Conference panel: The intellectual legacy of the johns hopkins seminary of history and politics: Reconsidering the genealogy of the social sciences

Studies in American Political Development

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 1994, Pages 375-408

  McDonagh, Eileen ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84974219753     PISSN: 0898588X     EISSN: 14698692     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0898588X00001280     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Marvin E. Gettleman, ed., The Johns Hopkins University Seminary of History and Politics: The Records of an American Institution, 1877-1912, 5 vols. (New York: Garland Publishing, 1987).
2. Martin Bulmer, The Chicago School of Sociology: Institutionalization, Diversity, and the Rise of Sociological Research (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984).
3. Richard J. Bernstein, The New Constellation: The Ethical/Political Horizons of Modernity/Postmodernity (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992).
4. Stephen Toulmin, Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990).
5. Seyla Benhabib, Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics (New York: Routledge, 1992).
6. Stephen K. White, The Recent Work of Jürgen Habermas: Reason, Justice and Modernity (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988).
7. John Higham, “The Matrix of Specialization,” in Aledanda Oleson and John Voss, eds., The Organization of Knowledge in America, 1860-1920 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1979).
8. Dorothy Ross, The Origins of American Social Science (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991).
9. Sidney Fine, Laissez-Faire and the General-Welfare State: A Study of Conflict in American Thought, 1865-1901 (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1956).
10. Richard Hofstadter, Social Darwinism in American Thought (Boston: Beacon Press, 1955).
11. James T. Kloppenberg, Uncertain Victory: Social Democracy and Progressivism in European and American Thought, 1870-1920 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986).
12. Mary O. Furner, Advocacy and Objectivity: A Crisis in the Professionalization of American Social Science, 1865-1905 (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1975).
13. Richard Hofstadter, Academic Freedom in the Age of the College (New York: Columbia University Press, 1964).
14. E.A. Ross, Seventy Years of It: An Autobiography of Edward Alsworth Ross (London: D. Appleton-Century Company, Inc., 1936).
15. Thomas L. Haskell, The Emergence of Professional Social Science: The American Social Science Association and the Nineteenth-Century Crisis of Authority (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1977).
16. Mary Jo Deegan, Jane Addams and the Men of the Chicago School, 1892-1918 (New Brunswick: Transaction Books, 1988).
17. Philip J. Ethington, The Public City: The Political Construction of Urban Life in San Francisco, 1850-1900 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994).
18. Kathryn Kish Sklar, “Hull-House Maps and Papers: Social Science as Women's Work in the 1890s,” in Martin Bulmer, Kevin Bales, and Kathryn Kish Sklar, eds., The Social Survey in Historical Perspective, 1880-1940 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991), 111-147.
19. Ellen Fitzpatrick, Endless Crusade: Women Social Scientists and Progressive Reform (New York: Oxford University Press, 1990).
20. J. Graham Morgan, “Women in American Sociology in the Nineteenth Century,” Journal of the History of Sociology 2:2 (Spring 1980): 1-34.
21. Nancy F. Cott, The Grounding of Modern Feminism (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1987).
22. Theda Skocpol, Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992).
23. Robyn Muncy, Creating a Female Dominion in American Reform, 1890-1935 (New York: Oxford University, 1991).
24. Seth Koven and Sonya Michel, eds., Mothers of a New World: Maternalist Politics and the Origins of Welfare States (New York: Routledge, 1993).
25. Estelle B. Freedman, “Separatism as Strategy: Female Institution Building and American Feminism, 1870-1930,” Feminist Studies 5:3 (Fall 1979): 512-29.
26. Linda Kerber, “The Paradox of Women's Citizenship in the Early Republic: The Case of Martin vs. Massachusetts, 1805,” American Historical Review 97:2 (April 1992): 349-78.
27. Eileen McDonagh, “Gender Politics and Political Change,” in Lawrence C. Dodd and Calvin Jillson, eds., New Perspectives on American Politics (Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press, 1994), 58-73.
28. Susan Moller Okin, Justice, Gender and the Family (New York: Basic Books, 1989).
29. Carole Pateman, The Sexual Contract (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1988).
30. Ray Allen Billington, Frederick Jackson Turner: Historian, Scholar, Teacher (New York, 1973), no. 7, following p. 339.
31. John Higham, “Herbert Baxter Adams and the Study of Local History,” American Historical Review 89 (1984): 1225-39.
32. Peter Novick, That Noble Dream: The ‘Objectivity’ Question and the American Historical Profession (Cambridge, England, 1988), 87-88.
33. Richard Hofstadter, The Progressive Historians: Turner, Beard, Parrington (New York, 1968), 38-40, 65-67.
34. Hugh Hawkins provides a precise, reliable, and judicious narrative of Adams's activities in Pioneer: A History of the Johns Hopkins University, 1874-1889 (Ithaca, 1960).
35. Raymond J. Cunningham, “Mark, Volksstaat, and Weltstaat: The Historical Organicism of Herbert Baxter Adams,” unpublished essay. See also Johns Hopkins University Studies in Historical and Political Science, 1st ser. (1882-83).
36. W. Stull Holt, ed., Historical Scholarship in the United States, 1876-1901: As Revealed in the Correspondence of Herbert B. Adams (Baltimore, 1938).
37. Arthur S. Link, ed., The Papers of Woodrow Wilson, 2 (Princeton, 1967), 479-80.
38. Henry W. Bragdon, Woodrow Wilson: The Academic Years (Cambridge, MA, 1967), 57-64, 75-80, 95-113.
39. Elizabeth Donnan and Leo F. Stock, eds., An Historian's World: Selections from the Correspondence of John Franklin Jameson. Memoirs of the American Philosophical Society 42 (1956): 21, 25.
40. Marvin E. Gettleman, The Johns Hopkins Seminary 1 (May 8, 1884), 97.
41. John Franklin Jameson, “An Introduction to the Study of the Constitutional and Political History of the States,” The Johns Hopkins Studies, 4th ser., no. 5 (1886): 5-29.
42. Morey Rothberg and Jacqueline Goggin, eds., John Franklin Jameson and the Development of Humanistic Scholarship in America, 1 (1993): 13-14.
43. Marvin E. Gettleman, The Johns Hopkins Seminary 1 (January 23, 1885): 139.
44. Charles McLean Andrews, “The River Towns of Connecticut: A Study of Wethersfield, Hartford, and Windsor” The Johns Hopkins Studies, 7th ser., nos. 7-9 (1889): 8-9.
45. Charles McLean Andrews, “The Theory of the Village Community,” Papers of the American Historical Association 5 (1891): 47-60.
46. John Martin Vincent, “Herbert B. Adams,” in Howard W. Odum, ed., American Masters of Social Science (New York, 1927), 123.
47. Marvin E. Gettleman, The Johns Hopkins Seminary 1 (May 16, 1884): 100.
48. A.S. Eisenstadt, Charles McLean Andrews: A Study in American Historical Writing (New York, 1956), 9.
49. J.F. Jameson, “The American Historical Association, 1884-1909,” American Historical Review 15 (October, 1909): 5.
50. George G. Iggers and James M. Powell, eds., Leopold von Ranke and the Shaping of the Historical Discipline (Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1990).
51. Daniel Coit Gilman, The Benefits Which Society Derives from Universities (Baltimore, 1885), 15-16.
52. Frederick Rudolph, The American College and University: A History (New York: Vintage, 1965), 272-73.
53. Gore Vidal ed., Lincoln: Selected Speeches and Writings (New York: Vintage Books, 1992), 13-21.