CSR ecological strategies and plant mating systems: outcrossing increases with competitiveness but stress-tolerance is related to mixed mating

Oikos

Volumn 125, Issue 9, 2016, Pages 1296-1303

  Munoz, François ^a,b   Violle, Cyrille ^b   Cheptou, Pierre Olivier ^b  

^a FRENCH INSTITUTE OF PONDICHERRY   (India)

^b UNIV MONTPELLIER   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLONIZATION; EVOLUTION; EVOLUTIONARY THEORY; FERTILIZATION (REPRODUCTION); HERB; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; OUTCROSSING; PLANT COMMUNITY; PRIMARY SUCCESSION; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; STRESS RESISTANCE; WOODY PLANT;

EID: 84975757932     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/oik.02328     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Armbruster, P. and Reed, D. H. 2005. Inbreeding depression in benign and stressful environments. – Heredity 95: 235–242.
2. Baker, H. G. 1955. Self-compatibility and establishment after ‘long-distance’ dispersal. – Evolution 11: 449–460.
3. Baker, H. G. 1967. Support for Baker's law-as a rule. – Evolution 21: 853–855.
4. Barrett, S. C. H. and Harder, L. D. 1996. Ecology and evolution of plant mating. – Trends Ecol. Evol. 11: 73–79.
5. Barrett, S. C. H. et al. 1996. The comparative biology of pollination and mating in flowering plants. – Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 351: 1271–1280.
6. Bawa, K. S. 1980. Evolution of dioecy in flowering plants. – Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 11: 15–39.
7. Blomberg, P. and Garland, T. 2002. Tempo and mode in evolution: phylogenetic inertia, adaptation and comparative methods. – J. Evol. Biol. 15: 899–910.
8. Burd, M. 1994. Bateman's principle and plant reproduction: the role of pollen limitation in fruit and seed set. – Bot. Rev. 60: 83–139.
9. Busch, J. W. 2005. The evolution of self-compatibility in geographically peripheral populations of Leavenworthia alabamica (Brassicaceae). – Am. J. Bot. 92: 503–512.
10. Caccianiga, M. et al. 2006. The functional basis of a primary succession resolved by CSR classification. – Oikos 112: 10–20.
11. Charlesworth, D. et al. 1990. Inbreeding depression, genetic load, and the evolution of outcrossing rates in a multilocus system with no linkage. – Evolution 44: 1469–1489.
12. Cheptou, P.-O. and Massol, F. 2009. Pollination fluctuations drive evolutionary syndromes linking dispersal and mating system. – Am. Nat. 174: 46–55.
13. Cheptou, P.-O. et al. 2000. Effects of competition on lifetime estimates of inbreeding depression in the outcrossing plant Crepis sancta (Asteraceae). – J. Evol. Biol. 13: 522–531.
14. Cheptou, P.-O. et al. 2002. Mating system variation along a successional gradient in the allogamous and colonizing plant Crepis sancta (Asteraceae). – J. Evol. Biol. 15: 753–762.
15. Davis, H. G. 2005. r-selected traits in an invasive population. – Evol. Ecol. 19: 255–274.
16. Delmas, C. et al. 2014. High lifetime inbreeding depression counteracts the reproductive assurance benefit of selfing in a mass-flowering shrub. – BMC Evol. Biol. 14: 243.
17. Dornier, A. et al. 2008. Allee effect and self-fertilization in hermaphrodites: reproductive assurance in a structured metapopulation. – Evolution 62: 2558–2569.
18. Durka, W. and Michalski, S. G. 2012. Daphne: a dated phylogeny of a large European flora for phylogenetically informed ecological analyses. – Ecology 93: 2297.
19. Eckert, C. G., et al. 2009. Plant mating systems in a changing world. – Trends Ecol. Evol. 25: 35–43.
20. Ellenberg, H., et al. 1991. Zeigerwerte von pflanzen in Mitteleuropa. – Ulmer.
21. Fisher, R. A. 1941. Average excess and average effect of a gene substitution. – Ann. Eugen. 11: 53–63.
22. Garamszegi, L. Z. 2014. Modern phylogenetic comparative methods and their application in evolutionary biology. – Springer.
23. Gelman, A. 2006. Prior distributions for variance parameters in hierarchical models (comment on article by Browne and Draper). – Bayesian Anal. 1: 515–534.
24. Grant, W. F. 1967. Cytogenetic factors associated with the evolution of weeds. – Taxon 16: 283–193.
25. Grime, J. P. 1974. Vegetation classification by reference to strategies. – Nature 250: 26–31.
26. Grime, J. P. 1977. Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. – Am. Nat. 111: 1169–1194.
27. Grime, J. P. 1979. Plant strategies and vegetation processes. – Wiley.
28. Grime, J. P. et al. 1997. Integrated screening validates primary axes of specialisation in plants. – Oikos 79: 259–281.
29. Grime, J. P. et al. 2007. Comparative plant ecology – a functional approach to common British species, 2nd edn. – Castlepoint Press.
30. Hadfield, J. D. 2010. MCMC methods for multi-response generalized linear mixed models: the MCMCglmm R package. – J. Stat. Soft. 33: 1–22.
