Finding and characterizing changes in ontologies

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2503, Issue , 2002, Pages 79-89

  Klein, Michel ^a   Kiryakov, Atanas ^b   Ognyanov, Damyan ^b   Fensel, Dieter ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b Sirma Group   (Bulgaria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTEROPERABILITY;

CHANGE MANAGEMENT; CONCEPTUAL MODEL; CONCEPTUAL RELATIONS; DYNAMIC NATURE; FORMAL REPRESENTATIONS; WEB BASED;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 84974739747     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45816-6_16     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. J. Banerjee, W. Kim, H.-J. Kim, and H. F. Korth. Semantics and Implementation of Schema Evolution in Object-Oriented Databases. SIGMOD Record (Proc. Conf. on Management of Data), 16(3): 311–322, May 1987.
2. S. Bechhofer, C. Goble, and I. Horrocks. DAML+OIL is not enough. In Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Working Symposium (SWWS), Stanford University, California, USA, July 30–Aug. 1, 2001.
3. S. Bechhofer, I. Horrocks, P. F. Patel-Schneider, and S. Tessaris. A proposal for a description logic interface. In P. Lambrix, A. Borgida, M. Lenzerini, R. Möller, and P. Patel-Schneider, editors, Proceedings of the International Workshop on Description Logics (DL’99), pages 33–36, Linköping, Sweden, July 30–Aug. 1 1999.
4. T. Berners-Lee, J. Hendler, and O. Lassila. The semantic web. Scientific American, 284(5): 34–43, May 2001.
5. D. Brickley and R. V. Guha. Resource Description Framework (RDF) Schema Specification 1.0. Candidate recommendation, World Wide Web Consortium, Mar. 2000.
6. D. Fensel, I. Horrocks, F. van Harmelen, S. Decker, M. Erdmann, and M. Klein. OIL in a nutshell. In R. Dieng and O. Corby, editors, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management; Methods, Models and Tools, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference EKAW 2000, number 1937 in LNCS, pages 1–16, Juan-les-Pins, France, Oct. 2–6, 2000. Springer-Verlag.
7. D. Fensel and M. A. Musen. The semantic web: A new brain for humanity. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 16(2), 2001.
8. T. R. Gruber. A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition, 5(2), 1993.
9. M. Klein and D. Fensel. Ontology versioning for the Semantic Web. In Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Working Symposium (SWWS), pages 75–91, Stanford University, California, USA, July 30–Aug. 1, 2001.
10. O. Lassila and R. R. Swick. Resource Description Framework (RDF): Model and Syntax Specification. Recommendation, World Wide Web Consortium, Feb. 1999. See http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax/.
11. D. L. McGuinness, R. Fikes, J. Rice, and S. Wilder. An environment for merging and testing large ontologies. In A. G. Cohn, F. Giunchiglia, and B. Selman, editors, KR2000: Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pages 483–493, San Francisco, 2000. Morgan Kaufmann.
12. J. F. Roddick. A survey of schema versioning issues for database systems. Information and Software Technology, 37(7): 383–393, 1995.
13. P. R. S. Visser, D. M. Jones, T. J. M. Bench-Capon, and M. J. R. Shave. An analysis of ontological mismatches: Heterogeneity versus interoperability. In AAAI 1997 Spring Symposium on Ontological Engineering, Stanford, USA, 1997.