Annotating the behavior of scientific modules using data examples: A practical approach

Advances in Database Technology - EDBT 2014: 17th International Conference on Extending Database Technology, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 726-737

  Belhajjame, Khalid ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DAUPHINE   (France)

Author keywords

Data example; Module annotation; Module comparison; Scientific module; Scientific workflow; Workflow decay

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; DATABASE SYSTEMS; SEMANTICS;

DATA EXAMPLES; MODULE ANNOTATION; MODULE COMPARISON; SCIENTIFIC MODULE; SCIENTIFIC WORKFLOWS; WORKFLOW DECAY;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

EID: 84976276280     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.5441/002/edbt.2014.79     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (42)

1. B. Alexe, B. ten Cate, P. G. Kolaitis, and W. C. Tan. Characterizing schema mappings via data examples. ACM Trans. Database Syst., 36(4):23, 2011.
2. K. Belhajjame, S. M. Embury, et al. Proteome data integration: Characteristics and challenges. In UK All Hands Meeting, 2005.
3. K. Belhajjame, S. M. Embury, and N. W. Paton. Verification of semantic web services using ontology-based equivalence partitioning. IEEE Transactions on Service Computing, 2013.
4. K. Belhajjame, C. A. Goble, S. Soiland-Reyes, et al. Fostering scientific workflow preservation through discovery of substitute services. In eScience, pages 97-104, 2011.
5. K. Belhajjame, J. Zhao, D. Garijo, et al. A workflow prov-corpus based on taverna and wings. In EDBT/ICDT Workshops, pages 331-332, 2013.
6. C. Binnig, D. Kossmann, and E. Lo. Reverse query processing. In ICDE. IEEE, 2007.
7. J. Cardoso and A. P. Sheth, editors. Semantic Web Services, Processes and Applications, volume 3 of Semantic Web And Beyond Computing for Human Experience. Springer, 2006.
8. F. Curbera, F. Leymann, et al. Web services platform architecture: SOAP, WSDL, WS-policy, WS-addressing, WS-BPEL, WS-reliable messaging and more. Prentice Hall PTR Englewood Cliffs, 2005.
9. E. Deelman, D. Gannon, M. S. Shields, and I. Taylor. Workflows and e-science: An overview of workflow system features and capabilities. Future Generation Comp. Syst., 25(5):528-540, 2009.
10. A. K. Elmagarmid, P. G. Ipeirotis, and V. S. Verykios. Duplicate record detection: A survey. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 19(1):1-16, 2007.
11. R. Fagin, P. G. Kolaitis, et al. Data exchange: semantics and query answering. Theor. Comput. Sci., 336(1):89-124, 2005.
12. J. Freire and C. T. Silva. Making computations and publications reproducible with vistrails. Computing in Science and Engineering, 14(4):18-25, 2012.
13. D. Garijo, P. Alper, et al. Common motifs in scientific workflows: An empirical analysis. In eScience, pages 1-8, 2012.
14. Y. Gil et al. Wings: Intelligent workflow-based design of computational experiments. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 26(1):62-72, 2011.
15. C. Goble et al. Biocatalogue: A curated web service registry for the life science community. In Microsoft eScience conference, 2008.
16. C. Goble and D. D. Roure. Curating scientific web services and workflow. EDUCAUSE Review, 43(5), 2008.
17. C. A. Goble, R. Stevens, D. Hull, K. Wolstencroft, and R. Lopez. Data curation + process curation=data integration + science. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 9(6):506-517, 2008.
18. J. Goecks, A. Nekrutenko, J. Taylor, et al. Galaxy: a comprehensive approach for supporting accessible, reproducible, and transparent computational research in the life sciences. Genome Biol, 11(8):R86, 2010.
19. K. Gomadam, A. Ranabahu, M. Nagarajan, A. P. Sheth, and K. Verma. A faceted classification based approach to search and rank web apis. In ICWS, pages 177-184, 2008.
20. K. Gomadam, K. Verma, D. Brewer, A. P. Sheth, and J. A. Miller. Radiant: A tool for semantic annotation of web services. In 4th International Semantic Web Conference ISWC, 2005.
21. T. Gruber. Ontology. In Encyclopedia of Database Systems, pages 1963-1965. Springer US, 2009.
22. D. Hull, E. Zolin, A. Bovykin, I. Horrocks, U. Sattler, and R. Stevens. Deciding semantic matching of stateless services. In AAAI, 2006.
23. K. Johari and A. Kaur. Interoperability issues in web services. In CCSEIT, pages 614-619, 2012.
24. D. John and M. S. Rajasree. A framework for the description, discovery and composition of restful semantic web services. In CCSEIT, pages 88-93, 2012.
25. S. Koide and H. Takeda. Owl-full reasoning from an object oriented perspective. In ASWC. Springer, 2006.
26. J. Kopecký, D. Roman, M. Moran, and D. Fensel. Semantic web services grounding. In AICT/ICIW. IEEE Computer Society, 2006.
27. B. Korel. Automated software test data generation. IEEE Trans. Software Eng., 16(8):870-879, 1990.
28. Dominik Kuropka, Peter Tröger, Steffen Staab, and Mathias Weske, editors. Semantic Service Provisioning. Springer, Berlin, 2008.
29. R. Lopez. Personal communication. European Bioinformatics Institute, Cambridge, UK, February 2012.
30. P. Missier et al. Functional units: Abstractions for web service annotations. In SERVICES, pages 306-313, 2010.
31. N. Oldham, C. Thomas, A. P. Sheth, and K. Verma. Meteor-s web service annotation framework with machine learning classification. In SWSWPC, pages 137-146, 2004.
32. C. Olston, S. Chopra, and U. Srivastava. Generating example data for dataflow programs. In SIGMOD Conference, pages 245-256. ACM, 2009.
33. M. Paolucci, T. Kawamura, et al. Semantic matching of web services capabilities. In International Semantic Web Conference, pages 333-347, 2002.
34. R. Patton. Software Testing (2nd Edition). Sams, Indianapolis, IN, USA, 2005.
35. U. Radetzki et al. Adapters, shims, and glue - service interoperability for in silico experiments. Bioinformatics, 22(9):1137-1143, 2006.
36. E. Rahm and P. A. Bernstein. A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching. VLDB J., 10(4):334-350, 2001.
37. Leonard Richardson and Sam Ruby. RESTful web services. O'Reilly, 2008.
38. R. Studer, S. Grimm, and A. Abecker, editors. Semantic Web Services, Concepts, Technologies, and Applications. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007.
39. W. Chiew Tan. Personal communication. University of California, Santa Cruz, USA, March 2013.
40. K. Wolstencroft et al. The taverna workflow suite: designing and executing workflows of web services on the desktop, web or in the cloud. Nucleic acids research, 2013.
41. L. L. Yan, R. J. Miller, L. M. Haas, and R. Fagin. Data-driven understanding and refinement of schema mappings. In SIGMOD Conference, pages 485-496, 2001.
42. J. Zhao et al. Why workflows break - understanding and combating decay in taverna workflows. In eScience, pages 1-9, 2012.