Comment on "Should we reframe how we think about physical activity and sedentary behavior measurement? Validity and reliability reconsidered"

International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Terwee, Caroline B ^a   Mokkink, L B ^a   Hidding, L M ^a   Altenburg, T M ^a   Poppel, M N ^a   Chinapaw, M J M ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Physical activity; Reliability; Sedentary behavior; Validity

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY; HUMAN; MOTOR ACTIVITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SEDENTARY LIFESTYLE;

HUMANS; MOTOR ACTIVITY; QUALITY OF LIFE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEDENTARY LIFESTYLE; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84975507405     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14795868     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12966-016-0392-8     Document Type: Note

References (10)

1. Kelly P, Fitzsimons C, Baker G. Should we reframe how we think about physical activity and sedentary behaviour measurement? Validity and reliability reconsidered. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016;13(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0351-4.
2. Chinapaw MJ, Mokkink LB, van Poppel MN, van Mechelen W, Terwee CB. Physical activity questionnaires for youth: a systematic review of measurement properties. Sports Med. 2010;40(7):539-63. doi: 10.2165/11530770-000000000-00000.
3. van Poppel MN, Chinapaw MJ, Mokkink LB, van Mechelen W, Terwee CB. Physical activity questionnaires for adults: a systematic review of measurement properties. Sports Med. 2010;40(7):565-600. doi: 10.2165/11531930-000000000-00000.
4. Wilson IB, Cleary PD. Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes. JAMA. 1995;273(1):59-65.
5. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(7):737-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006.
6. de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Bouter LM. When to use agreement versus reliability measures. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59(10):1033-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.10.015.
7. Reeve BB, Wyrwich KW, Wu AW, et al. ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research. Qual Life Res. 2013;22(8):1889-905. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0344-y.
8. Patrick DL, Burke LB, Gwaltney CJ, et al. Content validity--establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force report: part 2--assessing respondent understanding. Value Health. 2011;14(8):978-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.013.
9. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:22. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-22.
10. de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Ostelo RW, Beckerman H, Knol DL, Bouter LM. Minimal changes in health status questionnaires: distinction between minimally detectable change and minimally important change. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006;4:54. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-54.