An experimental study on query processing efficiency of native-XML and XML-enabled database systems

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2544, Issue , 2002, Pages 268-284

  Kurt, Atakan ^a   Atay, Mustafa ^b  

^a FATIH UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b Wayne State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EFFICIENCY; ELECTRONIC DATA INTERCHANGE; ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT EXCHANGE; HTTP; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION USE; QUERY PROCESSING; TEXT PROCESSING; XML;

COMMERCIAL DATABASE SYSTEM; DIFFERENT SIZES; IDENTICAL MACHINES; NATIVE XML DATABASE; RELATION ALGEBRAS; SEMI-STRUCTURED DOCUMENTS; WEB INTERFACE; XML-ENABLED DATABASE;

QUERY LANGUAGES;

EID: 84974720029     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-36233-9_21     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. W3 Consortium Extensible Markup Language (XML) http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml, W3C Recommendation 6 October 2000
2. A.R. Schmidt, et al., The XML Benchmark Project. INS-R0103, Amsterdam, Netherlands, April 30, 2001.
3. M. Fernandez, J. Simeon, P. Wadler. XML Query Languages: Experiences and Exemplars, Summer 1999
4. P. A. Boncz and M. L. Kersten. MIL primitives for Querying a Fragmented World. The VLDB Journal, 8(2):101-119, 1999.
5. A.R. Schmidt, et al., Efficient Relational Storage and Retrieval of XML Documents. In International Workshop on the Web and Databases (In conjuction with ACM SIGMOD), pages 47-52, Dallas, TX, USA, 2000.
6. T. Shimura, M. Yoshikawa, and S. Uemura. Storage and Retrieval of XML Documents Using Object-Relational Databases. In Database and Expert Systems Applications, pages 206-217. Springer, 1999.
7. D. Chamberlin, D. Florescu, J. Robbie, J. Smeon, and M. Stefanescu. Xquery: A Query Language for XML, Feb 2001, http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery.
8. T. Böhme, E. Rahm. Xmach-1:A Benchmark for XML Data Management.
9. P. Cotton, D. Fallside, A. Malhotra. Position Paper on XML Query. W3C Query Languages Workshop, December 1998.
10. Software AG. Tamino Documentation. 2001. http://www.softwareag.com/tamino/
11. Reston, VA, June 25, 2001. http://www.idc.com
12. B. Wait, Oracle Corporation. About Oracle XML Products. November 1999 http://otn.oracle.com/tech/xml/info/htdocs/otnwp/about_oracle_xml:products.htm
13. B. Wait, Oracle Corporation. Customizing Data Presentation. November 1999 http://otn.oracle.com/tech/xml/info/htdocs/otnwp/xml:custom_presentation.htm
14. Mustafa Atay, Query Processing Efficiency in Native-XML and XML-enabled Databases, Aug 2001 Fatih University, Istanbul, Turkey, MS Thesis.
15. S. Bressan, G. Dobbie, Z. Lacroix, M. L. Lee, Y. Guang Li, U. Nambiar, B. Wadhwa: XOO7: Applying OO7 Benchmark to XML Query Processing Tools, Proceedings of the 10th ACM CIKM, Atlanta, Georgia, November 2001.
16. P. Bohannon, J. Freire, P. Roy, J. Simeon: From XML, Schema to Relations: A Cost-based Approach to XML Storage. ICDE 2002
17. J. Shanmugasundaram, K. Tufte, C. Zhang, G. He, D. J. DeWitt, J. F. Naughton: Relational Databases for Querying XML, Documents: Limitations and Opportunities. VLDB 1999: 302-314
18. D. Florescu, D. Kossmann: Storing and Querying XML Data using an RDMBS. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin 22(3): 27-34 (1999)