Open-source tools for creation, maintenance, and storage of lexical resources for language generation from ontologies

Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2004

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 1485-1488

  Bontcheva, Kalina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LANGUAGE GENERATION; LANGUAGE RESOURCES; LEXICAL RESOURCES; NATURAL LANGUAGE TEXT; OPEN SOURCE TOOLS; UNIFIED MODEL; USER FRIENDLY INTERFACE;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 84974729203     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. John A. Bateman. 1997. Enabling technology for multilingual natural language generation: the KPML development environment. Natural Language Engineering, 3(1):15-55.
2. S. Bechhofer, F. van Harmelen, J. Hendler, I. Horrocks, D. L. McGuinness, P. F. Patel-Schneider, and L. A. Stein. 2003. OWL Web Ontology Language Reference. Technical report, W3C Proposed Recommendation 15 December 2003, http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/PRowl-ref-20031215/.
3. K. Bontcheva, A. Kiryakov, H. Cunningham, B. Popov, and M. Dimitrov. 2003. Semantic web enabled, open source language technology. In EACL workshop on Language Technology and the Semantic Web: NLP and XML, Budapest, Hungary.
4. C. B. Callaway. 2002. Tools for large-scale generation. In Proceedings of the ACL-02 Demonstrations Session, pages 118-119, Philadelphia, July.
5. H. Cunningham, D. Maynard, K. Bontcheva, and V. Tablan. 2002. GATE: A Framework and Graphical Development Environment for Robust NLP Tools and Applications. In Proceedings of the 40th Anniversary Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'02).
6. D. Fensel, W. Wahlster, and H. Lieberman, editors. 2002. Spinning the Semantic Web: Bringing the World Wide Web to Its Full Potential. MIT Press.
7. I. Horrocks and F. van Harmelen. 2001. Reference Description of the DAML+OIL (March 2001) Ontology Markup Language. Technical report. http://www.daml.org/2001/03/reference.html.
8. B. Hu, S. Dasmahapatra, and N. Shadbolt. 2003. From Lexicon To Mammographic Ontology: Experiences and Lessons. In D. Calvanese, G. De Giacomo, and E. Franconi, editors, Proceedings of the International Workshop on Description Logics (DL'2003), pages 229-233.
9. N. Ide and L. Romary. 2002. Standards for language resources. In Proceedings of 3rd Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC'2002), Gran Canaria, Spain.
10. O. Lassila and R.R. Swick. 1999. Resource Description Framework (RDF) Model and Syntax Specification. Technical Report 19990222, W3C Consortium, http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax/.
11. D. Maynard, V. Tablan, H. Cunningham, C. Ursu, H. Saggion, K. Bontcheva, and Y. Wilks. 2002. Architectural Elements of Language Engineering Robustness. Journal of Natural Language Engineering-Special Issue on Robust Methods in Analysis of Natural Language Data, 8(2/3):257-274.
12. G. Miller. 1995. WordNet: a Lexical Database for English. Communications of the ACM, Volume 38(Number 11), November.
13. NLM. Unified Medical Language System (UMLS). Technical report, National Library of Medicine, http://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/umlsmain.html.
14. E. Reiter and R. Dale. 2000. Building Natural Language Generation Systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
15. G. Wilcock and K. Jokinen. 2003. Generating Responses and Explanations from RDF/XML and DAML+OIL. In Knowledge and Reasoning in Practical Dialogue Systems, IJCAI-2003, pages 58-63, Acapulco.
16. G. Wilcock. 2003. Talking OWLs: Towards an Ontology Verbalizer. In Human Language Technology for the SemanticWeb andWeb Services, ISWC'03, pages 109-112, Sanibel Island, Florida.