John Locke, Lord Mansfield, and Arbitration During the Eighteenth Century

The Historical Journal

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 1993, Pages 137-159

  Oldham, James ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84976137607     PISSN: 0018246X     EISSN: 14695103     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0018246X00016149     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. J. Brewer, 'The Wilkites and the law, 1763-74: a study of radical notions of governance’, An ungovernable people, eds. J. Brewer and J. Styles (London, 1980), pp. 168–9. Burrows’ Worcester Journal of 15 Nov. reprinted the story from a London paper, The Gazeteer and New Daily Advertiser of 13 Nov.
2. W. Holdsworth, The history of English law, XIV (London, 1964), pp. 188, and 187–201.
3. Coats V. Pocok, 27 Charles II, 3 Keble 446 (ER 84); Holt v. Berry, 29–30 Charles II, 3 Keble 844 (ER 84). See also Skip v. Chamberlain, 6 William Mary, Comber bach 303 (ER 90); Forster v. Brunetti, 8 William III, 1 Salkeld 83 (ER gi).
4. C. W. Brooks, 'Interpersonal conflict and social tension: civil litigation in England 1640-1830', in eds. A. L. Beier et al. The first modem society (Cambridge, 1989), pp. 360–4.
5. E. Wolaver, ‘The historical background of commercial arbitration’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, lxxxiii (1934), 142.
6. James Oldham, The Mansfield manuscripts and the growth of English law in the eighteenth century (Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 2 vols., 1992), pp. 122–4. Appendix E calendars references to arbitration in cases brought to trial before Mansfield.
7. J. H. Baker, An introduction to English legal history (3rd edn, London, 1990), p. 60, and also p. 398.
8. G. Rubin and D. Sugarman, 'Towards a new history of law and material society in England, 1750—1914’, in eds. G. Rubin and D. Sugarman, Law, economy and society, 1750-1914: Essays in the history of English law (Abingdon, 1984), p. 15, and cf. p. 4.