The historiography of academic international relations

Review of International Studies

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 1994, Pages 349-367

  Schmidt, Brian C ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84974409299     PISSN: 02602105     EISSN: 14699044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0260210500118169     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Ray Maghroori and Bennett Ramberg, Globalism Versus Realism: International Relations Third Debate (Boulder, 1982)
2. Margot Light and A.J.R. Groom (eds.), International Relations A Handbook of Current Theory (London, 1985)
3. Yosef Lapid, ‗The Third Debate: On the Prospects of International Theory in a Post-Positivist Era‘, International Studies Quarterly, 33 (1989), pp. 235-254
4. V. Spike Peterson, ‗Transgressing Boundaries: Theories of Knowledge, Gender and International Relations‘, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 21 (1992), pp. 183-206
5. Steve Smith, ‘The Forty Years’ Detour: The Resurgence of Normative Theory in International Relations‘, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 21 (1992), pp. 489-506
6. Herbert Butterfield and Martin Wight (eds.), Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics (London, 1966), p. 20
7. E.H. Carr, The Twenty Years' Crisis, 1919-1939 (New York, 1969)
8. Kenneth W.Thompson, Political Realism and the Crisis of World Politics (Princeton, 1960)
9. John A. Vasquez, The Power of Power Politics: A Critique (New Brunswick, 1983), p. 13
10. Mark V. Kauppi and Paul R. Viotti, The Global Philosophers: Western Politics in Western Thought (New York, 1992)
11. James Der Derian, ‗Introducing Philosophical Traditions‘, Millennium: Journal of International Studies 17 (1988), pp. 189-193
12. R.B.J. Walker, ‗History and Structure in the Theory of International Relations‘, Millennium: Journal of International Studies 18 (1989), pp. 163-183:
13. Timothy Dunne, ‗Mythology or Methodology? Traditions in International Theory‘, Review of International Studies 19 (1993), pp. 305-318
14. R.B.J. Walker, Inside/Outside: International Relations As Political Theory (Cambridge, 1993)
15. John G. Gunnell, ‗The Myth of the Tradition‘, American Political Science Review, 72, 1 (1978), pp.122-134
16. John S. Nelson (ed.), Tradition, Interpretation, and Science: Political Theory in the American Academy (Albany, NY, 1986)
17. John G. Gunnell, Between Philosophy and Politics: The Alienation of Political Theory (Amherst,1986), p. 95
18. John G. Gunnell, ‗Disciplinary History: The Case of Political Science‘, Strategies: Journal of Theory, Culture and Politics, 4-5 (1991), pp. 182-227
19. Martin Wight, ‗An Anatomy of International Thought‘, Review of International Studies 13 (1987), pp. 221-7
20. Hedley Bull, The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics (New York, 1977) p. 24
21. Robert O. Keohane, ‗International Institutions: Two Approaches‘, International Studies Quarterly, 32 (1988), pp. 379-396
22. Robert G. Gilpin, The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism‘, in Robert Keohane (ed.), Neorealism and its Critics (New York, 1986), p. 306
23. K.J. Holsti, The Dividing Discipline: Hegemony and Diversity in International Theory (Boston, 1985), p. 1
24. Arend Lijphart, ‘The Structure of the Theoretical Revolution in International Relations’,International Studies Quarterly, 18 (1974), pp. 42-43
25. James N. Rosenau (eds.), Contending Approaches to International Politics (Princeton, 1969
26. John S. Dryzek and Stephen T. Leonard, ‗History and Discipline in Political Science‘, American Political Science Review, 82 (1988), p. 1247
27. Michael C. Williams, ‗Rousseau, Realism, and Realpolitik‘, Millennium: Journal of International Studies 18 (1989)
28. Greg Russell, in Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 21 (1993), pp. 541-4
29. Quentin Skinner, ‗Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas‘, History and Theory, 8 (1969)
30. James Tully (ed.), Meaning and Context: Quentin Skinner and His Critics (Princeton, 1988)
31. Stanley Hoffmann, ‘An American Social Science: International Relations’. Daedalus, 106 (1977),
32. Bruce D. Hamlett, ‗The Never-Never Land of International Relations‘, International Studies Quarterly, 13 (1969), p. 283
33. Hugh C. Dyer and Leon Mangasarian (eds.), The Study of International Relations: The State of the Art (New York, 1989), p. 90
34. Paul S. Reinsch, ‗The American Political Science Association‘, The Iowa Journal of History and Politics, 2 (1904), pp. 155-161
35. W.W. Willoughby, ‗The American Political Science Association‘, Political Science Quarterly, 19 (1904), pp. 107-111
36. Steve Smith, ‗Paradigm Dominance in International Relations: The Development of International Relations as a Social Science‘, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 16 (1987), p. 192
37. William C. Olson and Nicholas Onuf, ‗The Growth of a Discipline: Reviewed‘, in Steve Smith (ed.), International Relations: British and American Perspectives (Oxford, 1985) p. 12
38. William C. Olson and A.J.R. Groom, International Relations Then and Now: Origins and Trends in Interpretation (London, 1991), p. 137
39. Jean-Francois Lyotard, The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge (Minnesota, 1989), p. 24
40. Morton A. Kaplan, ‗Is International Relations A Discipline?‘, The Journal of Politics, 23 (1961), pp. 462-476
41. Harry HoweRansom, ‗International Relations‘, The Journal of Politics, 30 (1968), pp. 345-371
42. Thomas J. Biersteker, ‗The Dialectics of World Order: Notes for a Future Archeologist of International Savoir Faire‘, International Studies Quarterly, 28 (1984), pp. 121 142
43. John G. Gunnell, The Descent of Political Theory: The Genealogy of an American Vocation (Chicago, 1993)
44. Hayward R. Alker Jr., ‗The Humanistic Moment in International Studies: Reflections on Machiavelli and las Casas‘, International Studies Quarterly, 36 (1992), pp. 347-371