Traffic crash liability determination: Danger and Dodge model

Accident Analysis and Prevention

Volumn 95, Issue , 2016, Pages 317-325

  Xu, Sikui ^a   Huang, Helai ^b  

^a Traffic Police Headquarters of Jiangsu Province ^*  (China)

^b CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Danger and dodge; Determination of liability; Pattern deciding effect; Rule of determination; Traffic crash

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; SAFETY ENGINEERING;

BASIC MECHANISM; DANGER AND DODGE; DANGEROUS SITUATIONS; LEGAL LIABILITY; PATTERN DECIDING EFFECT; RULE OF DETERMINATION; SEQUENTIAL ELEMENTS; TRAFFIC CRASHES;

ACCIDENTS;

AVOIDANCE BEHAVIOR; CAR DRIVING; CASE REPORT; CHINA; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HUMAN; LEGAL LIABILITY; LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE; PSYCHOLOGY; THEORETICAL MODEL; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT; VIOLENCE;

ACCIDENTS, TRAFFIC; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; AVOIDANCE LEARNING; CHINA; DANGEROUS BEHAVIOR; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HUMANS; LIABILITY, LEGAL; MODELS, THEORETICAL;

EID: 84975032502     PISSN: 00014575     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.06.001     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Alver, Y., Demirel, M.C., Mutlu, M.M., Interaction between socio-demographic characteristics: traffic rule violations and traffic crash history for young drivers. Accid. Anal. Prev. 72 (2014), 95–104.
2. Bagshaw, R., McBride, N., 2008. Tort Law. Longman. ISBN 1-4058-5949-0.
3. Chen, X., Theory of social adequacy: origin, conceptions and fundementals. Crim. Law Rev. 27:2 (2012), 254–320 (in Chinese).
4. Edlin, A.S., Efficient standards of due care: should courts find more parties negligent under comparative negligence?. Int. Rev. Law Econ. 14 (1994), 21–34.
5. Emons, W., Efficient liability rules for an economy with non-identical individuals. J. Public Econ. 42 (1990), 89–104.
6. Haddock, D., Curran, C., An economic theory of comparative negligence. J. Legal Stud. 14 (1985), 49–72.
7. Huang, H., Yin, Q., Schwebel, D.C., Li, L., Hu, G., Examining road traffic mortality status in China: a simulation study. PLoS One, 4, 2016, 0153251.
8. Kidner, R., Resiling from the Anns principle: the variable nature of proximity in negligence. Legal Stud. 7:3 (1987), 319–332.
9. Kim, J., Feldman, A.M., Victim or injurer, small car or SUV: tort liability rules under role-type uncertainty. Int. Rev. Law Econ. 26 (2006), 455–477.
10. Leibowitz, H.W., Owens, D.A., Tyrrell, R.A., The assured clear distance ahead rule: implications for nighttime traffic safety and the law. Accid. Anal. Prev. 30 (1998), 93–99.
11. Liu, P., A self-organizing feature maps and data mining based decision support system for liability authentications of traffic crashes. Neurocomputing 72 (2009), 2902–2908.
12. P.R. China, 2004. Regulations on the Implementation of the Road Traffic Safety Law of the People's Republic of China.
13. Wahlbin S., Johnston T., 2011. Computerized Method and System of Determining Right of Way and Liability for an Accident, United States Patent. Patent No.: US 7, 904, 318B2.
14. Welzal, H., Studien zum System des Strafrechts. Zeitschrift fur die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft, 58, 1939 S. 208 (in German).
15. Xu, S.-K., Discussion on the rules for liability determination in traffic accidents. Road Traffic Manag. 3 (1993), 28–31 (in Chinese).
16. Xu, S.-K., Rules and theory on liability determination in traffic accidents. J. Jiangsu Police Off. Coll. 24:4 (2009), 26–34 (in Chinese).
17. Xu, S.-K., Relationship of behavior, effect, fault, and liability. Road Traffic Manag. 2009:8 (2009), 57–58 (in Chinese).
18. Xu, S.-K., Theory on avoidance of a dangerous situation in road traffic accidents. Public Secur. Stud. 3 (2010), 54–62 (in Chinese).
19. Yu, H., From illegal results to illegal acts: analysis of the reliance principle and related issues. J. Natl. Procur. Coll. 10 (2004), 20–27 (in Chinese).