Representations

A Companion to Cognitive Science

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 649-659

  Billman, Dorrit ^a  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Computational representations; Five realms; Physiological representations; Theoretical representations

Indexed keywords

EID: 84974667463     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781405164535.ch51     Document Type: Chapter

References (10)

1. Barsalou, L. W. 1990: On the indistinguishability of exemplar memory and abstraction in category representation. In T. K. Srull and R. S. Wyer, Jr. (eds), Advances in Social Cognition, vol. 3, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 61-88.
2. Fodor, J. A. and Pylyshyn, Z. W. 1988: Connectionism and cognitive architecture: a critical analysis. Special issue on connectionism and symbol systems. Cognition, 28, 3-71.
3. Kosslyn, S. M. 1981: The medium and the message in mental imagery: a theory. Psychological Review, 88, 46-66.
4. Nosofsky, R. M., Palmeri, R. J. and McKinley, S. C. 1994: Rule-plus-exception model of classification learning. Psychological Review, 101, 53-79.
5. Palmer, S. E. 1978: Fundamental aspects of cognitive representation. In E. Rosch and B. B. Lloyd (eds), Cognition and Categorization, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 259-303.
6. Pinker, S. 1991: Rules of language. Science, 253, 530-5.
7. Plunkett, K. and Marchman, V. 1991: U-shaped learning and frequency effects in a multilayered perception: implications for child language acquisition. Cognition, 38, 43-102.
8. Pylyshyn, Z. W. 1981: The imagery debate: analog media versus tacit knowledge. Psychological Review, 88, 16-45.
9. Redington, M. and Chater, N. 1996: Transfer in artificial grammar learning: a reevaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 123-38.
10. Smolensky, P. 1988: On the proper treatment of connectionism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 1-74.