Raster data transformation for land change analyses: Combined impacts of reprojecting and rescaling categorical maps on landscape composition and configuration

Accuracy 2010 - Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Spatial Accuracy Assessment in Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 129-132

  Christman, Zachary ^a   Rogan, John ^b  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CLARK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Data integration; Land change; Projection; Reference system; Scale; Transformation

Indexed keywords

DATA INTEGRATION; ECOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING; MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS; NATURAL RESOURCES; PIXELS; RASTERIZATION;

LAND CHANGES; PROJECTION; REFERENCE SYSTEMS; SCALE; TRANSFORMATION;

METADATA;

EID: 84975780714     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Brower, L.P., O. Castiileja, A. Peralta, J. Lopez-Qarcia, L. Bojorquez-Tapia, S. Diaz, D. Melgarejo and M. Missrie. (2002). Quantitative changes in forest quality in a principal overwintering area of the monarch butterfly in Mexico, 1971-1999. Conservation Biology. 16(2), 346-359.
2. Christman, Z.J. (2010). Uncertainty and confusion in land change analyses with coarse resolution data: A case study from central Mexico using MODIS data. In Zachary J. (Ed.) Land change in central mexico: landscape heterogeneity, natural variability, and classification uncertainty (Dissertation), Christman. Worcester, Massachusetts: Clark University.
3. Dark, S.J. and D. Bram. (2007). The modifiable areal unit problem (MAUP) in physical geography. Progress in Physical Geography. 31(5), 471-479.
4. Dendoncker, N., P. Bogaert and M. Rounsevell. (2006). A statistical method to downscale aggregated land use data and scenarios. Journal of Land Use Science 1(2), 63-82.
5. DeZonia, B. and D.J. Mladenoff. (2004). IAN 1.0.23. Madison, Wisconsin: Department of Forest Ecology & Management, University of Wisconsin.
6. Eastman, J.R. (2009). IDRISI Taiga Guide to GIS and Image Processing. Worcester, Massachusetts: Clark Labs.
7. Fisher, P. F. (1997). The pixel: a snare and a delusion. International journal of Remote Sensing. 18, 679-685.
8. Fisher, P.F. (1999). Models of uncertainty in spatial data. In Michael Goodchild and Sucharita Gopal (eds). The Accuracy of Spatial Databases. London: Taylor & Francis.
9. Fotheringham, A.S. (1989). Scale-independent spatial analysis. In Michael Goodchild and Sucharita Gopal (eds). The Accuracy of Spatial Databases. London: Taylor & Francis.
10. Franklin, S.E. and M.A. Wulder. (2002). Remote sensing methods in medium spatial resolution satellite data land cover classification of large areas. Progress in Physical Geography. 26(2), 173-205.
11. Friedl, M., A. Strahler, Zhang Xiaoyang and J. Hodges. (2002). The MODIS land cover product: multi-attribute mapping of global vegetation and land cover properties from time series MODIS data. In Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2002. IGARSS '02. 2002 IEEE International.
12. Gustafson, E.J. (1998). Quantifying Landscape Spatial Pattern: What Is the State of the Art? Ecosystems. 1(2), 143-156.
13. Jelinski, D.E. and J. Wu. (1996). The modifiable areal unit problem and implications for landscape ecology. Landscape Ecology. 11(3), 120-140.
14. Li, Habin and J.F. Reynolds. (1993). A new contagion index to quantify spatial patterns of landscapes. Landscape Ecology. 8(3), 155-162.
15. Loveland, T. R. and A.S. Belward. (1997). The IGBP-DIS global 1km land cover data set, DISCover: first results. International Journal of Remote Sensing 18(15), 3289-3295.
16. Moody, A. and C.E. Woodcock. (1994). Scale-dependent errors in the estimation of land-cover proportions: Implications for global land-cover datasets. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 60(5), 585-594.
17. Openshaw, S. and P.J. Taylor. (1979). A million or so correlation coefficients: three experiments on the modifiable areal unit problem. In N. Wrigley (ed). Statistical applications in spatial sciences. London: Pion.
18. Riiters, K.H., R.V. O'Neill, C.T. Hunsaker, J. D. Wickham, D.H. Yankee, S.P. Timmins, K.B. Jones and B.L. Jackson. (1995). A factor analysis of landscape pattern and structure metrics. Landscape Ecology. 10(1), 23-39.
19. Seong, J.C (2003). Modelling the accuracy of image data reprojection. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 24(11), 2309-2321.
20. Steinwand, D.R. (1994). Mapping raster imagery to the interrupted goode homolosine projection. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 15(17), 3463-3471.
21. Steinwand, D. R., J.A. Hutchinson and J.P. Snyder. (1995). Map projections for global and continental data sets and an analysis of pixel distortion caused by reprojection. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 61(12), 1487-1497.
22. Tobler, W.R. (1963). Geographic area and map projections. Geographical Review. 53(1), 59-78.
23. Turner, M. G. (1989). Landscape ecology: The effect of pattern on process. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 20(1), 171-197.
24. Turner, M.G., R.V. O'Neill, R.H. Gardner and B.T. Milne. (1989). Effects of changing spatial scale on the analysis of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology 3(3), 153-162.
25. Usery, L.E. and J.C. Seong. (2001). All equal-area map projections are created equal, but some are more equal than others. Cartography and Geographic Information Science. 28, 183-194.
26. Wang, G., G. Gertner and A.B. Anderson. (2004). Up-scaling methods based on variability-weighting and simulation for inferring spatial information across scales. International Journal of Remote Sensing 25(22), 4961-4979.
27. White, Z. (2006). Display of pixel loss and replication in reprojecting raster rata from the sinusoidal projection. Geocarto International. 21(2), 19-22.