MCDA and LCSA—a note on the aggregation of preferences

Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing

Volumn 416, Issue , 2016, Pages 105-116

  Clímaco, João Carlos Namorado ^a   Valle, Rogerio ^b  

^a INESC COIMBRA   (Portugal)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Aggregation of preferences procedures; Complexity; Life cycle sustainability assessment; Multi criteria analysis

Indexed keywords

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

AGGREGATION OF PREFERENCES; COMPLEXITY; DEEP UNCERTAINTIES; ENVIRONMENTAL LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT; INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE; LIFE CYCLE SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENTS; MULTI CRITERIA ANALYSIS; MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION AIDING;

LIFE CYCLE;

EID: 84975745827     PISSN: 21945357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-27478-2_8     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Sen, A: Idea of Justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2011)
2. Our Common Future–Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: United Nations (1987)
3. Zamagni, A., Pesonen, H.L., Swarr, T.: From LCA to life cycle sustainability assessment: concept, practice and future directions. Int. Life cycle Assess. 18, 1637–1641 (2013)
4. Reap, J., Roman, F., Duncan, S., Bras, B.: A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment–part 2: impact assessment and interpretation. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 13, 374–388 (2008)
5. Mazri, C., Ventura, A., Jullien, A., Bouyssou, D.: Life cycle analysis and decision aiding: an example of roads evaluation. http://sciencestage.com/d/1093635/life-cycle-analysis-anddecision-ainding-an-example-for-roads-evaluations-.html
6. Mietinen, P., Hamailainen, R.P.: How to benefit from decision analysis in environmental life cycle assessment (LCA). EJOR 102, 279–294 (1997)
7. Benoit, V., Pousseaux, P.: Aid for aggregating the impacts in life cycle assessment. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 8, 74–82 (2003)
8. Huppes, G., von Oers, L., Pretato, U., Pennington, D.: Weighting environmental effects: analytic survey with operational evaluation methods and a meta-method. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 17, 876–891 (2012)
9. Cinelli, M., Coles, S., Kirwan, K.: Use of multicriteria decision analysis to support life cycle sustainability assessment: an analysis of the appropriateness of the available methods. In: 6th International Conference on Life Cycle, Gothenburg (2013)
10. Halog, A., Manik, Y.: Advancing integrated systems modeling framework for life cycle sustainability assessment. Sustainability 3, 469–499 (2011)
11. Benetto, E., Dujet, C.: Uncertainty analysis and MCDA; A case study in life cycle assessment (LCA) practice. In: Proceedings of the 57th Meeting of the European Working Group on Multicriteria Decision Aiding. Viterbo (2003)
12. Dias, L., Clímaco, J.: Additive aggregation with interdependent parameters: the VIP analysis software. JORS 51, 1070–1082 (2000)
13. Clímaco, J., Fernandes, S., Captivo, M.E.: Classificação MultiAtributo Suportada por uma Versão Interactiva do Método Conjuntivo (An Interactive version of the Conjunctive Method dedicated to Multiattribute Classification Problems). CIO—Working Paper 9 (2011)
14. Clímaco, J., Craveirinha, J.: Multi-actor multidimensional quality of life and sustainable impact assessment—discussion based on a new interactive tool. In: Proceedings of GDN 2013, Sweden (2013)
15. Valle, R., Clímaco, J.: Green economy in the state of rio de janeiro—a non-compensatory multidimensional interactive evaluation. In: XXII MCDM Conference, Malaga (2012)
16. Figueira, J., Mousseau, V., Roy, B.: ELECTRE Methods, Multiple Criteria decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. In: Figueira, J., Erghot, M., Greco, S., Springer (2005)
17. Duarte, S.: Social impacts identification and characterization tool (SIICT): proposal and application for social LCA. SAGE/COPPE/UFRJ Internal Report (2014)
18. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. Paris (2009)