Input, interaction, and second language production

Studies in Second Language Acquisition

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 1994, Pages 283-302

  Varonis, Evangeline Marlos ^b  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AKRON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84974313462     PISSN: 02722631     EISSN: 14701545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0272263100013097     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1987). Markedness and salience in second-language acquisition. Language Learning, 37, 385-407.
2. Brock, C., Crookes, G., Day, R., & Long, M. (1986). The differential effects of corrective feedback in native- speaker conversation. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 229-236). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.
3. Bruton, A. & Samuda, V. (1980). Learner and teacher roles in the treatment of error in group work. RELC Journal, 11, 49-63.
4. Chun, A., Day, R., Chenoweth, A., & Luppescu, S. (1982). Errors, interaction, and correction: A study of native-nonnative conversations. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 537-547.
5. Crookes, G., & Rulon, K. (1985). Incorporation of corrective feedback in native speaker/non-native speaker conversation. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 607.
6. Day, R. (Ed.). (1986). Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.
7. Day, R., Chenoweth, A., Chun, A., & Luppescu, S. (1984). Crrective feedback in native-nonnative discourse. Language Learning, 34, 19-45.
8. Doughty, C. (1991). Second language instruction does make a difference: Evidence from an empirical study of SL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 431-469.
9. Duff, P. (1986). Another look at interlanguage talk: Taking task to task. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 147-181). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.
10. Ellis, R. (1985). Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Ellis, R. (1991, April). The interactional hypothesis: A critical examination. Paper presented at the RELC Conference, Singapore.
12. Gass, S. (1988). Integrating research areas: A framework for second language studies. Applied Linguistics, 9, 198-217.
13. Gass, S. (1991, December). ELT methodology from a learning perspective. Paper presented at Second Chulalonkorn University Conference on Language Teaching, Bangkok, Thailand.
14. Gass, S., & Varonis, E. (1986). Sex differences in NNS/NNS interactions. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 327-351). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.
15. Gass, S., & Varonis, E. (1989). Incorporated repairs in nonnative discourse. In M. Eisenstein (Ed.), The dynamic interlanguage: Empirical studies in second language variation (pp. 71-86). New York: Plenum Press.
16. Hakuta, K. (1976). Becoming bilingual: A case study of a Japanese child learning English. Language Learning, 26, 321-351.
17. Knox, L. (1992, April). Cooperative fellow speakers and the enrichment of input: An application of relevance theory. Paper delivered at the Second Language Research Forum 1992, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
18. Long, M. (1980). Input, interaction and second language acquisition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
19. Long, M. (1983). Linguistic and conversational adjustments to non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5, 177-193.
20. Long, M. (1985). Input and second language acquisition theory. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 377-393). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
21. Long, M. (1992, March). Input, focus on form, and second language acquisition. Paper presented at the American Association of Applied Linguistics annual meeting, Seattle, WA.
22. Long, M., & Ross, S. (1992). Modifications that preserve language and meaning. In M. Tickoo (Ed.), Simplification. Singapore: Regional Language Center.
23. Loschky, L. (1994). Comprehensible input and second language acquisition: What is the relationship? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 303-324.
24. Macdonald, D. (1993, February). Learners and modified/negotiated interactions: What works for pronunciation. Paper presented at Second Language Acquisition-Foreign Language Learning III conference, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
25. Nagle, S., & Sanders, S. (1986). Comprehension theory and second language pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 9-26.
26. Osborne, R.J., & Wittrock, M.C. (1983). Learning science: A generative process. Science Education, 67, 489-508.
27. Parker, K., & Chaudron, C. (1987). The effects of linguistic simplifications and elaborative modifications on L2 comprehension. University of Hawaii Working Papers in English as a Second Language, 6, 107-133.
28. Pica, T. (1987). Second-language acquisition, social interaction, and the classroom. Applied Linguistics, 8, 321.
29. Pica, T., & Doughty, C. (1985). Input and interaction in the communicative classroom: A comparison of teacher-fronted and group activities. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 115-132). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
30. Pica, T., Holliday, L., Lewis, N., Berducci, D., & Newman, J. (1991). Language learning through interaction: What role does gender play? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 343-376.
31. Pica, T., Young, R., & Doughty, C. (1987). The impact of interaction on comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 737-758.
32. Pienemann, M. (1992). Teachability theory. Unpublished manuscript, Sydney, Australia.
33. Plough, I., & Gass, S. (1993). Interlocutor and task familiarity: Effects on interactional structure. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 35-56). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
34. Ross, S., Long, M., & Yano, Y. (1992, July). Simplification or elaboration? The effects of two types of text modifications on foreign language reading comprehension. Paper presented at the Pacific Second Language Research Forum, University of Sydney, Australia.
35. Samuda, V., & Rounds, P. (1993). Critical episodes: Reference points for analyzing a task in action. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks from a pedagogical perspective: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 125-138). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
36. Sato, C. (1986). Conversation and interlanguage development: Rethinking the connection. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 23-45). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.
37. Scarcella, R. (1983). Discourse accent in second language performance. In S. Gass & L. Selinker (Eds.), Language transfer in language learning (pp. 306-326). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
38. Scarcella, R. (1992). Interethnic conversation and second language acquisition: Discourse accent revisited. In S. Gass & L. Selinker (Eds.), Language transfer in language learning (pp. 109-137). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
39. Scarcella, R., & Higa, C. (1981). Input, negotiation and age differences in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 31, 409-438.
40. Schachter, J. (1986). Three approaches to the study of input. Language Learning, 36, 211-225.
41. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129-158.
42. Sharwood Smith, M. (1991). Speaking to many minds: On the relevance of different types of language information for the L2 learner. Second Language Research, 7, 118-132.
43. Tomlin, R., & Villa, V. (1994). Attention in cognitive science and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16,183-203.
44. Varonis, E., & Gass, S. (1985). Non-native/non-native conversations: A model for negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 6, 71-90.
45. Wagner-Gough, K., & Hatch, E. (1975). The importance of input in second language acquisition studies. Language Learning, 25, 297-308.
46. White, L. (1987). Against comprehensible input: The input hypothesis and the development of secondlanguage competence. Applied Linguistics, 8, 95-100.
47. Woken, M., & Swales, J. (1989). Expertise and authority in native-non-native conversations: The need for a variable account. In S. Gass, C. Madden, D. Preston, & L. Selinker (Eds.), Variation in second language acquisition: Discourse and pragmatics (pp. 211-227). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
48. Zuengler, J. (1989). Performance variation in NS-NNS interactions: Ethnolinguistic difference or discourse domain? In S. Gass, C. Madden, D. Preston, & L. Selinker (Eds.), Variation in second language acquisition-Discourse and pragmatics (pp. 228-244). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.