Erratum: Corporate board influences on organizations’ responses to performance shortfalls (Academy of Management Journal (2016) 59:3 (860–879) DOI: 10.5465/amj.2013.0948);The behavioral theory of the (governed) firm: Corporate board influences on organizations' responses to performance shortfalls

Academy of Management Journal

Volumn 59, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 860-879

  Desai, Vinit M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84974853471     PISSN: 00014273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5465/AMJ.635RETRACTION     Document Type: Erratum

References (53)

1. Ai, C., & Norton, E. C. 2003. Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Economics Letters, 80: 123-129.
2. Audia, P. G., & Greve, H. R. 2006. Less likely to fail: Low performance, firm size, and factory expansion in the shipbuilding industry.ManagementScience, 52:83-94.
3. Baum, J. A., Rowley, T. J., Shipilov, A. V., & Chuang, Y. T. 2005. Dancing with strangers: Aspiration performance and the search for underwriting syndicate partners. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50: 536-575.
4. Boeker, W., & Goodstein, J. 1991. Organizational performance and adaptation: Effects of environment and performance on changes in board composition. Academy ofManagement Journal, 34: 805-826.
5. Boeker,W., Goodstein, J., Stephan, J., & Murmann, J. P. 1997. Competition in a multimarket environment: The case of market exit. Organization Science, 8: 126-142.
6. Cameron, C., & Trivedi, P. 1998. Regression analysis of count data. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7. Chattopadhyay, P., Glick, W. H., & Huber, G. P. 2001. Organizational actions in response to threats and opportunities. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 937-955.
8. Chen, W. R. 2008. Determinants of firms' backward-and forward-looking R&D search behavior. Organization Science, 19: 609-622.
9. Chen, W. R., & Miller, K. D. 2007. Situational and institutional determinants of firms' R&D search intensity. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 369-381.
10. Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. 1963. A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
11. Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. 1995. Ceo and director turnover in failing firms-An illusion of change. Strategic Management Journal, 16: 393-400.
12. Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Ellstrand, A. E., & Johnson, J. L. 1998. Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 269-290.
13. Dalton, D. R., Hitt, M. A., Certo, S. T., & Dalton, C. M. 2007. The fundamental agency problem and its mitigation: Independence, equity, and the market for corporate control. The Academy of Management Annals, 1: 1-64.
14. Denrell, J., & March, J. G. 2001. Adaptation as information restriction: The hot stove effect. Organization Science, 12: 523-538.
15. Dowell, G. W. S., Shackell, M. B., & Stuart, N. V. 2011. Boards, CEOs, and surviving a financial crisis: Evidence from the internet shakeout. Strategic Management Journal, 32: 1025-1045.
16. Eldenburg,L., Hermalin, B. E.,Weisbach,M. S.,&Wosinska, M. 2004. Governance, performance objectives and organizational form: Evidence from hospitals. Journal of Corporate Finance, 10: 527-548.
17. Eldenburg, L. G., Gunny, K. A., Hee, K. W., & Soderstrom, N. 2011. Earnings management using real activities: Evidence from nonprofit hospitals. The Accounting Review, 86: 1605-1630.
18. Eldenburg, L. G., & Krishnan, R. 2008. The influence of ownership on accounting information expenditures. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25: 739-772.
19. Gaba, V., & Bhattacharya, S. 2012. Aspirations, innovation, and corporate venture capital:Abehavioral perspective. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 6: 178-199.
20. Gaba, V., & Joseph, J. 2013. Corporate structure and performance feedback: Aspirations and adaptation in M-form firms. Organization Science, 24: 1102-1119.
21. Gautam, K., & Goodstein, J. 1996. Insiders and business directors on hospital boards and strategic change. Hospital & Health Services Administration, 41: 423-440.
22. Gavetti, G., Greve, H. R., Levinthal, D. A., & Ocasio, W. 2012. The behavioral theory of the firm: Assessment and prospects. The Academy of Management Annals, 6: 1-40.
23. Golden, B. R., & Zajac, E. J. 2001. When will boards influence strategy? InclinationXpower5Strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 1087-1111.
24. Goodstein, J., & Boeker, W. 1991. Turbulence at the top-A new perspective on governance structure changes and strategic change. Academy of Management Journal, 34: 306-330.
