An integrated performance visualizer for MPI/OpenMP programs

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2104, Issue , 2001, Pages 40-52

  Hoeflinger, Jay ^a   Kuhn, Bob ^a   Nagel, Wolfgang ^b   Petersen, Paul ^a   Rajic, Hrabri ^a   Shah, Sanjiv ^a   Vetter, Jeff ^c   Voss, Michael ^a   Woo, Renee ^a  

^a INTEL CORPORATION   (United States)

^b DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^c LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPLICATION PROGRAMMING INTERFACES (API); PARALLEL PROGRAMMING;

INTEGRATED ANALYSIS; PARALLEL PROCESSING; PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE PROBLEMS; SCALABLE PERFORMANCE; SCIENTIFIC CALCULATIONS; SMALL CLUSTERS; US DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY;

CLUSTER COMPUTING;

EID: 84974678406     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-44587-0_5     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. B. Buck and J.K. Hollingsworth. An API for Runtime Code Patching. to appear in Journal of Supercomputing Applications and High Performance Computing.
2. A.C. Calder, B.C. Curtis, and et al. High-Performance Reactive Fluid Flow Simulations Using Adaptive Mesh Refinement on Thousands of Processors. In Supercomputing 2000: High Performance Networking and Computing Conference, 2000. electronic pub.
3. Etnus LLC, http://www.etnus.com/Products/TimeScan/index.html. TimeScan Multiprocess Event Analyzer, 2001.
4. European Center for Parallelism of Barcelona, Technical University of Catalonia, http://www.cepba.upc.es/paraver/docs/OMPItraceIBM.pdf. Paraver Reference Manual, 2000.
5. J.A. Kohl and G.A. Geist. XPVM 1.0 User’s Guide. Technical Report ORNL/TM 12981, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, November 1996.
6. J.T. Stasko. The PARADE Environment for Visualizing Parallel Program Exe- cutions: A Progress Report. Technical Report Technical Report GIT-GVU-95-03, Graphics, Visualization, and Usability Center, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, January 1995.
7. KAI Software, a division of Intel Americas, http://www.kai.com/parallel/kappro/guideview. GuideView Performance Analyzer, 2001.
8. A.A. Mirin, R.H. Cohen, and et al. Very High Resolution Simulation of Compressible Turbulence on the IBM-SP System. In Supercomputing’99: High Performance Networking and Computing Conference, 1999. electronic pub.
9. M.K. Bane and G.D. Riley. Automatic Overheads Profiler for OpenMP Codes. In Proceedings of the European Workshop on OpenMP (EWOMP) 2000, Edinburgh, Scotland, U.K., September, 2000.
10. M.T. Heath and J.A. Etheridge. Visualizing the Performance of Parallel Programs. IEEE Software, 8(5):29-39, September 1991.
11. Pallas GmbH, http://www.pallas.de/pages/vampir.htm. Vampir 2.5 -Visualization and Analysis of MPI Programs, 2001.
12. G.F. Pfister. In Search of Clusters: The Coming Battle in Lowly Parallel Computing. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1995.
13. W. Meira Jr. and T.J. LeBlanc and A. Poulos. Waiting Time Analysis and Performance Visualization in Carnival. In ACM SIGMETRICS Symp. on Parallel and Distributed Tools, May 1996.