stage II impingement syndrome): a prospective, randomized, controlled study in 125 patients with a 2 1/2-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1999; 8(2): 102–11.
5. B.Fuchs, D.Weishaupt, M.Zanetti, J.Hodler, C.Gerber Fatty degeneration of the muscles of the rotator cuff: assessment by computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1999; 8(6): 599–605.
6. T.J.Gill, E.McIrvin, M.S.Kocher, K.Homa, S.D.Mair, R.J.Hawkins The relative importance of acromial morphology and age with respect to rotator cuff pathology. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2002; 11(4): 327–30.
7. D.Goutallier, J.M.Postel, J.Bernageau, L.Lavau, M.C.Voisin Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures. Pre- and postoperative evaluation by CT scan. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994; (304): 78–83.
8. J.P.Haahr, J.H.Andersen Exercises may be as efficient as subacromial decompression in patients with subacromial stage II impingement: 4-8-years’ follow-up in a prospective, randomized study. Scand J Rheumatol 2006; 35(3): 224–8.
9. K.R.Holzbaur, W.M.Murray, G.E.Gold, S.L.Delp Upper limb muscle volumes in adult subjects. J Biomech 2007; 40(4): 742–9.
10. P.Hyvönen, S.Lohi, P.Jalovaara Open acromioplasty does not prevent the progression of an impingement syndrome to a tear. Nine-year follow-up of 96 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998; 80(5): 813–6.
11. B.Juul-Kristensen, F.Bojsen-Moller, L.Finsen, J.Eriksson, G.Johansson, F.Stahlberg,. Muscle sizes and moment arms of rotator cuff muscles determined by magnetic resonance imaging. Cells Tissues Organs 2000; 167(2-3): 214–22.
12. S.Ketola, J.Lehtinen, I.Arnala, M.Nissinen, H.Westenius, H.Sintonen,. Does arthroscopic acromioplasty provide any additional value in the treatment of shoulder impingement syndrome?: a two-year randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009; 91(10): 1326–34.
13. S.Ketola, J.Lehtinen, T.Rousi, M.Nissinen, H.Huhtala, Y.T.Konttinen,. No evidence of long-term benefits of arthroscopicacromioplasty in the treatment of shoulder impingement syndrome: Five-year results of a randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint Res 2013; 2(7): 132–9.
14. S.Ketola, J.Lehtinen, T.Rousi, M.Nissinen, H.Huhtala, I.Arnala Which patients do not recover from shoulder impingement syndrome, either with operative treatment or with nonoperative treatment? Acta Orthop 2015; 86(6): 641–6
15. J.T.Lehtinen, M.J.Tingart, M.Apreleva, D.Zurakowski, W.Palmer, J.J.Warner Practical assessment of rotator cuff muscle volumes using shoulder MRI. Acta Orthop Scand 2003; 74(6): 722–9.
16. M.E.Mayerhoefer, M.J.Breitenseher, A.Roposch, C.Treitl, C.Wurnig Comparison of MRI and conventional radiography for assessment of acromial shape. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 184(2): 671–5.
17. B.K.Moor, K.Wieser, K.Slankamenac, C.Gerber, S.Bouaicha Relationship of individual scapular anatomy and degenerative rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2014; 23(4): 536–41.
18. D.S.Morrison, L.U.Bigliani, E.W.April The morphology of the acromion and its relationship to rotator cuff tears. Orthop Trans 1987; 11: 439.
19. C.S.Neer, 2nd. Anterior acromioplasty for the chronic impingement syndrome in the shoulder: a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1972; 54(1): 41–50.
20. C.S.Neer, 2nd. Impingement lesions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1983; (173): 70–7.
21. G.P.Nicholson, D.A.Goodman, E.L.Flatow, L.U.Bigliani The acromion: morphologic condition and age-related changes. A study of 420 scapulas. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1996; 5(1): 1–11.
22. L.Nove-Josserand, G.Walch, P.Adeleine, P.Courpron Effect of age on the natural history of the shoulder: a clinical and radiological study in the elderly. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2005; 91(6): 508–14.
23. J.Ozaki, S.Fujimoto, Y.Nakagawa, K.Masuhara, S.Tamai Tears of the rotator cuff of the shoulder associated with pathological changes in the acromion. A study in cadavera. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988; 70(8): 1224–30.
24. N.Saupe, C.W.Pfirrmann, M.R.Schmid, B.Jost, C.M.Werner, M.Zanetti Association between rotator cuff abnormalities and reduced acromiohumeral distance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187(2): 376–382.
25. N.N.Shah, N.C.Bayliss, A.Malcolm Shape of the acromion: congenital or acquired–a macroscopic, radiographic, and microscopic study of acromion. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2001; 10(4): 309–316.
26. M.E.Vidt, M.Daly, M.E.Miller, C.C.Davis, A.P.Marsh, K.R.Saul Characterizing upper limb muscle volume and strength in older adults: a comparison with young adults. J Biomech 2012; 45(2): 334–41.
27. M.A.Vitale, R.R.Arons, S.Hurwitz, C.S.Ahmad, W.N.Levine The rising incidence of acromioplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92(9): 1842–50.
28. J.C.Wang, M.S.Shapiro Changes in acromial morphology with age. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1997; 6(1): 55–9.
29. K.Yamaguchi, A.M.Tetro, O.Blam, B.A.Evanoff, S.A.Teefey, W.D.Middleton Natural history of asymptomatic rotator cuff tears: a longitudinal analysis of asymptomatic tears detected sonographically. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2001; 10(3): 199–203.
30. N.Yamamoto, T.Muraki, J.W.Sperling, S.P.Steinmann, E.Itoi, R.H.Cofield,. Contact between the coracoacromial arch and the rotator cuff tendons in nonpathologic situations: A cadaveric study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2010; 19(5): 681–7
31. E.Yu, A.Cil, W.S.Harmsen, C.Schleck, J.W.Sperling, R.H.Cofield Arthroscopy and the dramatic increase in frequency of anterior acromioplasty from 1980 to 2005: an epidemiologic study. Arthroscopy 2010; 26(9 Suppl): S142–S7.
32. M.Zanetti, C.Gerber, J.Hodler Quantitative assessment of the muscles of the rotator cuff with magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 1998; 33(3): 163–70.