Strategic voting equilibria under the single nontransferable vote

American Political Science Review

Volumn 88, Issue 3, 1994, Pages 608-621

  Cox, Gary W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84974233496     PISSN: 00030554     EISSN: 15375943     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2944798     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Austen-Smith David. 1987. “Sophisticated Sincerity: Voting over Endogenous Agendas.” American Political Science Review 81: 1323–30.
2. Banks Jeffrey. 1985. “Sophisticated Voting Outcomes and Agenda Control.” Social Choke and Welfare 1: 295–306.
3. Cox Gary W. 1984. “Strategic Electoral Choice in Multi-Member Districts: Approval Voting in Practice?” American Journal of Political Science 28: 722–38.
4. Cox Gary W. 1987. “Duverger's Law and Strategic Voting.” University of California, San Diego. Typescript.
5. Cox Gary W. 1991. “Duverger's Law: An Interpretive Review of Research.” University of California, San Diego. Typescript.
6. Cox Gary W., and Munger Michael. 1989. “Closeness, Expenditures, and Turnout in the 1982 U.S. House Elections.” American Political Science Review 83: 217–231.
7. Cox Gary W., and Niou Emerson. 1994. “Seat Bonuses under the Single Non-Transferable Vote System: Evidence from Japan and Taiwan.” Comparative Politics 26: 221–236.
8. Downs Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.
9. Duverger Maurice. 1955. Political Parties. New York: Wiley.
10. Farquharson Robin. 1969. Theory of Voting. New Haven: Yale University Press.
11. Green Donald P., and Shapiro Ian. 1993. “Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science.” Institution for Social and Policy Studies Working Paper No. 1043. Yale University.
12. Hoffman Dale T. 1982. “A Model for Strategic Voting.” SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics 42: 751–61.
13. Laakso Marku, and Taagepera Rein. 1979. “Effective Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 12: 3–27.
14. Ledyard John. 1984. “The Pure Theoryy of Two Candidate Elections.” Public Choice 44: 7–41.
15. McKelvey Richard, and Ordeshook Peter. 1972. “A General Theory of the Calculus of Voting.” In Mathematical Applications in Political Science, vol. 6, ed. Herndon J.F. and Bernd J.L. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
16. McKelvey Richard, and Niemi Richard. 1978. “A Multistage Representation of Sophisticated Voting for Binary Procedures.” Journal of Economic Theory 18: 1–22.
17. Meehl P.E. 1977. “The Selfish Voter Paradox and the Thrown-away Vote Argument.” American Political Science Review 61: 11–30.
18. Miller Nicholas. 1980. “A New Solution Set for Tournaments and Majority Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 24: 68–96.
19. Myerson Roger, and Weber Robert. 1993. “A Theory of Voting Equilibria.” American Political Science Review 87: 102–114.
20. Niemi Richard. 1984. “The Problem of Strategic Voting under Approval Voting.” American Political Science Review 78: 952–58.
21. Ordeshook Peter, and Schwartz Thomas. 1987. “Agendas and the Control of Political Outcomes.” American Political Science Review 81: 179–99.
22. Palfrey Thomas. 1989. “A Mathematical Proof of Duverger's Law.” In Models of Strategic Choice in Politics, ed. Ordeshook Peter C. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
23. Reed Steven R. 1991. “Structure and Behaviour: Extending Duverger's Law to the Japanese Case.” British Journal of Political Science 29: 335–56.
24. Riker William H. 1982. “The Two-Party System and Duverger's Law: An Essay on the History of Political Science.” American Political Science Review 76: 753–66.
25. Shepsle Kenneth, and Weingast Barry. 1984. “Uncovered Sets and Sophisticated Voting Outcomes with Implications for Agenda Control.” American Journal of Political Science 28: 49–74.
26. Silverman B.W. 1981. “Using Kernel Density Estimates to Investigate Multimodality.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, ser. B 43: 97–99.