How ‘unique’ should the military be? A review of representative literature & outline of a synthetic formulation

European Journal of Sociology

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 1990, Pages 3-59

  Boëne, Bernard ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84974064822     PISSN: 00039756     EISSN: 14740583     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0003975600005956     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Jean-Paul Moreigne, Officiers, pour quel, « office »? Contribution psychosociologique; à l'approche d'une nouvelle condition militaire, contemporainedu concept polémologique de dissuasion, Revue de Defense Nationale (May 1971), 718-727.
2. Albert D. Biderman What is Military?, in Sol TAX (ed.), The Draft: a handbook of facts and alternatives (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1967), pp. 122-137.
3. Mady W. SEGAL on military families, in Charles C. MOSKOS, Frank R. WOOD (eds.), The Military: more than just a job? (Washing-ton/New York, Pergamon-Brassey's, 1988), 79-97.
4. David R. SEGAL, Measuring the institutional/occupational change thesis, Armed Forces & Society, 12 No. 3 (Spring 1986).
5. Edward N. LUTTWAK, The Pentagon and the Art of War (New York, Simon and Schuster, 1984), pp. 266-267.
6. Gen A. BEAUFRE, Officiers, pour quel office ? La vocation militaire et la tradition, Le Figaro, 3 and 4 June 1971
7. Pierre DABEZIES, La spécificité militaire:esquisse d'une approche globale de l'armee, Arés (1980), 77-105;
8. VAN DOORN, The Soldier and Social Change (Beverly Hills, Sage Publications, 1975), chapter 2.
9. Maury D. FELD, A typology of military organization, Public Policy, VII, (1958), 3-40.
10. HUNTINGTON, Power, expertise and the military profession, Daedalus (Fall 1963), 785-807
11. HUNTINGTON, The Common Defense (New York, Columbia U.P., 1961).
12. HUNTINGTON, The Soldier and the State in the 1970's, in Andrew J. GOODPASTER and Samuel P. HUNTINGTON, Civil-Military Relations (Washington, American Enterprise Institute, 1977), pp. 5-28.
13. Max WEBER, Economy and Society edited by Guenther ROTH and Claus WITTICH (Berkeley, University of California Press, 1978), chapter VIII, p. 875
14. Morris JANOWITZ, Changing patterns of organizational authority, Administrative Science Quarterly, III (March 1959), 474-493.
15. Gwyn HARRIES-JENKINS, Dysfunctional consequences of military professionalization, in M. JANOWITZ and J. VAN DOORN (eds.), On Military Ideology (Rotterdam, Rotterdam University Press, 1971), pp. 139-165.
16. Arthur D. LARSON, Military professionalism and civil control: a comparative analysis of two interpretations, Journal of Political and Military Sociology, II, (1974), 57-72.
17. Amos PERLMUTTER, The Military and Politics in Modern Times (New Haven, Yale U.P., 1977) (foreword by S.P. Huntington).
18. Morris JANOWITZ, The Professional Soldier: a social and political portrait (New York, Free Press, 1974; 1st edition: i960); Military conflict (Beverly Hills, Sage Publications, 1975)
19. S. L. A. MARSHALL, Men Against Fire (New York, Morrow, 1947).
20. David R. SEGAL, John BLAIR, Frank NEWPORT, and Susan STEPHENS, Convergence, iso-morphism, and interdependence at the civil-military interface, Journal of Political and Military Sociology (Fall 1974), pp. 157.
21. Morris JANOWITZ, U.S. Forces and the Zero Draft, Adelphi Paper No. 94 (London, International Institute for Strategic Studies, 1973), reprinted in Military Conflict, op. cit. pp. 239 ff.
22. Jacques VAN DOORN, The Soldier and Social Change, op. cit. pp. 51-64.
23. Michel L. MARTIN, Warriors to Mana-gers: the French military establishment since 1945 (Chapel Hill, University of North CaroInternatiolina Press, 1981).
24. Hubert Jean-Pierre THOMAS, Fonction militaire et systeme dhommes, in H. TEZENAS du MONTCEL, H. J.-P. THOMAS, J.-C. RO-QUELO, F. CAILLETEAU, B. BOËNE, Les Hommes de la Défense (Paris, FEDN, 1981).
25. Bernard BOËNE, The Moskos and Thomas models contrasted, The Military and Society: the European experience (Munich, Sowi Internatnal Forum 41, 1984).
26. Giuseppe CAFORTO, The military profession: theories of change, Armed Forces & Society, XV, No. 1 (Fall 1988).
27. Hans SPEIER, The social types of war, American Journal of Sociology, (1941) 445-454.
28. Charles ARDANT Du Picq, Études sur le combat (Paris, Editions Champ Libre), 1978. 1st ed. 1876-77).
29. Gen S.L.A. MARSHALL, Men Against Fire (New York, Morrow, 1947).
30. Samuel A. STOUFFER et al. The American Soldier: studies in social psychology in World War II, Vol. II : Combat and its Aftermath (Princeton, Princeton U.P., 1949)
31. S. L. A. MARSHALL, op. cit. Edward SHILS, Morris JANOWITZ, Cohesion and Disin-SHILS, Morris JANOWITZ, Cohesion and Disin-tegration in the Wehrmacht in World War II, Public Opinion Quarterly, XII (Summer 1948)
32. Alexander L. GEORGE in Roge W. LITTLE (ed.), Handbook of Military Institutions (Beverley Hills, Sage, 1971)
33. W. Darryl HENDERSON, Cohesion: the human element in combat (Washington DC, NDU Press, 1985).
34. Jacques VAN DOORN, The Soldier and Social Change, op. cit. pp. 145-149.
35. Max WEBER'S classics, Politik als Beruf (1919)
36. Harold D. LASSWELL, The garrison state, American Journal of Sociology, XLVI (1940).
37. Amos PERLMUTTER, The Military and Politics in Modern Times (New Haven, Yale U.P., 1977).