메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 352, Issue , 2016, Pages

Patient feedback for quality improvement in general practice: A mixed bag of poorly evaluated methods leaves patients frustrated, and doctors little wiser

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; EDITORIAL; GENERAL PRACTICE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTEGRATED HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; UNITED KINGDOM; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROCEDURES;

EID: 84975914942     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: 17561833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i913     Document Type: Editorial
Times cited : (13)

References (6)
  • 1
    • 84960145877 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Patient participation groups in general practice: What are they for where are they going?
    • Gillam S, Newbould J. Patient participation groups in general practice: what are they for, where are they going? BMJ 2015;352:i673.
    • (2015) BMJ , vol.352 , pp. i673
    • Gillam, S.1    Newbould, J.2
  • 6
    • 85041233062 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • England NHS Available from
    • England NHS. Friends and Family Test data [11/01/16]. Available from: https://www. england.nhs.uk/ourwork/pe/fft/friends-And-family-test-data/.
    • Friends and Family Test Data [11/01/16]


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.