Beijing consensus versuswashington consensus

Handbook of Emerging Economies

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 177-184

  Williamson, John ^a  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84975041877     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203108765-9     Document Type: Chapter

References (11)

1. Acemoglu, Daron and James Robinson (2012) Why Nations Fail the Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty, Crown Business, New York.
2. Doucouliagos, Hristos and Mehmet Ali Ulubaşoğlu (2008) ‘Democracy and Economic Growth: A Meta-Analysis’, American Journal of Political Science 52(1), January: 61–83.
3. Halper, Stefan (2010) The Beijing Consensus: How China’s Authoritarian Model Will Dominate the Twenty-first Century, Basic Books, New York.
4. Ramo, Joshua Cooper (2004) The Beijing Consensus, The Foreign Policy Centre, London.
5. Rodrik, Dani (2007) One Economics, Many Recipes, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
6. Rodrik, Dani (2008) Normalizing Industrial Policy, Commission on Growth and Development Working Paper No. 3.
7. Williamson, John (1990) Latin American Adjustment: How Much Has Happened? Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC.
8. Williamson, John (2005) ‘The Washington Consensus as Policy Prescription for Development’, in T. Besley and N.R. Zagha (eds), Development Challenges in the 1990s: Leading Policymakers Speak from Experience, World Bank, Washington, DC.
9. Williamson, John (2012a) ‘Is the Beijing Consensus Now Dominant?’ Asia Policy 13, January: 1–16.
10. Williamson, John (2012b) ‘Some Basic Disagreements on Development’, paper presented at a Panel at the High-Level Knowledge Forum for Rethinking Development Policy held by KDI and the World Bank in Seoul.
11. World Bank and the Development Research Center of China’s State Council (2012) China 2030: Building a Modern, Harmonious, and Creative High-Income Society, World Bank, Washington, DC.