A mysterious power: Industrial accidents and the legal construction of employment relations in massachusetts, 1800–1850

law and history review

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 1988, Pages 375-438

  Tomlins, Christopher L ^a  

^a LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84976175756     PISSN: 07382480     EISSN: 19399022     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/743687     Document Type: Article

References (142)

1. Comment, “The Creation of a Common Law Rule: The Fellow-Servant Rule, 1837–1860,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1 32 (1984): 579–620.
2. Farwell v. Boston & Worcester Railroad Corp., Suffolk County Court of Common Pleas, October term 1839 (New Entry 150), JARP.
3. Leonard W. Levy, The Law of the Commonwealth and Chief Justice Shaw (Cambridge, 1957), 166.
4. Lawrence M. Friedman and Jack Ladinsky, “Social Change and the Law of Industrial Accidents,” Columbia Law Review 67 (1967): 50–82.
5. Morton J. Horwitz, The Transformation of American Law, 1780–1860 (Cambridge, 1977), 208–10.
6. Robert L. Rabin, “The Historical Development of the Fault Principle: A Reinterpretation,” Georgia Law Review 15 (1981): 925–61.
7. Gary T. Schwartz, “Tort Law and the Economy in Nineteenth Century America: A Reinterpretation,” Yale Law Journal 90 (1981): 1717–75.
8. M. J. Pritchard, Scott v. Shepherd (1773) and the Emergence of the Tort of Negligence (London, 1976).
9. Comment, “Creation of a Common Law Rule,” 594–620.
10. Lawrence M. Friedman, A History of American Law (New York, 1973), 422.
11. Robert W. Gordon, “Critical Legal Histories,” Stanford Law Review 36 (1984): 1122. (Emphasis in original).
12. Thomas Carlyle, “Signs of the Times,” in Carlyle: Selected Works, Reminiscences and Letters, ed. Julian Symons (Cambridge, 1963), 22.
13. Leo Marx, The Machine in the Garden: Technology and the Pastoral Ideal in America (New York, 1964), 170–80.
14. Carlyle, “Signs of the Times,” 22–23, 25.
15. George S. White, A Memoir of Samuel Slater (Philadelphia, 1836), 53–57.
16. James Willard Hurst, Law and the Conditions of Freedom in the Nineteenth Century United States (Madison, 1956), 3–32.
17. Marx, Machine in the Garden, 181.
18. Joyce Appleby, Capitalism and a New Social Order: The Republican Vision of the 1790s (New York, 1984), 49–50.
19. Drew McCoy, The Elusive Republic: Political Economy in Jeffersonian America (Chapel Hill, 1980), 15, 62–67.
20. John Kasson, Civilizing the Machine: Technology and Republican Values in America, 1776–1900 (New York, 1976), 3–51, especially 13.
21. Marx, Machine in the Garden, 145–50.
22. McCoy, Elusive Republic, 111, 104–19.
23. McCoy, Elusive Republic, 148–65, 223–24.
24. Appleby, Capitalism and a New Social Order, 79–105.
25. Rowland Berthoff, An Unsettled People: Social Order and Disorder in American History (New York, 1971).
26. Kasson, Civilizing the Machine, 31–32.
27. David J. Rothman, The Discovery of the Asylum: Social Order and Disorder in the New Republic (Boston, 1971).
28. “as a machine for the social production of guilt.” A Just Measure of Pain: The Penitentiary in the Industrial Revolution, 1750–1850 (London, 1978), 213.
29. Rothman, Discovery of the Asylum, 108.
30. Ignatieff, Just Measure of Pain, 67.
31. Sidney Pollard, The Genesis of Modern Management: A Study of the Industrial Revolution in Great Britain (London, 1965).
32. Alfred D. Chandler's The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business (Cambridge, 1977).
33. Ignatieff, Just Measure of Pain, 62.
34. Kasson, Civilizing the Machine, 64.
35. Anthony F. C. Wallace, Rockdale: The Growth of An American Village in the Early Industrial Revolution (New York, 1978), 263.
36. Fraser, “The Corporation as Body Politic,” unpublished paper, 29–59.
37. Kasson, Civilizing the Machine, 69–86.
38. Jonathan Prude, The Coming of Industrial Order: Town and Factory Life in Rural Massachusetts (New York, 1983), 111–16.
39. White, Memoir of Samuel Slater, 113–20.
40. Tribe, Genealogies of Capitalism (London, 1981), 111.
