Concern for policy outputs as a cue for supreme court decisions on certiorari

The Journal of Politics

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 1979, Pages 1185-1194

  Songer, Donald R ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84976156321     PISSN: 00223816     EISSN: 14682508     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2129740     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. More correctly Cn. Cornelius Scipio Hispanus, T. R. S. Broughton, The Magistrates of the Roman Republic i (1950), 482.
2. CRAI 1906, 63 f. Some of my criticisms are anticipated by E. Bickermann, RIDA 5 (1958), 146, n. 25 and 148, n. 32.
3. op. cit., 263-4.
4. Judaism and Hellenism I (1974), 263.
5. Greek and Latin Authors on Jews and Judaism I (1976), no. 147.
6. The Jews of Ancient Rome (1960), 3 f.
7. op. cit. (n. 5), 359.
8. Studies in Jewish Hellenism (1960), 166.
9. S. Alessandrí, Stud. Class, e Or. 17 (1968), 187 f., wishes altogether to deny the historicity of the expulsion of the Jews from Rome in 139 B.C. on the grounds that (1) it is not mentioned by any other source, (2) it is historically improbable that such an expulsion took place during a period of good diplomatic relations between Rome and the Jews, and (3) it is unlikely that there was any permanent community of Jews in Rome at so early a time. The author is also troubled by the association of Sabazius with the Jews in Paris’ version, something which he attributes to the probable intrusion of a marginal gloss. Although the article does not directly address the problem which concerns us here, it is valuable in showing that the same passage presents no small number of difficulties when considered from other angles. Nonetheless, I find it hard to accept Alessandri's conclusion that Valerius Maximus deliberately invented the ex-pulsion-story, in order to find favour with Tiberius.
10. See Kempf's edition of Valerius Maximus (1854), 78.
11. Kempf, op. cit., 81-2. The Berlin MS appears to be dependent on the Bern MS, at least in this particular.
12. Kempf, op. cit., 78-9.
13. The dates given for Paris and Nepotianus are those given by Kempf, op. cit., 46.
14. The editio princeps of Paris’ epitome is in vol. 111, pt. iii of A. Mai, Scriptorum veterum nova collectio e vaticanis codicibus edita ab Angelo Maio (1825-38). I have followed D. M. Schullian, Studies in honour of Ullman (1960), 93, in referring to this manuscript as Vat. Lat. 4929, although Kempf refers to it as 4229.
15. G. Billanovich, Aevum 30 (1956), 319 f., wishes to date both Vat. Lat. 4929 and Bemensis 366 to the ninth century. He also wishes to ascribe to Lupus of Ferriferes (d. 862) the insertion of material from Julius Paris into the lacuna in the text ofV alerius Maximus. He is of the opinion that both the text of Julius Paris used by Lupus and that of Vat. Lat. 4929 are derived from an edition made at Ravenna by a certain Rusticus Helpidius in the second quarter of the sixth century, as part of an historical and geographical encyclopaedia, including also such authors as Pomponius Mela and Vibius Sequester. Vat. Lat. 4929, in Billanovich's opinion, was written by Heiric of Auxerre (d. 876-7), a pupil of Lupus, and contains the same work as Rusticus’ encyclopaedia. We do not need here to pass judgement on the rightness or wrongness of Billanovich's arguments, which, nonetheless, appear to me more enthusiastic than objective. Suffice it to say that Billanovich nowhere addresses himself to our question, namely divergences between the Julius Paris of Bemensis 366 and that of Vat. Lat. 4929. If one accepts his arguments, then on the basis of the hypothesis here advanced, one would have to add to them that Heiric had before him a text of Nepotianus (or the like), whereas his master Lupus for some reason did not.
16. Kempf, op. cit., 67-9.
17. For this inscription and the history of its readings, see most recently E. Schwertheim and S. Sahin, ZPE 24 (1977), 260-1.
18. Mihailov, IG Bulg 11, 678.
19. Numen 23 (1976), 40 f., especially 52-6.
20. op. cit., 55.
21. Wasps, 8-10; Birds, 876; Lysistrata, 388; Horae, frag. 566 (Edmonds). All these seem to indicate that Sabazius is an ecstatic divinity.
22. Char act. 16, 4.
23. L. Robert, CRAI 1975, 306-30.
24. Dittenberger, OGIS, no. 331 = C. B. Welles, Royal Correspondence (1934), nos. 65-6.
25. F. K. Dörner, Inschriften und. Denkmäler aus Bithynien (1941), 62, no. 34.
26. RIDA 5 (1958), 137 f., especially 148-50. See n. 2 above.