Les déterminants de la politique de tarification dynamique sur un Marché biface: Le cas des logiciels de type client-serveur

Revue d'Economie Industrielle

Volumn 135, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 89-114

  Chenavaz, Régis ^a   Leloup, Benoît ^b  

^a Paris School of Business   (France)

^b TELECOM PARISTECH   (France)

Author keywords

Dynamic pricing; Multiproduct diffusion; Optimal control; Two sided market

Indexed keywords

EID: 84975144405     PISSN: 01543229     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4000/rei.5128     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. ARMSTRONG M. (2006), « Competition in two-sided markets », The RAND Journal of Economics, vol. 37, no 3, pp. 668-691.
2. BASS F. (1969), « A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durable », Management Science, vol. 15, no 5, pp. 215-227.
3. BASS F. (1995), « Empirical Generalizations and Marketing Science: A Personal View », Marketing Science, 14, 3, G6-G19.
4. BAUYS B., KIM N. et SCHOCKER A. (2000), « Growth Models for Multiproduct Interactions : Current Status and New Directions », in : Mahajan V., Muller E. et Wind y. (eds), New-Product Diffusion Models, Boston, MA: Kluwer, pp. 141-164.
5. CHENAVAZ R. (2010), Les déterminants de la tarification dynamique, thèse, Telecom ParisTech.
6. CHENAVAZ R., CARRIER L.-P., ETIENNE L., PARASCHIV C. (2011), « Dynamic Pricing in Management Science », Journal of Economic Studies and Research, DOI: 10.5171/2011.283281.
7. CHIARAVUTTHIY. (2006), « Firms' stragegies and network externalities : Empirical evidence from the browser war », The Journal of High Technology Management Research, vol. 17, pp. 27-44.
8. COASE R. (1972), « Durability and Monopoly », Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 15, pp. 143-149.
9. DOCKNER E., JORGENSEN S., LONG N. et SORGER G. (2000), Differential Games in Economics and Management Science, Cambridge University Press
10. FARRELL J., SALONER G. (1986), « Installed Base and Compatibility: Innovation, Product Preannouncements, and Predation », American Economic Review, vol. 16, no 1, pp. 70-83
11. GALLAUGHER J. et WANGY. (2002), « Understanding Network Effects in Software Markets: Evidence from Web Server Pricing », MIS Quarterly, vol. 26, no 4, pp. 303-327
12. JENKINS M., LIU P., MATZKIN R. et McFADDEN D. (2005), « Browser War - Econometric Analysis of Markov Perfect Equilibrium in Markets with Network Effects », Working Paper, University of California, Berkeley
13. JORGENSEN S. (1986), « Optimal Dynamic Pricing in an Oligopolistic Market: A Survey », in : Basar T. (ed.), Dynamic Games and Applications in Economics, Springer Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol. 265, pp. 179-237
14. KALISH S. (1983), « Monopolist Pricing with Dynamic Demand and Production Cost », Marketing Science, vol. 2, no 2, pp. 135-159
15. LADRON A., ELBERSE A. et PUTSIS W. (2007), « Diffusion of Complementary Products with Networks Effects : A Model and Application », Working Paper
16. MAHAJAN V. et MULLER E. (1979), « Innovation Diffusion and New Product Growth Models in Marketing », Journal of Marketing, vol. 43, pp. 55-71
17. MAHAJAN V., MULLER E. et WIND Y. (2000), New-Product Diffusion Models, Boston, MA : Kluwer.
18. OSTA E., CARTWRIGHT P., PRABHU J. et BEVOLO M. (2007), « Research for Innovation : Defining Market Propositions », in Marketing Research Handbook, 5th ed. West Sussex : John Wiley and Sons, pp. 149-168
19. PARASCHIV C. et CHENAVAZ R. (2011), « Sellers' and Buyers' Reference Point Dynamics in the Housing Market », Housing Studies, 1466-1810
20. PARKER G. et Van ALSTYNE M. (2005), « Two-Sided Network Effects: A Theory of Information Product Design », Management Science, vol. 51, no 10, pp. 1494-1504
21. ROBINSON B. et LAKHANI C. (1975), « Dynamic Price Models for New Product Planning », Management Science, vol. 21, pp. 1113-1122
22. ROCHET J.-C., TIROLE J. (2006)), « Two-Sided Markets: A Progress Report », The RAND Journal of Economics, vol. 35, no 3, pp. 645-667
23. WINDRUM P. (2004), « Leveraging technological externalities in complex technologies: Microsoft's exploitation of standards in the browser wars », Research Policy, vol. 33, pp. 385-394.