25. Greene, W. 2010. Testing hypotheses about interaction terms in nonlinear models. Economics Letters, 107: 291-296.
26. Greve, H. R. 1998. Performance, aspirations, and risky organizational change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43: 58-86.
27. Greve, H. R. 2003a. A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovations: Evidence from shipbuilding. Academy of Management Journal, 46: 685-702.
28. Greve, H. R. 2003b. Organizational learning from performance feedback: A behavioral perspective on innovation and change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Greve, H. R. 2008. A behavioral theory of firm growth: Sequential attention to size and performance goals. Academy of Management Journal, 51: 476-494.
30. Haunschild, P. R., & Beckman, C. M. 1998. When do interlocks matter?: Alternate sources of information and interlock influence. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43: 815-844.
31. Iyer, D. N., & Miller, K. D. 2008. Performance feedback, slack, and the timing of acquisitions. Academy of Management Journal, 51: 808-822.
32. Karaca-Mandic, P., Norton, E. C., & Dowd, B. 2012. Interaction terms in nonlinear models. Health Services Research, 47: 255-274.
33. Karaevli, A., & Zajac, E. J. 2013. When do outsider CEOs generate strategic change? The enabling role of corporate stability. Journal of Management Studies, 50: 1267-1294.
34. Knudsen, T., & Levinthal, D. 2007. Two faces of search: Alternative generation and alternative evaluation. Organization Science, 18: 39-54.
35. Krause, R., Semadeni, M., & Cannella, A. A. 2013. External COO/presidents as expert directors: A new look at the service role of boards. Strategic Management Journal, 34: 1628-1641.
36. Krause, R., Semadeni, M., & Cannella, A. A. 2014. CEO duality: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 40: 256-286.
37. Krishnan, R. A., Joshi, S., & Krishnan, H. 2004. The influence of mergers on firms' product-mix strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 25: 587-611.
38. Mallette, P., & Hogler, R. L. 1995. Board composition, stock ownership and the exemption of directors from liability. Journal of Management, 21: 861-878.
39. March, J. G., & Shapira, Z. 1992. Variable risk preferences and the focus of attention. Psychological Review, 99: 172-183.
40. McDonald, M. L., & Westphal, J. D. 2003. Getting by with the advice of their friends: CEOs' advice networks and firms' strategic responses to poor performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48: 1-32.
41. Molinari, C., Morlock, L., Alexander, J., & Lyles, C. A. 1993. Hospital board effectiveness-Relationships between governing board composition and hospital financial viability. Health Services Research, 28: 357-377.
42. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. 1978. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
43. Ruef,M. 1997. Assessing organizational fitness on a dynamic landscape: An empirical test of the relative inertia thesis. StrategicManagement Journal, 18: 837-853.
44. Semadeni, M., & Anderson, B. S. 2010. The follower's dilemma: Innovation and imitation in the professional services industry. Academy of Management Journal, 53: 1175-1193.
45. Sundaramurthy, C., & Lewis, M. 2003. Control and collaboration: Paradoxes of governance. Academy of Management Review, 28: 397-415.
46. Tuggle, C. S., Sirmon, D. G., Reutzel, C. R., & Bierman, L. 2010. Commanding board of director attention: Investigating how organizational performance and CEO duality affect board members' attention to monitoring. Strategic Management Journal, 31: 946-968.
47. Weil, T. P. 2003. Governance in a period of strategic change in US healthcare. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 18: 247-265.
48. Werder, A. 2011. Corporate governance and stakeholder opportunism. Organization Science, 22: 1345-1358.
49. Westphal, J. D., & Bednar, M. K. 2005. Pluralistic ignorance in corporate boards and firms' strategic persistence in response to low firm performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50: 262-298.
50. Withers, M. C., Corley, K. G., & Hillman, A. J. 2012. Stay or leave: Director identities and voluntary exit from the board during organizational crisis. Organization Science, 23: 835-850.
51. Wooldridge, J. M. 2002. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
52. Young, G. J., Stedham, Y., & Beekun, R. I. 2000. Boards of directors and the adoption of a CEO performance evaluation process: Agency and institutional theory perspectives. Journal of Management Studies, 37: 277-295.
53. Zona, F., Zattoni, A., & Minichilli, A. 2013. A contingency model of boards of directors and firm innovation: The moderating role of firm size. British Journal of Management, 24: 299-315.