Comparative study of the safety and efficacy of the Ahmed glaucoma valve model M4 (high density porous polyethylene) and the model S2 (polypropylene) in patients with neovascular glaucoma;Estudio comparativo de la seguridad y eficacia entre el dispositivo valvular de Ahmed modelo M4 (polietileno poroso de alta densidad) y el modelo S2 (polipropileno) en pacientes con diagnóstico de glaucoma neovascular

Archivos de la Sociedad Espanola de Oftalmologia

Volumn 91, Issue 9, 2016, Pages 409-414

  Gil Carrasco, F ^a   Jimenez Roman J ^a   Turati Acosta, M ^a   Bello Lopez Portillo H ^a   Isida Llerandi, C G ^a  

^a HOSPITAL DR LUIS SÁNCHEZ BULNES   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Ahmed valve; Intraocular pressure; Neovascular glaucoma

Indexed keywords

EYE DROPS; POLYETHYLENE; POLYPROPYLENE;

ADULT; ADVERSE EFFECTS; AGED; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GLAUCOMA DRAINAGE IMPLANT; GLAUCOMA, NEOVASCULAR; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIMODALITY CANCER THERAPY; POROSITY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; COMBINED MODALITY THERAPY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLAUCOMA DRAINAGE IMPLANTS; GLAUCOMA, NEOVASCULAR; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPHTHALMIC SOLUTIONS; POLYETHYLENE; POLYPROPYLENES; POROSITY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84975459496     PISSN: 03656691     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.oftal.2016.02.009     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. 1 Souza, C., Tran, D.H., Loman, J., Law, S.K., Coleman, A., Caprioli, J., Long-term outcomes of Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation in refractory glaucomas. Am J Ophthalmol 6 (2007), 893–900.
2. 2 Thieme, H., Choritz, L., Hoffmann-Rummelt, C., Schloetzer-Schrehardt, U., Kottler, U.B., Histopathologic findings in early encapsulated blebs of young patients treated with the Ahmed glaucoma valve. J Glaucoma 20 (2011), 246–251.
3. 3 Minckler, D.S., Shammas, A., Wilcox, M., Ogden, T.E., Experimental studies of aqueous filtration using the Molteno implant. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 85 (1987), 368–392.
4. 4 Dozier, C., Allingham, R.R., Asrani, S., Kondo, Y., Decroos, F.C., Olbrich, K.C., et al. Quantifying outflow resistance of a modified glaucoma valve in vivo. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 47, 2006 E-abstract 32.
5. 5 Klawitter, J.J., Bagwel, J.G., Wenstein, A.M., Sauer, B.W., An evaluation of bone growth into porous high density polyethylene. J Biomed Mater Res 10 (1976), 311–323.
6. 6 Spector, M., Harmon, S.L., Kreutner, A., Characteristics of tissue growth into proplast and porous polyethylene implants in bone. J Biomed Mater Res 13 (1979), 677–692.
7. 7 Kim, J., Allingham, R.R., Hall, J., Klitzman, B., Stinnett, S., Asrani, S., Clinical experience with a novel glaucoma drainage implant. J Glaucoma 23 (2014), 91–97.