Provably secure partially blind signatures

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1880, Issue , 2000, Pages 271-286

  Abe, Masayuki ^a   Okamoto, Tatsuaki ^a  

^a NTT CORPORATION   (Japan)

Author keywords

Blind signatures; Partially blind signatures; Witness indistinguishability

Indexed keywords

CRYPTOGRAPHY; NETWORK SECURITY;

BLIND SIGNATURE SCHEME; BLIND SIGNATURES; EFFICIENT SCHEMES; PARTIALLY BLIND SIGNATURE SCHEME; PARTIALLY BLIND SIGNATURES; RANDOM ORACLE MODEL; SIGNATURE SCHEME; WITNESS INDISTINGUISHABILITY;

AUTHENTICATION;

EID: 84974652864     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-44598-6_17     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. M. Abe and J. Camenisch. Partially blind signatures. In the 1997 Symposium on Cryptography and Information Security, 1997.
2. M. Abe and E. Fujisaki. How to date blind signatures. In K. Kim and T. Matsumoto, editors, Advances in Cryptology-ASIACRYPT ’96, volume 1163 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 244-251. Springer-Verlag, 1996.
3. M. Bellare and P. Rogaway. Random oracles are practical: a paradigm for designing efficient protocols. In First ACM Conference on Computer and Communication Security, pages 62-73. Association for Computing Machinery, 1993.
4. S. Brands. Untraceable off-line cash in wallet with observers. In D. Stinson, editor, Advances in Cryptology - CRYPTO ’93, volume 773 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 302-318. Springer-Verlag, 1993.
5. D. Chaum. Blind signatures for untraceable payments. In D. Chaum, R. Rivest, and A. Sherman, editors, Advances in Cryptology - Proceedings of Crypto ’82, pages 199-204. Prenum Publishing Corporation, 1982.
6. D. Chaum. Elections with unconditionally-secret ballots and disruption equivalent to breaking RSA. In C. G. Günther, editor, Advances in Cryptology - EUROCRYPT ’88, volume 330 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 177-189. Springer-Verlag, 1988.
7. D. Chaum, A. Fiat, and M. Naor. Untraceable electronic cash. In S. Goldwasser, editor, Advances in Cryptology - CRYPTO ’88, volume 403 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 319-327. Springer-Verlag, 1990.
8. R. Cramer. personal communication, 1997.
9. R. Cramer, I. Damgård, and B. Schoenmakers. Proofs of partial knowledge and simplified design of witness hiding protocols. In Y. G. Desmedt, editor, Advances in Cryptology - CRYPTO ’94, volume 839 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 174-187. Springer-Verlag, 1994.
10. T. ElGamal. A public key cryptosystem and a signature scheme based on discrete logarithms. In G. R. Blakley and D. Chaum, editors, Advances in Cryptology - CRYPTO ’84, volume 196 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 10-18. Springer-Verlag, 1985.
11. U. Feige, A. Fiat, and A. Shamir. Zero-knowledge proofs of identity. Journal of Cryptology, 1:77-94, 1988.
12. A. Fujioka, T. Okamoto, and K. Ohta. A practical secret voting scheme for large scale elections. In J. Seberry and Y. Zheng, editors, Advances in Cryptology - AUSCRYPT ’92, volume 718of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 244-251. Springer-Verlag, 1993.
13. S. Goldwasser, S. Micali, and R. Rivest. A digital signature scheme secure against adaptive chosen-message attacks. SIAM Journal of Computing, 17(2):281-308, April 1988.
14. L. C. Guillou and J.-J. Quisquater. A practical zero-knowledge protocol fitted to security microprocessor minimizing both transmission and memory. In C. G. Günther, editor, Advances in Cryptology - EUROCRYPT ’88, volume 330 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 123-128. Springer-Verlag, 1988.
15. A. Juels, M. Luby, and R. Ostrovsky. Security of blind digital signatures. In B. S. Kaliski Jr., editor, Advances in Cryptology - CRYPTO ’97, volume 1294 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 150-164. Springer-Verlag, 1997.
16. A. Menezes, P. Oorschot, and S. Vanstone. Handbook of Applied Cryptography. CRC Press, 1997.
17. K. Ohta and T. Okamoto. On concrete security treatment of signatures derived from identification. In H. Krawczyk, editor, Advances in Cryptology - CRYPTO ’98, volume 1462 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 354-369. Springer-Verlag, 1998.
18. T. Okamoto. Provably secure and practical identification schemes and corresponding signature schemes. In E. F. Brickell, editor, Advances in Cryptology - CRYPTO ’92, volume 740 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 31-53. Springer-Verlag, 1993.
19. D. Pointcheval. Strengthened security for blind signatures. In K. Nyberg, editor, Advances in Cryptology - EUROCRYPT ’98, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 391-405. Springer-Verlag, 1998.
20. D. Pointcheval and J. Stern. Provably secure blind signature schemes. In K. Kim and T. Matsumoto, editors, Advances in Cryptology-ASIACRYPT ’96, volume 1163 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 252-265. Springer-Verlag, 1996.
21. D. Pointcheval and J. Stern. Security proofs for signature schemes. In U. Maurer, editor, Advances in Cryptology - EUROCRYPT ’96, volume 1070 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 387-398. Springer-Verlag, 1996.
22. D. Pointcheval and J. Stern. Security arguments for digital signatures and blind signatures. Journal of Cryptology, 2000.
23. RSA Laboratories. PKCS #9: Selected Object Classes and Attribute Types, 2.0 edition, February 2000.