Tag2Blog: Narrative generation from satellite tag data

Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn 2013-August, Issue , 2013, Pages 169-174

  Ponnamperuma, Kapila ^a   Siddharthan, Advaith ^a   Zeng, Cheng ^a   Mellish, Chris ^a   van der Wal, René ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMALS; CONSERVATION;

AUTOMATICALLY GENERATED; PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT; SATELLITE TAG; SIGNAL DATA; SINGLE SPECIES; TAGGED WILD ANIMALS;

SATELLITES;

EID: 84975174695     PISSN: 0736587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. E. André, K. Binsted, K. Tanaka-Ishii, S. Luke, G. Herzog, and T. Rist. 2000. Three robocup simulation league commentator systems. AI Magazine, 21(1):57.
2. S. Blake, A. Siddharthan, H. Nguyen, N. Sharma, A. Robinson, E. O Mahony, B. Darvill, C. Mellish, and R. van der Wal. 2012. Natural language generation for nature conservation: Automating feedback to help volunteers identify bumblebee species. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 2012), pages 311–324.
3. C. Calenge. 2006. The package adehabitat for the r software: tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals. Ecological Modelling, 197:1035.
4. A. Gatt and E. Reiter. 2009. SimpleNLG: A realisation engine for practical applications. In Proceedings of the 112th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation (ENLG), pages 90–93.
5. E. Goldberg, N. Driedger, and R.I. Kittredge. 1994. Using natural-language processing to produce weather forecasts. IEEE Expert, 9(2):45–53.
6. M. O’Donnell, C. Mellish, J. Oberlander, and A. Knott. 2001. Ilex: an architecture for a dynamic hypertext generation system. Natural Language Engineering, 7(3):225–250.
7. F. Portet, E. Reiter, A. Gatt, J. Hunter, S. Sripada, Y. Freer, and C. Sykes. 2009. Automatic generation of textual summaries from neonatal intensive care data. Artificial Intelligence, 173(7-8):789–816.
8. E. Reiter and R. Dale. 2000. Building Natural Language Generation Systems. Cambridge University Press.
9. M. Rhodes, S. Coupland, and T. Cruickshank. 2010. Enhancing real-time sports commentary generation with dramatic narrative devices. In Proceedings of the Third Joint Conference on Interactive Digital Storytelling, ICIDS 2010, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 111–116. Springer.
10. A. Siddharthan, M. Green, K. van Deemter, C. Mellish, and R. van der Wal. 2012. Blogging birds: Generating narratives about reintroduced species to promote public engagement. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Natural Language Generation Conference (INLG), pages 120–124.
11. J. Silvertown. 2009. A new dawn for citizen science. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24(9):467–471.
12. J. Smart, A. Amar, I.M.W. Sim, B. Etheridge, D. Cameron, G. Christie, and J.D. Wilson. 2010. Illegal killing slows population recovery of a reintroduced raptor of high conservation concern–the red kite milvus milvus. Biological Conservation, 143(5):1278–1286.
13. R. Stafford, A.G. Hart, L. Collins, C.L. Kirkhope, R.L. Williams, S.G. Rees, J.R. Lloyd, and A.E. Goodenough. 2010. Eu-Social Science: The Role of Internet Social Networks in the Collection of Bee Biodiversity Data. PloS one, 5(12):e14381.
14. K. van Deemter and J. Odijk. 1997. Context modeling and the generation of spoken discourse. Speech Communication, 21(1-2):101–121.