Erratum: Minimally Invasive Colorectal Cancer Surgery in Europe: Implementation and Outcomes (Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise (2016) 95:22 (e3812) DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003812);Minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery in Europe

Medicine (United States)

Volumn 95, Issue 22, 2016, Pages e75d6-

  Babaei, Masoud ^a   Balavarca, Yesilda ^a   Jansen, Lina ^a   Gondos, Adam ^a   Lemmens, Valery ^b   Sjövall, Annika ^c   Johannesen, Tom Bosorge ^d   Moreau, Michel ^e   Gabriel, Liberale ^e   Gonçalves, Ana Filipa ^f   Bento, Maria José ^f   Van De Velde, Tony ^b   Kempfer, Lana Raffaela ^a   Becker, Nikolaus ^a   Ulrich, Alexis ^g   Ulrich, Cornelia M ^a,h   Schrotz King, Petra ^a   Brenner, Hermann ^a  

^a GERMAN CANCER RESEARCH CENTER DKFZ   (Germany)

^b NETHERLANDS CANCER INSTITUTE   (Netherlands)

^c KAROLINSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^d CANCER REGISTRY OF NORWAY   (Norway)

^e JULES BORDET INSTITUTE   (Belgium)

^f PORTUGUESE ONCOLOGY INSTITUTE   (Portugal)

^g UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^h UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BELGIUM; CANCER REGISTRY; CANCER SURGERY; CANCER SURVIVAL; COLON CANCER; COLORECTAL CANCER; EUROPE; FOLLOW UP; GERMANY; HUMAN; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NETHERLANDS; NORWAY; OVERALL SURVIVAL; PORTUGAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; RECTUM CANCER; SWEDEN; AGE; AGED; CANCER STAGING; COLON RESECTION; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; PROCEDURES; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; REGISTER; SEX DIFFERENCE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COLECTOMY; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; EUROPE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; NEOPLASM STAGING; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; REGISTRIES; SEX FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84975282689     PISSN: 00257974     EISSN: 15365964     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.MD.0000494754.98175.D6     Document Type: Erratum

References (30)

1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015; 65: 87-108
2. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015; 136: E359-E386
3. Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS. Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991; 1: 144-150
4. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al. Short-Term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-Assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005; 365: 1718-1726
5. Aziz O, Constantinides V, Tekkis PP, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006; 13: 413-424
6. Group, CCLoORS. Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-Term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009; 10: 44-52
7. Juo YY, Hyder O, Haider AH, et al. Is minimally invasive colon resection better than traditional approaches?: first comprehensive national examination with propensity score matching. JAMA Surg. 2014; 149: 177-184
8. Antoniou SA, Antoniou GA, Koch OO, et al. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery confers lower mortality in the elderly: a systematic review and meta-Analysis of 66, 483 patients. Surg Endosc. 2015; 29: 322-333
9. Hida K, Hasegawa S, Kinjo Y, et al. Open versus laparoscopic resection of primary tumor for incurable stage IV colorectal cancer: a large multicenter consecutive patients cohort study. Ann Surg. 2012; 255: 929-934
10. Brouquet A, Nordlinger B. Minimally-invasive approach for rectal cancer surgery. Lancet Oncol. 2014; 15: 680-681
11. Mathis KL, Nelson H. Controversies in laparoscopy for colon and rectal cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2014; 23: 35-47
12. Schmoll HJ, Van Cutsem E, Stein A, et al. ESMO Consensus Guidelines for management of patients with colon and rectal cancer. A personalized approach to clinical decision making. Ann Oncol. 2012; 23: 2479-2516
13. Thorpe H, Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, et al. Patient factors influencing conversion from laparoscopically assisted to open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2008; 95: 199-205
14. Allaix ME, Degiuli M, Arezzo A, et al. Does conversion affect short-Term and oncologic outcomes after laparoscopy for colorectal cancer? Surg Endosc. 2013; 27: 4596-4607
15. Clancy C, O'Leary DP, Burke JP, et al. A meta-Analysis to determine the oncological implications of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2015; 17: 482-490
16. Moghadamyeghaneh Z, Masoomi H, Mills SD, et al. Outcomes of conversion of laparoscopic colorectal surgery to open surgery. JSLS. 2014; 18: e2014.00230
17. McVie G, Ringborg U. EurocanPlatform, an FP7 project of the European Commission-first year commentary. Ecancermedicalscience. 2012; 6: ed13
18. Taylor EF, Thomas JD, Whitehouse LE, et al. Population-based study of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery 2006-2008. Br J Surg. 2013; 100: 553-560
19. Kemp JA, Finlayson SR. Nationwide trends in laparoscopic colectomy from 2000 to 2004. Surg Endosc. 2008; 22: 1181-1187
20. Boller AM, Nelson H. Colon and rectal cancer: laparoscopic or open? Clin Can Res. 2007; 13: 6894s-6896s
21. Yeo H, Niland J, Milne D, et al. Incidence of minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery at National Comprehensive Cancer Network Centers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015; 107: dju362
22. Robinson CN, Chen GJ, Balentine CJ, et al. Minimally invasive surgery is underutilized for colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011; 18: 1412-1418
23. Di BS, Li Y, Wei KP, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for colon cancer: a meta-Analysis of 5-year follow-up outcomes. Surg Oncol. 2013; 22: E39-E43
24. Martel G, Crawford A, Barkun JS, et al. Expert opinion on laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer parallels evidence from a cumulative meta-Analysis of randomized controlled trials. PloS One. 2012; 7: e35292
25. Green BL, Marshall HC, Collinson F, et al. Long-Term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2013; 100: 75-82
26. Allaix ME, Giraudo G, Mistrangelo M, et al. Laparoscopic versus open resection for colon cancer: 10-year outcomes of a prospective clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 2015; 29: 916-924
27. Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, et al. A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372: 1324-1332
28. Larsen IK, Smastuen M, Johannesen TB, et al. Data quality at the Cancer Registry of Norway: an overview of comparability, completeness, validity and timeliness. Eur J Cancer. 2009; 45: 1218-1231
29. Coebergh JW, Crommelin MA, van der Heijden LH, et al. Trends in cancer survival in the southeastern Netherlands since 1975: the Eindhoven Cancer Registry experience. Health Rep. 1993; 5: 105-110
30. Niitsu H, Hinoi T, Kawaguchi Y, et al. Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer is safe and has survival outcomes similar to those of open surgery in elderly patients with a poor performance status: subanalysis of a large multicenter case-control study in Japan. J Gastroenterol. 2015; 51: 43-54