31. Hadfield, J. 2014. MCMCglmm course notes. – < http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MCMCglmm/vignettes/Course-Notes.pdf >.
32. Hadfield, J. D. 2015. Increasing the efficiency of MCMC for hierarchical phylogenetic models of categorical traits using reduced mixed models. – Meth. Ecol. Evol. 6: 706–714.
33. Hadfield, J. D. and Nakagawa, S. 2010. General quantitative genetic methods for comparative biology: phylogenies, taxonomies and multi-trait models for continuous and categorical characters. – J. Evol. Biol. 23: 494–508.
34. Hodgson, J. G. et al. 1999. Allocating C-S-R plant functional types: a soft approach to a hard problem. – Oikos 85: 282–294.
35. Huston, M. and Smith, T. 1987. Plant succession: life history and competition – Am. Nat. 130: 168–198.
36. Kalisz, S. et al. 2004. Context-dependent autonomous self- fertilization yields reproductive assurance and mixed mating. – Nature 430: 884–887.
37. Kattge, J. et al. 2011. TRY – a global database of plant traits. – Glob. Change Biol. 17: 2905–2935.
38. Klotz, S. 1984. Phytoökologische beiträge zur charakterisierung und gliederung urbaner ökosysteme, dargestellt am beispiel der Städte Halle und Halle-Neustadt. – Martin-Luther-Universität.
39. Knight, T. M. et al. 2005. Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: pattern and process. – Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36: 467–497.
40. Kühn, I. et al. 2004. BiolFlor - a new plant trait database as a tool for plant invasion ecology. – Divers. Distrib. 10: 363–365.
41. Lande, R. and Schemske, D. W. 1985. The evolution of self- fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. – Evolution 39: 24–40.
42. Lloyd, D. G. 1979. Some reproductive factors affecting the selection of self-fertilization in plants. – Am. Nat. 113: 67–79.
43. Lloyd, D. G. 1992. Self-fertilization and cross-fertilization in plants. II. The selection of self-fertilization. – Int. J. Plant. Sci. 153: 370–380.
44. Morgan, M. T. et al. 1997. The evolution of self-fertilization in perennials. – Am. Nat. 150: 618–638.
45. Navas, M. L. et al. 2010. Suites of plant traits in species from different stages of a Mediterranean secondary succession. – Plant. Biol. 12: 183–196.
46. Pannell, J. R. and Barrett, S. C. H. 1998. Baker's law revisited: reproductive assurance in a metapopulation. – Evolution 52: 657–668.
47. Price, S. C. and Jain, S. K. 1981. Are inbreeders better colonizers? – Oecologia 49: 283–286.
48. Raevel, V. et al. 2012. Mechanisms of ecological succession: insights from plant functional strategies. – Oikos 121: 1761–1770.
49. Raunkiaer, C. 1934. The life forms of plants and statistical plant geography. – Oxford Univ. Press.
50. Renner, S. S. and Ricklefs, R. E. 1995. Dioecy and its correlates in the flowering plants. – Am. J. Bot. 82: 596–606.
51. Rydin, H. and Borgegård, S.-O. 1991. Plant characteristics over a century of primary sucession on islands: Lake Hjälmaren. – Ecology 72: 1089–1101.
52. Sakai, A. K. et al. 1995. Biogeographical and ecological correlates of dioecy in the Hawaiian flora. – Ecology 76: 2530–2543.
53. Silvertown, J. et al. 2002. Ecological and genetic correlates of long-term population trends in the Park Grass experiment. – Am. Nat. 160: 409–420.
54. Snell, R. and Aarssen, L. W. 2005. Life history traits in selfing versus outcrossing annuals: exploring the ‘time-limitation’ hypothesis for the fitness benefit of self-pollination. – BMC Ecol. 5.
55. Stebbins, G. L. 1950. Variation and evolution in plants. – Columbia Univ. Press.
56. Stebbins, G. L. 1957. Self-fertilization and population variability in the higher plants. – Am. Nat. 91: 337–354.
57. Stebbins, G. L. 1958. Longevity, habitat, and release of genetic variability in the higher plants. – Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 23: 365–378.
58. Sutherland, S. 2004. What makes a weed a weed? Life history traits of native and exotic plants in the USA. – Oecologia 141: 24–39.
59. Uyenoyama, M. et al. 1993. Ecological and genetic factors directing the evolution of self-fertilization. Oxford surveys in evolutionary biology. – Oxford Univ. Press.
60. Van Kleunen, M. and Johnson, S. D. 2007. Effects of self- compatibility on the distribution range of invasive European plants in North America. – Conserv. Biol. 21: 1537–1544.
61. Violle, C. et al. 2007. Let the concept of trait be functional! – Oikos 116: 882–892.
62. Vogler, D. W. and Kalisz, S. 2001. Sex among the flowers: the distribution of plant mating systems. – Evolution 55: 202–204.
63. Westoby, M. et al. 2002. Plant ecological strategies: some leading dimensions of variation between species. – Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33: 125–159.