Predicting Supreme Court Cases Probabilistically: The Search and Seizure Cases, 1962-1981

American Political Science Review

Volumn 78, Issue 4, 1984, Pages 891-900

  Segal, Jeffrey A ^a  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84974155686     PISSN: 00030554     EISSN: 15375943     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/1955796     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Aldrich J. Electoral choice in 1972: A test of some theorems of the spatial model of electoral competition. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1977, 5, 215-237.
2. Aldrich J., & Cnudde C. Probing the bounds of conventional wisdom: A comparison of regression, probit and discriminant analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 1975, 19, 571-608.
3. Perspectives on the Fourth Amendment. Amsterdam A.G. Perspectives on the Fourth Amendment. Minnesota Law Review, 1974, 58, 349-447.
4. Bickel A. The least dangerous branch: the Supreme Court at the bar of politics, U.S.A. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1963.
5. Cook B.B. Public opinion and federal judicial policy. American Journal of Political Science, 1977, 21, 567-600.
6. Croyle J.L. Measuring and explaining disparities in felony sentences: courtroom work group factors and race, sex and socioeconomic influences on sentence severity. Political Behavior, 1983, 5, 135-153.
7. Dworkin R.B. Fact style adjudication and the Fourth Amendment: the limits of lawyering. Indiana Law Journal, 1973, 48, 329-368.
8. Fisher F.M. The mathematical analysis of Supreme Court decisions and abuse of quantitative methods. American Political Science Review, 1958, 53, 321-338.
9. Freedman M. Roosevelt and Frankfurter. Boston: Little, Brown, 1967.
10. Gibson J.L. Judges' role orientations, attitudes and decisions: an interactive model. American Political Science Review, 1978, 72, 911-924. (a)
11. Gibson J.L. Race as a determinant of criminal sentences: a methodological critique and a case study. Law and Society Review, 1978, 12, 455-478. (b)
12. Hagan J. Extra-legal attributes and criminal sentencing: an assessment of a sociological viewpoint. Law and Society Review, 1974, 8, 337-363.
13. Kort F. Predicting Supreme Court cases mathematically: analysis of the right to counsel cases. American Political Science Review, 1957, 57, 1-12.
14. Kort F. Content analysis of judicial opinions and rules of law. In Schubert G. (Ed.). Judicial decision making. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1963.
15. Kort F. Regression analysis and discriminant analysis: An application of R.A. Fisher's theorem to data in political science. American Political Science Review, 1973, 67, 555-559.
16. LaFave W. Search and seizure (Vols. 1-3). St. Paul, Minn.: West, 1978.
17. Landynski J. Search and seizure and the Supreme Court. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1966.
18. Pindyck R.S., & Rubinfeld D.L. Econometric models and economic forecasts. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1976.
19. Rohde D., & Spaeth H. Supreme Court decision making. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman, 1976.
20. Rokeach M. Beliefs, attitudes and values. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1968.
21. Schubert G. Quantitative analysis of judicial behavior. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1954.
22. Spaeth H. Supreme Court policy making. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman, 1979.
23. Spaeth H., & Parker D. Effects of attitude toward situation upon attitude toward object. Journal of Psychology, 1969, 73, 173-182.
24. Spaeth H., & Teger S. Activism and restraint: a cloak for the justices' policy preferences. In Halpern S.C. & Lamb C.W. (Eds.). Supreme Court activism and restraint. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington, 1982.
25. Tanenhaus J., Schick M., Muraskin M., & Rosen D. The Supreme Court's certiorari jurisdiction and cue theory. In Schubert G. (Ed.). Judicial decision making. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1963.
26. Tate C.N. Personal attribute models of the voting behavior of U.S. Supreme Court justices: Liberalism in civil liberties and economic decisions, 1946-1978. Ajnerican Political Science Review, 1981, 75, 355-367.
27. Ulmer S.S. Discriminant analysis and an error criterion. In Schubert G. (Ed.). Judicial behavior. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1964.
28. Ulmer S.S. The discriminant function and a theoretical context for its use in estimating the votes of judges. In Grossman J. & Tanenhaus J. (Eds.). Frontiers of judicial research. New York: John Wiley, 1969.
29. Wasby S.L. Continuity and change from the Warren Court to the Burger Court. Pacific Palisades, Calif.: Goodyear, 1976.