Comparison of alcoholic chlorhexidine and povidone–iodine cutaneous antiseptics for the prevention of central venous catheter-related infection: a cohort and quasi-experimental multicenter study

Intensive Care Medicine

Volumn 42, Issue 9, 2016, Pages 1418-1426

  Pages, Justine ^a   Hazera, Pascal ^b   Mégarbane, Bruno ^c   du Cheyron, Damien ^a,d   Thuong, Marie ^e   Dutheil, Jean Jacques ^a   Valette, Xavier ^a   Fournel, François ^a   Mermel, Leonard A ^f   Mira, Jean Paul ^g   Daubin, Cédric ^a   Parienti, Jean Jacques ^a,d  

^a CAEN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^b General Hospital   (France)

^c HÔPITAL LARIBOISIÈRE   (France)

^d NORMANDIE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^e Department of Intensive Care Medicine   (France)

^f BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g Institut Cochin   (France)

Author keywords

Central venous catheter; Chlorhexidine; Cutaneous disinfection; Nosocomial infection; Povidone iodine

Indexed keywords

2 PROPANOL PLUS CHLORHEXIDINE GLUCONATE; POVIDONE IODINE; CHLORHEXIDINE; TOPICAL ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT;

ADULT; APPLICATION SITE DESQUAMATION; APPLICATION SITE ERYTHEMA; ARTICLE; CATHETER CARE; CATHETER INFECTION; CATHETER REMOVAL; CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONTACT DERMATITIS; CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT; DRUG EFFICACY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFECTION CONTROL; INFECTION PREVENTION; INFECTION RISK; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY (TOPIC); NONHUMAN; QUASI EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RISK REDUCTION; SEPSIS; SKIN DECONTAMINATION; ADVERSE EFFECTS; AGED; BLOOD; CATHETER-RELATED INFECTIONS; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CUTANEOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION; INCIDENCE; MULTICENTER STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK;

ADMINISTRATION, CUTANEOUS; AGED; ANTI-INFECTIVE AGENTS, LOCAL; CATHETER-RELATED INFECTIONS; CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERS; CHLORHEXIDINE; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POVIDONE-IODINE; RISK;

EID: 84975140856     PISSN: 03424642     EISSN: 14321238     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-016-4406-4     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Mermel LA (2011) What is the predominant source of intravascular catheter infections? Clin Infect Dis 52:211–212
2. O’Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA et al (2011) Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Am J Infect Control 39:S1–34
3. Mimoz O, Chopra V, Timsit J-F (2016) What’s new in catheter-related infection: skin cleansing and skin antisepsis. Intensive Care Med. doi:10.1007/s00134-016-4244-4
4. Maki DG, Ringer M, Alvarado CJ (1991) Prospective randomised trial of povidone–iodine, alcohol, and chlorhexidine for prevention of infection associated with central venous and arterial catheters. Lancet 338:339–343
5. Chaiyakunapruk N, Veenstra DL, Lipsky BA, Saint S (2002) Chlorhexidine compared with povidone–iodine solution for vascular catheter-site care: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 136:792–801
6. Parienti J-J, du Cheyron D, Ramakers M et al (2004) Alcoholic povidone–iodine to prevent central venous catheter colonization: a randomized unit-crossover study. Crit Care Med 32:708–713
7. Maiwald M, Chan ESY (2012) The forgotten role of alcohol: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical efficacy and perceived role of chlorhexidine in skin antisepsis. PLoS One 7:e44277
8. Mimoz O, Lucet J-C, Kerforne T et al (2015) Skin antisepsis with chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone–iodine-alcohol, with and without skin scrubbing, for prevention of intravascular-catheter-related infection (CLEAN): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, two-by-two factorial trial. Lancet 386:2069–2077
9. Parienti J-J, Mongardon N, Mégarbane B et al (2015) Intravascular complications of central venous catheterization by insertion site. N Engl J Med 373:1220–1229
10. Haute Autorité de Sante (2010) Check-list: pose d’un catheter veineux central (CVC) ou autre dispositif vasculaire (DV). http://www.has-sante.fr/portail/upload/docs/application/pdf/2011-01/11_01_check-list-cvc-dv.pdf. Accessed 8 June 2016
11. Brun-Buisson C, Abrouk F, Legrand P, Huet Y, Larabi S, Rapin M (1987) Diagnosis of central venous catheter-related sepsis. Critical level of quantitative tip cultures. Arch Intern Med 147:873–877
12. Raad I, Hanna HA, Alakech B, Chatzinikolaou I, Johnson MM, Tarrand J (2004) Differential time to positivity: a useful method for diagnosing catheter-related bloodstream infections. Ann Intern Med 140:18–25
13. Arpino B, Cannas M (2016) Propensity score matching with clustered data. An application to the estimation of the impact of caesarean section on the Apgar score. Stat Med 35:2074–2091
14. Austin PC, Grootendorst P, Anderson GM (2007) A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo study. Stat Med 26:734–753
15. Robins JM, Hernán MA, Brumback B (2000) Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiol Camb Mass 11:550–560
16. Austin PC (2009) Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples. Stat Med 28:3083–3107
17. Cole SR, Hernán MA (2004) Adjusted survival curves with inverse probability weights. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 75:45–49
18. Bailly S, Pirracchio R, Timsit JF (2016) What’s new in the quantification of causal effects from longitudinal cohort studies: a brief introduction to marginal structural models for intensivists. Intensive Care Med 42:576–579
19. Hussey MA, Hughes JP (2007) Design and analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials. Contemp Clin Trials 28:182–191
20. Parienti J-J, Cattoir V (2013) Daily chlorhexidine bathing and hospital-acquired infection. N Engl J Med 368:2331
21. Timsit J-F, Schwebel C, Bouadma L et al (2009) Chlorhexidine-impregnated sponges and less frequent dressing changes for prevention of catheter-related infections in critically ill adults: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 301:1231–1241
22. McCann M, Fitzpatrick F, Mellotte G, Clarke M (2016) Is 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol more effective at preventing central venous catheter-related infections than routinely used chlorhexidine gluconate solutions: a pilot multicenter randomized trial (ISRCTN2657745)? Am J Infect Control. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2016.02.019
23. Rijnders BJA, Van Wijngaerden E, Peetermans WE (2002) Catheter-tip colonization as a surrogate end point in clinical studies on catheter-related bloodstream infection: how strong is the evidence? Clin Infect Dis 35:1053–1058
24. Société française d’anesthésie et de réanimation, Société de réanimation de langue française (2009) [Prevention of hospital-acquired sepsis in intensive care unit (except cross transmission and neonate)]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 28:912–920
25. Pronovost P, Needham D, Berenholtz S et al (2006) An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. N Engl J Med 355:2725–2732
26. Sherertz RJ, Ely EW, Westbrook DM et al (2000) Education of physicians-in-training can decrease the risk for vascular catheter infection. Ann Intern Med 132:641–648
27. Cooper K, Frampton G, Harris P et al (2014) Are educational interventions to prevent catheter-related bloodstream infections in intensive care unit cost-effective? J Hosp Infect 86:47–52