41. Walter Licht, Working for the Railroad: The Organization of Work in the Nineteenth Century (Princeton, 1983), 79.
42. E. P. Thompson, “Time, Work-Discipline and Industrial Capitalism,” Past and Present 38 (1967): 56–97.
43. Wallace, Rockdale, 181.
44. Kasson, Civilizing the Machine, 78.
45. Thomas Dublin, Women at Work: The Transformation of Work and Community in Lowell, Massachusetts, 1826–1860 (New York, 1979), 70–71.
46. Carl Siracusa, A Mechanical People: Perceptions of the Industrial Order in Massachusetts, 1815–60 (Middletown, Conn., 1979), 115.
47. Dublin, Women at Work, 60, 73.
48. Barbara M. Tucker, Samuel Slater and the Origins of the American Textile Industry, 1790–1860 (Ithaca, 1984), 147–62.
49. Prude, Coming of Industrial Order, 130.
50. Richard C. Edwards, Contested Terrain: The Transformation of the Workplace in the Twentieth Century (New York, 1979), 23–27.
51. Tribe, Genealogies of Capitalism, 115.
52. Genesis of Modern Management, 55–59.
53. Raphael Samuel, “The Workshop of the World: Steam Power and Hand Technology in Mid-Victorian Britain,” History Workshop 3 (1977): 6–72.
54. Mark Cousins and Athar Hussain, Michel Foucault (London, 1984), 188.
55. Discovery of the Asylum, 237–64.
56. Ignatieff, Just Measure of Pain, 207–15.
57. Alf Ludtke, “The Historiography of Everyday Life: The Personal and the Political,” in Culture, Ideology and Politics: Essays for Eric Hobsbawm, ed. Raphael Samuel and Gareth Stedman Jones (London, 1982), 48.
58. Siracusa, Mechanical People, 157.
59. Women at Work, 65. In Rockdale, 149–50.
60. in St. Clair: A Nineteenth Century Coal Town's Experience with a Disaster-Prone Industry (New York, 1987), particularly 249–75.
61. Simeon Farmer, who “had his leg broke in two places by the return of an iron crow bar in turning over a stone” in June 1797.
62. Richard Briggs “who had his leg broke blowing stones” in September 1800.
63. Edward J. O'Day, “Constructing the Western Railroad: The Irish Dimension,” Historical Journal of Massachusetts 11, no. 1 (January 1893): 20–21.
64. Charles F. Sabel, Work and Politics: The Division of Labor in Industry (New York, 1982), 199.
65. W.G. Carson, The Other Price of Britain's Oil: Safety and Control in the North Sea (Oxford, 1982).
66. Carson, Other Price of Britain's Oil, 84–138.
67. Dublin, Women at Work, 108–12, 132–38. (Emphasis supplied.).
68. Tucker, Samuel Slater, 214–49.
69. Siracusa, Mechanical People, 160–61.
70. Stephen Salsbury, The State, The Investor and the Railroad: The Boston and Albany, 1825–67 (Cambridge, 1967), 64–65.
71. Salsbury, The State, the Investor and the Railroad, 114–15.
72. Boston and Worcester Railroad, Directors’ Minutes, Vol. 1–7.
73. Siracusa, Mechanical People, 155–62.
74. David M. Gordon, Segmented Work, Divided Workers: The Historical Transformation of Labor in the United States (New York, 1982), 54–78.
75. Wallace, Rockdale, 326–37.
76. Tucker, Samuel Slater, 223–29.
77. Working for the Railroad, 80–89.
78. Craig R. Littler, The Development of the Labor Process in Capitalist Societies (London, 1982), 40–41.
79. Michael Burawoy, Manufacturing Consent: Changes in the Labor Process Under Monopoly Capitalism (Chicago, 1979), 46–94.
80. Licht, Working for the Railroad, 89–93.
81. Kasson, Civilizing the Machine, 86–97.
82. Dublin, Women at Work, 112.
83. Caroline Ware, The Early New England Cotton Manufacture: A Study in Industrial Beginnings (Boston, 1931), 251.
84. Dublin, Women at Work, 113–15.
85. Carlyle, “Signs of the Times,” 41.
86. Theophilus Parons, Memoir of Charles Greely Loring, Prepared Agreeably to a Resolution of the Massachusetts Historical Society (Cambridge, 1870), 9.
87. Rex v. Inhabitants of Christchurch (1760), Burrow's Settlement Cases 494.
88. Rex v. Inhabitants of Wintersett (1783) Clad. 298.
89. Dominus Rex v. Inhabitantes de Hales Owen (1717) 1 Strange 100.
90. Dalton's Countrey Justice (London, 1742) states at page 141.
91. Rex v. Kynaston (1800) 1 East 117.
92. Rex v. Inhabitants of St. James in Bury St. Edmunds (1808) 10 East 26.
