Disgust and Moral Taboos

Philosophy

Volumn 67, Issue 262, 1992, Pages 431-446

  Kekes, John ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84974037923     PISSN: 00318191     EISSN: 1469817X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S003181910004064X     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. ‘There is no entry under “disgust” in The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, in The Encyclopedia of Social Sciences, in The Dictionary of the History of Ideas, or in the cumulative index of the last ten years of The Philosopher's Index.
2. Some particularly illuminating works combine the techniques of classical studies, literary criticism, and social anthropology. A few of the outstanding examples are E. R. Dodds, The Greeks and the Irrational (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1971)
3. M. Douglas, Purity and Danger (London: Routledge, 1966)
4. H. Lloyd-Jones, The Justice of Zeus (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1971)
5. R. Parker, Miasma (Oxford: Clarendon, 1983)
6. J. M. Redfield, Nature and Culture in the Iliad (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1975).
7. I. McGuiness, New Catholic Encyclopedia, Vol. 13, 245 (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967).
8. Devlin's writings on the subject are collected in P. Devlin, The Enforcement of Morals (London: Oxford University Press, 1965);
9. the reprint of 1979, contains responses to his critics. Perhaps the most forceful rejoinder is H. L. A. Hart, Law, Liberty and Morality (Stanford University Press, 1963).
10. B. Mitchell, Law, Morality and Religion in a Secular Society, (London: Oxford University Press, 1970) is a review of the whole controversy and contains a useful bibliography.