93. Tomlinson v. Bentall and Another (1826) 5 B. & C. 738.
94. Priestley v. Fowler (1837) 3 M. & W. 1.
95. Sellen v. Norman (1829) 4 Car. & P. 80.
96. Cooper v. Phillips (1831) 4 Car. & P. 580.
97. Brian W. Napier, “The Contract of Service: The Concept and its Application” (Ph.D. diss., University of Cambridge, 1975), 129–35.
98. Nathan Dane, A General Abridgement and Digest of American Law, 9 vols. (Boston, 1823), 2:319.
99. Littleton v. Tuttle is reported at 4 Mass. 128.
100. Inhabitants of Winchendon v. Inhabitants of Hatfield (1808) 4 Mass. 122.
101. Inhabitants of Andover v. Inhabitants of Canton (1816) 13 Mass. 546.
102. Inhabitants of Stockbridge v. Inhabitants of West Stockbridge (1815) 12 Mass. 399 and in review (1817) 15 Mass. 256.
103. “As to hired servants, the employer is not bound to pay for medical attendance.” Abridgement, 9:35–36.
104. The American Justice (an abridged edition of Bum's Justice of the Peace) (Dover, N.H., 1792), 34–36.
105. Government and Labor in Early America (Boston, 1981).
106. Natterstrom v. The Hazard (1809) 17 Fed. Cas. 1243–50.
107. Dane, Abridgement, 9:202.
108. Robert Joseph Pothier, Treatise on the Contact of Letting and Hiring (Contract de Louage), trans. G. A. Mulligan (Durban, 1953), 66.
109. Transformation of American Law, 208.
110. Ratchford v. Niles, Supreme Judicial Court, November term 1807, Continuing Action 58.
111. “Sickness of Domestics,” The Boston Medical and Surgical Journal 2, No. 23 (21 July 1829), 353–54.
112. Massachusetts General Hospital, Annual Report to the Board of Trustees 1836, 39.
113. Ware, Early New England Cotton Manufacture, 61.
114. Wallace, Rockdale, 296–397.
115. Phillip Scranton, Proprietary Capitalism: The Textile Manufacture at Philadelphia, 1800–1885 (New York, 1983), 30–31.
116. Jean V. Matthews, Rufus Choate, The Law and Civic Virtue(Philadelphia, 1980), 74.
117. Harry Smith, “From Deodand to Dependency,” American Journal of Legal History 2 (1967): 389–403.
118. Elizabeth Cawthon, “Thomas Wakley and the Medical Coronership—Occupational Death and the Judicial Process,” Medical History 30 (1986): 191–202.
119. Parker-Harris Company v. Tale (1916) 135 Tennessee 510.
120. Farwell v. Boston & Worcester Railroad, Supreme Judicial Court (Suffolk County) November term 1840, Continuing Action 215.
121. Horwitz, Transformation of American Law, 210.
122. Comment, “Creation of a Common Law Rule,” 590–94.
123. Salsbury, The State, the Investor and the Railroad, 189.
124. Senate Document 55 (1842), 8.
125. Carlyle, “Signs of the Times,” 42.
126. American Law Journal 1, no. 4 (1808): 496.
127. Dane, Abridgement, vol. 2, 495, and generally 315–16, 494–95.
128. Gordon, “Critical Legal Histories,” 1122.
129. Transformation of American Law, 209.
130. Albro v. Jacquith, 70 Mass. 99, at 101.
131. Alan Fox, Beyond Contract: Work, Power and Trust Relations (London, 1974), 182–84.
132. Foucault, “Two Lectures,” in Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Writings, 1972–77, ed. Colin Gordon (New York, 1980), 104.
133. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (New York, 1979), 137–38.
134. Karl Renner, The Institutions of Private Law and their Social Functions, ed. Otto Kahn-Freund (London, 1949).
135. Fox, Beyond Contract, 188–89.
136. Richard Kinsey, “Despotism and Legality,” in Capitalism and the Rule of Law: From Deviancy Theory to Marxism, ed. Bob Fine, et al. (London, 1979), 46–64.
137. Foucault, Power/Knowledge, 92–108.
138. Gianfranco Poggi, The Development of the Modern State: A Sociological Introduction (London, 1978), 92–107.
139. Foucault, Power/Knowledge, 105.
140. Robert W. Gordon, “New Developments in Legal Theory,” in The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique, ed. David Kairys (New York, 1982), 286–92.
141. Paul Hirst, On Law and Ideology (London, 1979), 113, 146–50.
142. Jacqueline Tombs, “Law and Slavery in North America: The Development of a Legal Category” (Ph.D. diss., University of Edinburgh, 1982), 54–6.